# Numerical methods for Helmholtz-type equations in unbounded regions

Classical Scattering Theory

First Online:

## Keywords

Finite Element Method Neumann Problem Integral Equation Method Absorb Boundary Condition Natural Boundary Condition
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

## Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

## Footnotes and References

- [1]J. Keller: “Progress and prospects in the theory of linear wave propagation,” SIAM Rev.
**21**, No. 2, 229–245 (1979)Google Scholar - [2]
*Electromagnetic and Acoustic Scattering by Simple Shapes*, ed. by J.J. Bowman, T.B.A. Senior, P.L.E. Uslenghi (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1969), pp, 349–352Google Scholar - [3]While “direct discretization” refers to finite difference as well as finite element methods, we shall emphasize the finite element approachGoogle Scholar
- [4]B. Engquist, A. Majda: “Absorbing boundary conditions for the numerical simulation of waves,” Math. Comp.
**31**, No. 139, 629–651 (1977)Google Scholar - [5]B. Engquist, A. Majda: “Radiation boundary conditions for acoustic and elastic wave calculations,” to appearGoogle Scholar
- [6]A. Bayliss, E. Turkel: “Radiation conditions for wave-like equations,” to appearGoogle Scholar
- [7]C.I. Goldstein: “The finite element method for unbounded domains,” to appearGoogle Scholar
- [8]I. Babuska, A.K. Aziz: “Survey lectures on mathematical foundations of the finite element method” in
*The Mathematical Foundations of the Finite Element Method with Applications to Partial Differential Equations*, ed. by A.K. Aziz (Academic, New York,. 1972)Google Scholar - [9]P.G. Ciarlet:
*The Finite Element Method for Elliptic Problems*(North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978)Google Scholar - [10]G. Strang, G. Fix:
*An Analysis of the Finite Element Method*(Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1973)Google Scholar - [11]C.I. Goldstein: “Eigenfunction expansions associated with the Laplacian for certain domains with infinite boundaries, I and II,” Trans. Am. Math. Soc.
**135**, 1–50 (1969)Google Scholar - [12]C.I. Goldstein: “Eigenfunction expansions associated with the Laplacian for certain domains with infinite boundaries, III,” Trans. Am. Math. Soc.
**143**, 283–301 (1969)Google Scholar - [13]C.I. Goldstein: “Scattering theory in waveguides,” in
*Scattering Theory in Mathematical Physics*, ed. by J. A. La Vita, J.-P. Marchand (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1974)Google Scholar - [14]J.C. Guillot, C.H. Wilcox: “Steady-state wave propagation in simple and compound waveguides,” Math. Z.
**160**, 89–102 (1978)Google Scholar - [15]W.C. Lyford: “Spectral analysis of the Laplacian in domains with cylinders,” Math. Ann.
**218**, 229–251 (1975)Google Scholar - [16]G.J. Fix, S.P. Marin: “Variational methods for underwater acoustic problems,” J. Comp. Phys. 28, 253–270 (1978)Google Scholar
- [17]D.S. Jones:
*The Theory of Electromagnetism*(Pergamon, Oxford, 1964)Google Scholar - [18]C.I. Goldstein, H. Hahn, W. Bauer: “On the theory of iris-loaded waveguides,” Archiv für Elektronik and Übertragungstechnik (Electronics and Communication) AEU
**30**, 297–302 (1976)Google Scholar - [19]O.D. Kellogg:
*Foundations of Potential Theory*(Ungar, New York, 1929)Google Scholar - [20]A.J. Burton: “Numerical solution of scalar diffraction problems,” in
*Numerical Solution of Integral Equations*, ed. by L.M. Delves, J. Walsh (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1974)Google Scholar - [21]R.E. Kleinman, G.F. Roach: “Boundary integral equations for the three-dimensional Helmholtz equation,” SIAM Rev.
**16**, No. 2, 214–236 (1974)Google Scholar - [22]S.P. Marin: “A finite element method for problems involving the Helmholtz equation in two-dimensional exterior regions,” Ph.D. thesis, Carnegie-Mellon University (1978)Google Scholar
- [23]D. Greenspan, P. Werner: “A numerical method for the exterior Dirichlet problem for the reduced wave equation,” Arch. Rational Mech. Anal.
**23**, 288–316 (1966)Google Scholar - [24]A. Bayliss: “On the use of coordinate stretching in the numerical computation of high frequency scattering,” J. Sound Vib.
**60**(4), 543–553 (1978)Google Scholar - [25]J. Giroire: “Integral equation methods for exterior problems for the Helmholtz equation,” École Polytéchnique, Rapport Interne 40 (1978)Google Scholar
- [26]O.C. Zienkiewicz, D.W. Kelly, P. Bettess: “The coupling of the finite element method and boundary solution procedure,” Int. J. Num. Meth. Eng.
**11**, 355–375 (1977)Google Scholar - [27]C.E. Grosch, S.A. Orszag: “Numerical solution of problems in unbounded regions: coordinate transforms,” J. Comp. Phys.
**25**, 273–296 (1977)Google Scholar - [28]J.B. Keller: “Rays, waves, and asymptotics,” Bull Am. Math. Soc.
**84**, 727–750 (1978)Google Scholar - [29]C.I. Goldstein, H. Berry: “A numerical study of the weak element method applied to the Helmholtz equation,” Brookhaven National Laboratory Report BNL 50746 (1977) [301 I.S. Duff, N. Munksgaard, H.B. Nielson, J.K. Reid: “Direct solution of sets of linear equations whose matrix is sparse, symmetric, and indefinite,” Harwell Report CSS 44 (1977)Google Scholar
- [31]C.C. Paige, M.A. Saunders: “Solutions of sparse indefinite systems of linear equations,” SIAM J. Num. Anal.
**12**, 617–629 (1975)Google Scholar - [32]A. Brandt: “Multi-level adaptive solutions to boundary value problems,” Math. Comp.
**31**, 333–390 (1977)Google Scholar - [33]R.A. Nicolaides: “On the
*l*_{2}convergence of an algorithm for solving finite element equations,” Math. Comp.**31**, 892–906 (1977)Google Scholar

## Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1980