Three-Body Phenomenology for Elementary Particle Systems

  • R. Aaron
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 87)


Today, and for the next several years, the few-body theorist who is willing to confront data directly, has a unique opportunity to make contributions of significance and broad interest in Elementary Particle Physics. The contributed works at this meeting, for the most part, have ignored such possibilities, and rather than review these papers (which speak clearly for themselves), I shall try to present, what I hope, are new horizons for many of you.


Partial Wave Dalitz Plot Partial Wave Analysis Baryon Resonance Phase Shift Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    D. J. Herndon, P. Söding, and R. J. Cashmore, Phys. Rev. D11, 3165 (1975).ADSGoogle Scholar
  2. See also B. H. Brandsen and R. G. Moorhouse, The Pion-Nucleon System (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1973). These authors give a detailed list of earlier references.Google Scholar
  3. 2.
    R. Aaron and R. D. Amado, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, 1157 (1973). The “minimal” equations which implement both unitarity and subenergy analyticity have been discussed by I.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. J. R. Aitchison, Phys. Rev. 137, B1070 (1965).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. R. Aaron and R. D. Amado, Phys. Rev. D13, 2581 (1976).ADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 3.
    These results are byproducts of the πN elastic scattering calculation described in R. Aaron and R. D. Amado, Phys. Rev. Lett. 27, 1316 (1971). For more details of the calculation see.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. R. Aaron, Modern Three-Hadron Physics, edited by A. W. Thomas (Springer, Heidelberg, W. Germany, 1976), Chap. 5. An expanded discussion of the physics of Fig. 1 appears in the Appendix of.Google Scholar
  8. R. Aaron et al., Phys. Rev. D16, 50 (1977).ADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 4.
    D. J. Herndon et al., Phys. Rev. D11, 3183 (1975). Hereafter referred to as BSC.ADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 5.
    R. Aaron, R. D. Amado and J. E. Young, Phys. Rev. 174, 2022 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 6.
    This work has been done in collaboration with R. S. Longacre at Northeastern University, and R. A. Arndt, D. C. Teplitz and V. L. Teplitz at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.Google Scholar
  12. 7.
    Three-pion data: G. Ascoli et al., Phys. Rev. D7, 669 (1973).ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. Yu. M. Antipov et al., Nucl. Phys. B63, 153 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. K*K data: G. Otter et al., Nucl. Phys. B96, 365 (1975).ADSGoogle Scholar
  15. 8.
    J. Penegr, et al., “Evidence for Resonance Behavior of A1 and A3 Mesons Coherently Produced on Nuclei,” paper submitted to the Budapest Conference, 1977.Google Scholar
  16. 9.
    C. Baltay, C. V. Cautis and M. Kalekar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 591 (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 10.
    M. J. Corden et al., Rutherford Laboratory Preprint No. RL-77-139/A.Google Scholar
  18. 11.
    Ph. Gavillet et al., Phys. Lett. 69B, 119 (1977) for K-mesons, and.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. A. Ferrer et al., Phys. Lett. 74B, 287 (1978) for π-mesons.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 12.
    SLAC-LBL Collaboration, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 1120 (1978)[τ → μυῡ and τ̄ → ῡ3π]. PLUTO Collaboration, DESY, H. Meyer, Meeting of the APS-DPF, Argonne 1977 [τ → eυῡ, τ̄ → ῡ3π].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 13.
    See, for example, H. J. Schnitzer, “Spin Structure in Meson Spectroscopy with an Effective Scalar Confinement of Quarks,” Brandeis Preprint (to be published in Phys. Rev. D).Google Scholar
  22. 14.
    L. Stodolsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 973 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 15.
    R. S. Longacre and R. Aaron, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 1509 (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 16.
    R. Aaron, R. S. Longacre and J. E. Sacco, Northeastern University Preprint NUB #2340 (to be published in Annals of Physics, N.Y.).Google Scholar
  25. 17.
    J. B. Bronzan, Phys. Rev. 139, B751 (1965).ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  26. 18.
    R. D. Amado, Phys. Rev. 132, 485 (1963).ADSCrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  27. 19.
    This result is consistent with that of other authors. See for example, R. L. Schult and H. W. Wyld, Phys. Rev. D16, 62 (1977).ADSGoogle Scholar
  28. I. J. R. Aitchison and R. J. A. Golding, Phys. Lett. 59B, 228 (1975).Google Scholar
  29. 20.
    D. Morgan, Contribution to International Conference on High Energy Physics, Palermo, 1975.Google Scholar
  30. M. G. Bowler, M. A. V. Game, I. J. R. Aitchison and J. B. Dainton, Nucl. Phys. B97, 227 (1975).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. J. L. Basdevant and E. L. Berger, Phys. Rev. D16, 657 (1977).ADSGoogle Scholar
  32. 21.
    I. J. R. Aitchison and M. G. Bowler, University of Oxford Preprint #24/77.Google Scholar
  33. 22.
    R. Arnowitt, M. H. Friedman and P. Nath, Phys. Rev. 174, 2008 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 23.
    H. J. Schnitzer and S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. 164, 1828 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 24.
    R. Aaron, H. Goldberg and R. S. Longacre, Northeastern University Preprint NUB #2350 (revised).Google Scholar
  36. 25.
    We interpret Soln E of Basdevant and Berger (Réf. 20) which contains two driving poles as being of this type, with the distant pole corresponding to a short range repulsion.Google Scholar
  37. 26.
    See Ref. 8. The conclusions of these authors disagree with ours. We believe that they are in error for two reasons: (1) They ignored the Deck mechanism altogether. (2) They used the 0 pir partial wave amplitude as a reference. As we have shown in Sec. I, this amplitude is small, varies rapidly over the Dalitz plot, and is poorly determined in partial wave analyses. Clearly, it is a poor choice for a reference amplitude!.Google Scholar
  38. 27.
    D. D. Brayshaw, SLAC-PUB-2094 (March, 1978).Google Scholar
  39. 28.
    H. J. Melosh, Phys. Rev. D9, 1095 (1974).ADSGoogle Scholar
  40. 29.
    F. J. Gilman, M. Kugler and S. Meshkov, Phys. Rev. D9, 715 (1974).ADSGoogle Scholar
  41. 30.
    D. Faiman and J. Rosner, Phys. Lett. 45B, 357 (1973).Google Scholar
  42. 31.
    For results of LBL-SLAC analysis see Ref. 4; the Saclay analysis is described by R. S. Longacre and J. Dolbeau, Nucl. Phys. B122, 493 (1977), and the Imperial College analysis by K. W. J. Parnham et al., submitted to the Topical Conference on Baryon Resonances, Oxford, July 1976. For a review and comparison of the LBL-SLAC, Saclay, and Imperial College analyses, see invited talk by K. W. J. Barnham presented at this conference.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 32.
    D. Faiman, Nucl. Phys. B109, 286 (1976). For a detailed comparison of the fitted amplitudes with theory, see R. S. Longacre and J. Dolbeau, Ref. 31.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 33.
    F. von Hippel and C. Quigg, Phys. Rev. D5, 624 (1972).ADSGoogle Scholar
  45. 34.
    J. Blatt and V. E. Weisskopf, Theoretical Nuclear Physics (Wiley, New York, 1952), p. 361.MATHGoogle Scholar
  46. 35.
    R. S. Longacre, Northeastern University Preprint NUB #2356.Google Scholar
  47. 36.
    J. Orear, Cornell University Preprint #CLNS384.Google Scholar
  48. 37.
    M. G. Olsson and L. Turner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 20, 1127 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 38.
    The spokesman for this experiment is G. A. Rebka.Google Scholar
  50. 39.
    R. Aaron and H. Goldberg (in preparation); see also, Ref. 24.Google Scholar
  51. 40.
    S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 18, 188 (1967).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 41.
    D. Faiman, Nucl. Phys. B115, 478 (1976).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 42.
    See Ref. 41 for theoretical situation and R. S. Longacre and J. Dolbeau, Ref. 31, for experimental status.Google Scholar
  54. 43.
    A. B. Wicklund, ANL-HEP-CP-76-56; Aachen-Berlin-Bonn-CERN Collaboration, Bonn-HE-76-21; Bonn-Hamburg-Munich (MPI) Collaboration, MPI-PAE/Exp.E1.64.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Aaron
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhysicsNortheastern UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations