Back-factorization procedures

  • C. Carimalo
  • P. Kessler
  • J. Parisi
Session VI
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 134)


We here discuss the problem of back-factorization in γγ collision processes; i. e., how to extract, from the experimental measurement of a reaction e e → e e X' the information on the physically interesting process γγ → X in the form of only one term or very few terms (cross section, polarization terms, structure functions). Back-factorization procedures are basically associated with the equivalent-photon approximation.

In part I, we define the principles of back-factorization for the reactions considered, and we discuss its application to experiments with finite-angle tagging of both outgoing electrons. Using a helicity formalism, we show that, under certain conditions - which appear to be quite stringent, as is proven by our numerical checks -, the completely differential cross section of e e e e X may be expressed as a five-term formula; after integration over azimuthal angles, it becomes a one-term formula, i. e. the double equivalent-photon approximation. In addition to double-tagging, measurements based on single-tagging and on double anti-tagging are also discussed from the point of view of back-factorization.

In part II, we treat the special configuration to be considered for a determination of the structure functions of the photon. Using the naive quark model without higher-order corrections, we are studying analytically and checking numerically the conditions to be satisfied in order to obtain a one-term formula for extraction of the information on the photon's quark content from the data measured.


Structure Function Differential Cross Section Azimuthal Angle Virtual Photon Polarization Term 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. (1).
    E. J. Williams, Proc. Roy. Soc. London A 1399 163 (1933); Phys, Rev, 45, 729 1934); Mat. Fys. Medd. 13, 4. C. F. von Weizsäcker, Zs. Phys. 88, 612 (1934). Still earlier approaches can be found in: N. Bohr. Philos. Mag. 25, 10 (1913) and 30, 581 (1915). E. Fermi, Zs. Phys. 29, 315 (1924). For a general review of the Williams-Weizsäcker method and its applications, see: P, Kessler, Acts Physics Austriaca 41, 141 (1975).Google Scholar
  2. (2).
    F. E. Low, Phys. Rev. 120, 582 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. (3).
    See e. g. the review paper by V. M. Budnev, I. F. Ginzburg, G. V. Medelin and V. G. Serbo, Phys. Rep. 15 C, 181 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. (4).
    C. Carimalo, P. Kessler and J. Parisi, Phys. Rev. D 20, 1057 (1979); Phys. Rev, D 20, 2170 (1979); Phys. Rev. D 21, 669 (1980)Google Scholar
  5. (5).
    C. E. Carlson and W. K. Tung, Phys. Rev. D 4, 2873 (1971)Google Scholar
  6. (6).
    See: N, Arteaga-Romero et al., Report LPC 80-06 (1980).Google Scholar
  7. (7).
    The deep-inelastic configuration was studied in particular by: S. J. Brodsky, T. Kinoshita and A. Terazawa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 27, 280 (1971), T. F. Walsh and P. Zerwas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44 B, 195 (1973). R. L. Kingsley, Nucl, Phys. B 60, 45 (1973). M. A. Ahmed and G. G. Ross, Phys. Lett. 5 B, 369 (1975). E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B 120, 189 (1977), O. Llewellyn Smith, Phys. Lett. 79 B, 83 (1978). K. Kajantie, Acts, Physics Austriaca, Suppl. XXI, 663 (1979); Phys, Lett. 83 B, 413 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1980

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Carimalo
    • 1
  • P. Kessler
    • 1
  • J. Parisi
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratoire de Physique CorpusculaireCollége de FranceParisFrance

Personalised recommendations