Two Hadron Interaction

  • E. L. Lomon
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 87)


In the past year nucleon-nucleon physics has been moving ahead rapidly especially on the experimental side. Data reported last year at the Vancouver and Tokyo conferences cleared up some old ambiguities below 50 MeV in the P states and the 3S13D1 mixing parameter. Evidence from TRIUMF and ANL was beginning to give us an inkling of the impact that the new data from intermediate energies would have. Since then the analysis of the nucleon-nucleon data from the BASQUE group at TRIUMF has shown that there are important revisions from the Livermore phase shifts. Indeed their new phases allow the possibility of some structure even in their energy range(1). The polarized beam, polarized target results from ANL now indicate with some assurance that there is a 3F3 resonance near 2.26 GeV barycentric energy and probably the expected singlet 1D2 resonance near 2.10 GeV(2). Also new experimental results this past year from Kamae et al have confirmed and extended their 1977 results, which show a large peak in the proton polarization in deuteron photodisintegration at an energy corresponding to a possible dibaryon resonance at 2.35 GeV(3). Some of the theoretical contributions to this conference which I will present later bear on this new experimental information.


Meson Exchange Phase Shift Analysis Pion Exchange Deuteron Wave Function Current Correction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    See Figs.1 and 2.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    See Fig.3, and I.P. Auer et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 41, 355 (1978).ADSGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    See Fig. 4, and Kamae et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 470 (1977).ADSGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    See Fig.1 of contribution 1.2 to this conference.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    See Fig.5, and Fig.2 of contribution 1.1 to this conference.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E. Lomon and H. Feshbach, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 48, 94 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    See Fig.6 and the invited talk by R. Bryan at this conference.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    See Figs. 7 and 8.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    See Fig. 1 of contribution 1.19 to this conference.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    F. Partovi, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 27, 79 (1964).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fig. 10 (a) shows the part of the potential with the greatest agreement among theories, Fig.10(b) that part with the greatest disagreement, and Fig.10(c) a part with deviation between theories typical of all the remaining potential parts.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    W.N. Cottingham et al, Phys. Rev. D8, 800 (1973).ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    M.H. Partovi and E. Lomon, Phys. Rev. D2, 1999 (1971).ADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    M. Lacombe et al, Phys. Rev. D12, 1495 (1975).ADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    See Fig.4 of contribution P.22 to this conference.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    See “Nucleon Resonances in Nuclei”, Reports on Progress in Physics 39, 1109 (1976).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    See Fig. 2 of contribution 1.14 to this conference.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    R. Handel, M. Dillig and M.G. Huber, Phys. Lett. 30, 1071 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    See Fig. 11, and Fig. 2 of contribution 1.4 to this conference.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    C. De Tar, Phys. Rev. D17, 323 (1978).ADSGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    See Fig. 12.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    V. Matveev and P. Sorba, Lett. Nuov. Cim 20, 435 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    R.L. Jaffe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 195 (1977) and Errata 38, 617 (1977).ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    A.Th.M. Aerts, P.T.G. Mulders and T.T. de Swart, Phys. Rev. D17, 260 (1978).ADSGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    See Fig.1 of contribution 1.31 to this conference.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    See Fig. 2 of contribution 1.31 to this conference.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    M.H. Partovi, MIT preprint CTP 707, March 1978.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    See Fig.1 of contribution 1.3 to this conference.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    See Fig. 9.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hughes et al, Nucl. Phys. A267, 392 (1976).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. L. Lomon
    • 1
  1. 1.Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations