γγ Collisions pp 181-201 | Cite as

# Back-factorization procedures

## Abstract

We here discuss the problem of back-factorization in γγ collision processes; i. e., how to extract, from the experimental measurement of a reaction e e → e e X' the information on the physically interesting process γγ → X in the form of only one term or very few terms (cross section, polarization terms, structure functions). Back-factorization procedures are basically associated with the equivalent-photon approximation.

In part I, we define the principles of back-factorization for the reactions considered, and we discuss its application to experiments with finite-angle tagging of both outgoing electrons. Using a helicity formalism, we show that, under certain conditions - which appear to be quite stringent, as is proven by our numerical checks -, the completely differential cross section of e e e e X may be expressed as a five-term formula; after integration over azimuthal angles, it becomes a one-term formula, i. e. the double equivalent-photon approximation. In addition to double-tagging, measurements based on single-tagging and on double anti-tagging are also discussed from the point of view of back-factorization.

In part II, we treat the special configuration to be considered for a determination of the structure functions of the photon. Using the naive quark model without higher-order corrections, we are studying analytically and checking numerically the conditions to be satisfied in order to obtain a one-term formula for extraction of the information on the photon's quark content from the data measured.

## Keywords

Structure Function Differential Cross Section Azimuthal Angle Virtual Photon Polarization Term## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## References

- (1).E. J. Williams, Proc. Roy. Soc. London A 1399 163 (1933); Phys, Rev, 45, 729 1934); Mat. Fys. Medd. 13, 4. C. F. von Weizsäcker, Zs. Phys. 88, 612 (1934). Still earlier approaches can be found in: N. Bohr. Philos. Mag. 25, 10 (1913) and 30, 581 (1915). E. Fermi, Zs. Phys. 29, 315 (1924). For a general review of the Williams-Weizsäcker method and its applications, see: P, Kessler, Acts Physics Austriaca 41, 141 (1975).Google Scholar
- (2).F. E. Low, Phys. Rev. 120, 582 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- (3).See e. g. the review paper by V. M. Budnev, I. F. Ginzburg, G. V. Medelin and V. G. Serbo, Phys. Rep. 15 C, 181 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- (4).C. Carimalo, P. Kessler and J. Parisi, Phys. Rev. D 20, 1057 (1979); Phys. Rev, D 20, 2170 (1979); Phys. Rev. D 21, 669 (1980)Google Scholar
- (5).C. E. Carlson and W. K. Tung, Phys. Rev. D 4, 2873 (1971)Google Scholar
- (6).See: N, Arteaga-Romero et al., Report LPC 80-06 (1980).Google Scholar
- (7).The deep-inelastic configuration was studied in particular by: S. J. Brodsky, T. Kinoshita and A. Terazawa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 27, 280 (1971), T. F. Walsh and P. Zerwas, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44 B, 195 (1973). R. L. Kingsley, Nucl, Phys. B 60, 45 (1973). M. A. Ahmed and G. G. Ross, Phys. Lett. 5 B, 369 (1975). E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B 120, 189 (1977), O. Llewellyn Smith, Phys. Lett. 79 B, 83 (1978). K. Kajantie, Acts, Physics Austriaca, Suppl. XXI, 663 (1979); Phys, Lett. 83 B, 413 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar