Advertisement

On Polarization Phenomena in Proton-Deuteron Elastic Scattering at Medium and High Energies

  • B. S. Bhakar
  • W. T. H. van Oers
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 87)

Abstract

A series of recent experiments at Argonne National Laboratory has shown that sizable polarizations (≈ 30%) exist in the NN system in the medium- and high-energy region[1]. One may infer that in this energy domain spin effects should also be important in the three nucleon system. A contour diagram of the analyzing power of deuterium for polarized protons in the energy range 10 MeV to 1.5 GeV (Fig. 1) exhibits a great deal of structure for incident proton energies above 300 MeV[2]. The region of large positive analyzing powers at backward angles around 550 MeV may be the key in understanding the observed shoulder in the 180° excitation function and the variation in slope of the backward angular distributions in Nd elastic scattering[3].

Keywords

Elastic Scattering Differential Cross Section Excitation Function Interference Minimum Glauber Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    A. Yokosawa in Nucleon-Nucleon Interactions — 1977, ed. by H. Fearing, D. Measday and A. Strathdee (American Institute of Physics, New York, 1978) p. 59.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    A. N. Anderson et al, Contribution to this Conference.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    B. E. Bonner et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 1253 (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    M. W. McNaughton, private communication.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    M. G. Albrow et al, Phys. Lett. 35B, 247 (1971).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    G. Bunce et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 28, 120 (1972).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    V. Franco, Phys. Rev. Lett. 21, 1360 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    D. R. Harrington, Phys. Rev. Lett. 21, 1496 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. D. R. Harrington, Phys. Lett. 29B, 188 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [9]
    V. Franco and R. J. Glauber, Phys. Rev. Lett. 22, 370 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. [10]
    G. Alberi et al, Lett. Nuovo Cim. 21, 481 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [11]
    M. Levitas and J. V. Noble, Nucl. Phys. A251, 385 (1975).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [12]
    A.K. Kerman and L. S. Kisslinger, Phys. Rev. 180, 1483 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. J. S. Sharma et al, Nucl. Phys. 35B, 466 (1971).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. J. S. Sharma and A. N. Mitra, Phys. Rev. D9, 254 (1974)ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. [13]
    J. C. Aarons and I. H. Sloan, Nucl. Phys. A182, 369 (1972).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [14]
    S. S. Vasan, Phys. Rev. D8, 4092 (1973).ADSGoogle Scholar
  18. [15]
    N. S. Craigie and C. Wilkin, Nucl. Phys. B14, 477 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. C. W. Barry, Ann. Phys. 73, 482 (1972).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. C. W. Barry, Phys. Rev. D7, 1441 (1973).ADSGoogle Scholar
  21. V. M. Kolybasov and N. Ya. Smorodinskaya, Phys. Lett. 37B, 272 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. V. M. Kolybasov and N. Ya. Yad. Fiz. 17, 1211 (1973).Google Scholar
  23. [16]
    A. N. Anderson et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 1553 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. [17]
    Ch. Murtasayev et al, JINR, report P1 — 11285 (1978).Google Scholar
  25. [18]
    G. Alexander et al, Phys. Rev. 154, 1284 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. S. Bhakar
    • 1
  • W. T. H. van Oers
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada

Personalised recommendations