Advertisement

SU(3) and SU(4) as spectrum-generating groups

  • A. Bohm
  • R. B. Teese
1. Quantization methods and special quantum systems
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 139)

Abstract

Using the analogy between the spectrum-generating SU(n) approach in particle physics and the dynamical group approach in atomic and molecular physics, we outline the basic ideas behind this alternative to broken-symmetry SU(n) approaches. We review various tests of dynamical SU(3) and SU(4) method, and discuss in particular two crucial tests of the fundamental assumptions.

Keywords

Symmetry Transformation Mass Operator Generalize Eigenvector Reduce Matrix Element Cabibbo Angle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    E.P. Wigner, Ges. Wiss. Gött., Math.-Phys. Klasse (1932) p. 546. Reprinted in “Group Theory and Solid State Physics”, Vol. I, P.H. Meijer, Editor (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1964) pp. 265–278. V. Bargmann, Annals of Math. 59, 1 (1954). G. Ludwig, “Grundlagen der Quantum Mechanik”, (Springer,;954) p. 101.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    A.O. Barut and A. Böhm, Phys. Rev. 139B. 1107 (1965).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Y. Dothan, M. Gell-Mann, and Y. Ne'eman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 17. 145 (1965)Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    N. Mukunda, L. O'Raifeartaigh, and E.C.G. Sudarshan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 15, 1041 (1965).Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    A. Böhm, “Quantum Mechanics”, Chap. II (Springer, New York, 1978).Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    This reation was first suggested by J. Werle, in “On a Symmetry Scheme Described by a Non-Lie-Algebra”, ICTP report (Trieste, 1965, unpublished). It was used in A. Böhm, Phys. Rev. 175, 1767 (1968), and in connection with spectrum-generating SU(3) in A. Böhm, Phys. Rev. 158, 1408 (1967); D7, 270 (1973); and A. Böhm and E.C.G. Sudarshan, Phys Rev. 178, 2264 (1969). The present scheme was formulated in A. Böhm and J. Werle, Nucl. Phys. B106, 165 (1976) and in Ref. [7]. The same idea was suggested also by van Dam and Biedenharn (see Ref. [9]).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    A. Böhm, Phys. Rev. D13, 2110 (1976).Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    The theoretical possibility of a mass-dependent correction factor has been noticed several times before: M. Gourdin, in Symmetries and Quark Models, edited by R. Chand (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1970), R.P. Feynman, Photon-Hadron Interaction (Benjamin, New York, 1972), D.R. Yennie, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 239 (1975), G.J. Aubrecht II and M.S.K. Razmi, Phys. Rev. D12, 2120 (1975). An octet-brokem SU(3) model incorporating current mixing has been used in L.M. Brown, P. Singer, Phys. Rev. D15, 3438 (1977) where further references are given. Mass dependent correction factors have also been derived from the Duffin-Kemmer-Petiau formalism: B.G. Kenney, D.C. Peaslee and M.M. Nieto, Phys. Rev. D13, 757 (1976), and references therein. The DKP formalism has also other results in common with our dynymical group approach;cf. footnote 16 of Ref. [7]. Another way of describing symmetry breaking effects by mass dependent correction factors in the effective coupling constants has been suggested by J. Schwinger, Proceedings of the 7th Hawaii Topical Conference on Particle Physics, Honolulu (1977) and L.F. Urrutia, “Legtonic and Radiative Meson Decays”, UCLA preprint (1977) (where further references to the description of symmetry breaking effects are given).Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    H. van Dam and L.C. Biedenharn, Phys. Rev. D14, 405 (1976).Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    P. Kielanowski, Warsaw University preprint (1978).Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    D.R. Yennie, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 239 (1975)Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    A. Böhm and R.B. Teese, University of Texas preprint ORO-3992-317 (to appear in Phys. Rev. D).Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    A. Böhm and R.B. Teese, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 629 (1977) and references therein. See also Ref. [121.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    R. Settles, in R. Armenteros et al., “Physics from Friends” Geneva, 1978) p. 127.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    A. Böhm, Univ. of Texas preprint ORO 316 (to appear in Phys. Rev. D).Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    K. Kleinknecht, in XVII International Conference on High Energy Physics, J.R. Smith, Editor (London, 1974).Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    A. Garcia, Phys. Rev. D3. 2638 (1971); D9, 177 (1974; D10, 2839 (1974); and D12, 2692 (1975).Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    A. Böhm, R.B. Teese, A. Garcia and J.S. Nilsson, Phys. Rev. D15, 689 (1977).Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    M. Ross, Phys. Lett. 36B, 130 (1971).Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    A. Böhm, M. Igarashi and J. Werle, Phys. Rev. D15, 2461 (1977).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Bohm
    • 1
  • R. B. Teese
    • 2
  1. 1.Center for Particle TheoryUniversity of TexasAustinUSA
  2. 2.Max-Planck-Institut für Physik und AstrophysikMünchenGermany

Personalised recommendations