Skip to main content

SU(3) and SU(4) as spectrum-generating groups

  • 1. Quantization methods and special quantum systems
  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 146 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Physics ((LNP,volume 139))

Abstract

Using the analogy between the spectrum-generating SU(n) approach in particle physics and the dynamical group approach in atomic and molecular physics, we outline the basic ideas behind this alternative to broken-symmetry SU(n) approaches. We review various tests of dynamical SU(3) and SU(4) method, and discuss in particular two crucial tests of the fundamental assumptions.

Research supported in part by NSF grant GF 420(0 and DOE grant E(40-1) 3992.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. E.P. Wigner, Ges. Wiss. Gött., Math.-Phys. Klasse (1932) p. 546. Reprinted in “Group Theory and Solid State Physics”, Vol. I, P.H. Meijer, Editor (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1964) pp. 265–278. V. Bargmann, Annals of Math. 59, 1 (1954). G. Ludwig, “Grundlagen der Quantum Mechanik”, (Springer,;954) p. 101.

    Google Scholar 

  2. A.O. Barut and A. Böhm, Phys. Rev. 139B. 1107 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Y. Dothan, M. Gell-Mann, and Y. Ne'eman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 17. 145 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  4. N. Mukunda, L. O'Raifeartaigh, and E.C.G. Sudarshan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 15, 1041 (1965).

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Böhm, “Quantum Mechanics”, Chap. II (Springer, New York, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  6. This reation was first suggested by J. Werle, in “On a Symmetry Scheme Described by a Non-Lie-Algebra”, ICTP report (Trieste, 1965, unpublished). It was used in A. Böhm, Phys. Rev. 175, 1767 (1968), and in connection with spectrum-generating SU(3) in A. Böhm, Phys. Rev. 158, 1408 (1967); D7, 270 (1973); and A. Böhm and E.C.G. Sudarshan, Phys Rev. 178, 2264 (1969). The present scheme was formulated in A. Böhm and J. Werle, Nucl. Phys. B106, 165 (1976) and in Ref. [7]. The same idea was suggested also by van Dam and Biedenharn (see Ref. [9]).

    Google Scholar 

  7. A. Böhm, Phys. Rev. D13, 2110 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  8. The theoretical possibility of a mass-dependent correction factor has been noticed several times before: M. Gourdin, in Symmetries and Quark Models, edited by R. Chand (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1970), R.P. Feynman, Photon-Hadron Interaction (Benjamin, New York, 1972), D.R. Yennie, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 239 (1975), G.J. Aubrecht II and M.S.K. Razmi, Phys. Rev. D12, 2120 (1975). An octet-brokem SU(3) model incorporating current mixing has been used in L.M. Brown, P. Singer, Phys. Rev. D15, 3438 (1977) where further references are given. Mass dependent correction factors have also been derived from the Duffin-Kemmer-Petiau formalism: B.G. Kenney, D.C. Peaslee and M.M. Nieto, Phys. Rev. D13, 757 (1976), and references therein. The DKP formalism has also other results in common with our dynymical group approach;cf. footnote 16 of Ref. [7]. Another way of describing symmetry breaking effects by mass dependent correction factors in the effective coupling constants has been suggested by J. Schwinger, Proceedings of the 7th Hawaii Topical Conference on Particle Physics, Honolulu (1977) and L.F. Urrutia, “Legtonic and Radiative Meson Decays”, UCLA preprint (1977) (where further references to the description of symmetry breaking effects are given).

    Google Scholar 

  9. H. van Dam and L.C. Biedenharn, Phys. Rev. D14, 405 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  10. P. Kielanowski, Warsaw University preprint (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  11. D.R. Yennie, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 239 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. Böhm and R.B. Teese, University of Texas preprint ORO-3992-317 (to appear in Phys. Rev. D).

    Google Scholar 

  13. A. Böhm and R.B. Teese, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 629 (1977) and references therein. See also Ref. [121.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Settles, in R. Armenteros et al., “Physics from Friends” Geneva, 1978) p. 127.

    Google Scholar 

  15. A. Böhm, Univ. of Texas preprint ORO 316 (to appear in Phys. Rev. D).

    Google Scholar 

  16. K. Kleinknecht, in XVII International Conference on High Energy Physics, J.R. Smith, Editor (London, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. Garcia, Phys. Rev. D3. 2638 (1971); D9, 177 (1974; D10, 2839 (1974); and D12, 2692 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. Böhm, R.B. Teese, A. Garcia and J.S. Nilsson, Phys. Rev. D15, 689 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  19. M. Ross, Phys. Lett. 36B, 130 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Böhm, M. Igarashi and J. Werle, Phys. Rev. D15, 2461 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Heinz-Dietrich Doebner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1981 Springer-Verlag

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bohm, A., Teese, R.B. (1981). SU(3) and SU(4) as spectrum-generating groups. In: Doebner, HD. (eds) Differential Geometric Methods in Mathematical Physics. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 139. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-10578-6_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-10578-6_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-10578-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-38573-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics