Advertisement

Polarization Effects in the 3-Body System

  • Gerald G. Ohlsen
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 87)

Abstract

This talk is going to consist mostly of an experimental review of polarization effects in the three-nucleon system. There is a richness of experimental possibilities, many of which have been carried out, that arises from the complex spin structure of the system, i.e., ½ + 1 → ½ + 1 for the elastic process and ½ + 1 → ½ + ½ + ½ for the inelastic or breakup process. Most of the work in the past has been on the elastic process. The emphasis of the present talk, however, will be on the inelastic process, since this would appear to the author to be the most productive area for future work. Discussions of elastic scattering will be limited to special topics about which there has been interesting activity in the last two years or so. The greater emphasis on the breakup process is partly because “exact” calculations are becoming available and partly because available polarized beams make quite a few heretofore unstudied experiments quite feasible.

Keywords

Elastic Scattering Breakup Process Breakup Reaction Coulomb Effect Tensor Analyze Power 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    W. Haeberli, Proc. Int. Conf. on the Three Body Problem, edited by J. S. C. McKee and P. M. Rolph (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1970) p. 188.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. S. C. McKee, Proc. 3rd Int. Symp. on Polarization Phenomena in Nuclear Reactions, edited by H. H. Barschall and W. Haeberli (Univ. Wisconsin, Madison, 1971) p. 73.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. E. Conzett, Proc. Int. Conf. on Few Body Problems in Nuclear and Particle Physics, edited by R. J. Slobodrian, B. Cujeć, and K. Ramatavarum (Les Presses de Université Laval, Quebec, 1975) p. 566.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. Doleschall, Proc. 4th Int. Symp. on Polarization Phenomena in Nuclear Reactions, edited by W. Grüebler and V. König (Birkhauser Verlag, Basel and Stuttgart, 1976) p. 51.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    H. E. Conzett, Proc. of the VII Int. Conf. on Few Body Problems in Nuclear and Particle Physics, edited by A. N. Mitra, I. Slaus, V. S. Bhasin, and V. K. Gupta (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1976) p. 611.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    W. M. Kloet, Proc. Conf. on Nucleon-Nucleon Interaction-1977, edited by D. F. Measday, H. W. Fearing, and A. Strathdee (American Institute of Physics, 1978) p. 392.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    J. Bruinsma, 1977 European Symp. on Few Particle Problems in Nuclear Physics, Potsdam.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. E. Simmons, Proc. Conf. on High Energy Physics and Nuclear Structure, edited by D. Nagle, A. S. Goldhaber, C. K. Hargrove, and R. L. Burman (American Institute of Physics, 1975) p. 103.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    I. T. Lapidus, Proc. Conf. on High Energy Physics and Nuclear Structure (see Ref. 8) p. 129.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    S. Fiarman and S. S. Hanna, Nucl. Phys. A251, 1 (1975).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. D. Amado, M. P. Locher, and M. Simonius, Phys. Rev. C 17, 403 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    R. E. White, W. Grüebler, V. König, R. Risler, A. Ruh, P. A. Schmelzbach, and P. Marmier, Nucl. Phys. A180, 593 (1972).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    W. Grüebler, H. R. Bürgi, V. König, P. A. Schmelzbach, and B. Jenny, these proceedings.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    W. R. Gibbs, Proc. 4th Int. Symp. (see Ref. 4) p. 61.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    W. Grüebler, V. König, P. A. Schmelzbach, T. Stammbach, private communication.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. J. Benayoun, J. Chauvin, C. Gignoux, and A. Laverne, Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 1438 (1976).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    C. Stolk and J. A. Tjon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 985 (1975); Nucl. Phys. A295, 384 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    P. Doleschall, Phys. Lett. 28B, 298 (1972); Phys. Lett. 40B, 443 (1972); Nucl. Phys. A201, 264 (1973); Nucl. Phys. A220, 49 (1974).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    W. Tornow, P. W. Lisowski, R. C. Byrd, and R. L. Walter, Nucl. Phys. A296, 23 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    T. B. Clegg, G. R. Plattner, and W. Haeberli, Nucl. Phys. A119, 238 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    C. Zamudio-Cristi, B. E. Bonner, F. P. Brady, J. A. Jungerman, and J. Wang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, 1009 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    S. W. Bunker, J. M. Cameron, R. F. Carlson, J. R. Richardson, P. Tomas, W. T. H. van Oers, and J. Verba, Nucl. Phys. A113, 461 (1968).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    N. S. P. King, private communication.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    N. S. P. King, J. L. Romero, J. Ullmann, H. E. Conzett, R. M. Larimer, and R. Roy, Phys. Lett. 69B, 151 (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    J. E. Brock, A. Chisholm, J. C. Duder, and R. Garrett, these proceedings.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    J. C. Duder, M. Sosnowski, and D. Melnik, these proceedings and private communication.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    E. O. Alt, W. Sandhas, H. Zankel, and H. Ziegelmann, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 1537 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    E. O. Alt, W. Sandhas, R. H. Ziegelman, Phys. Rev. C 17, 1981 (1978).ADSCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    D. Eyre, A. C. Phillips, and F. Roig, Nucl. Phys. A275, 13 (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    S. C. Pieper, Phys. Rev. Lett. 27, 1738 (1971); Nucl. Phys. A193, 529 (1972); Phys. Rev. C 6, 1157 (1972).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    J. C. Aarons and I. H. Sloan, Nucl. Phys. A182, 369 (1972); Nucl. Phys. A198, 321 (1972).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    P. Doleschall, private communication.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    R. van Wageningen, private communication.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    C. Gignoux, private communication.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    W. Grüebler, V. König, P. A. Schmelzbach, B. Jenny, H. R. Bürgi, P. Doleschall, G. Heidenreich, H. Roser, F. Seiler, and W. Reichart, Phys. Lett. 74B, 173 (1978).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    C. K. Mitchell, thesis, Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory report LA-5412-T (1973).Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    F. D. Correll, G. G. Ohlsen, N. Jarmie, R. A. Hardekopf, and R. E. Brown, work in progress.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    J. Sanada, S. Seki, Y. Tagishi, W. Grüebler, M. Sawada, Y. Nagashima, K. Furuno, and L. S. Chuang, these proceedings.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    A. N. Anderson, J. M. Cameron, P. A. Hutcheon, J. Källne, B. K. S. Koene, B. T. Murdoch, W. T. H. van Oers, and A. W. Stetz, these proceedings.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    N. S. Craigie and C. Wilken, Nucl. Phys. B14, 477 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    G. W. Barry, Phys. Rev. D 7, 1441 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    J. Bruinsma, thesis, Vrije Universiteit te Amsterdam (1976).Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    J. Bruinsma and R. van Wageningen, Phys. Lett. 63B, 19 (1976); Nucl. Phys. A282, 1 (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    C. Stolk and J. A. Tjon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 395 (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    L. D. Knutson, Nucl. Phys. A198, 439 (1972).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    J. Arvieux, J. L. Durand, J. C. Faivre, D. Garreta, A. Papineau, J. Sura, and A. Tarrats, Nucl. Phys. A150, 75 (1970).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    C. O. Blyth, N. T. Okumusoglu, N. Berovic, and J. S. C. McKee, Proc. Int. Conf. on Few Body Problems in Nuclear and Particle Physics, edited by R. J. Slobodrian, B. Cujeć, and K. Ramavatarum (Les Presses de L’Universite Laval, Quebec, 1975) p. 597.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    J. G. Rogers, D. P. Saylor, J. D. Bronson, and M. Jain, Phys. Rev. Lett. 29, 1181 (1972).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    M. Jain, J. G. Rogers, and D. P. Saylor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, 838 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    W. M. Kloet and J. A. Tjon, Nucl. Phys. A210, 380 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    A. M. McDonald, D. I. Bonbright, W. T. H. van Oers, J. W. Watson, J. G. Rogers, J. M. Cameron, J. Soukup, W. M. Kloet, and J. A. Tjon, Fhys. Rev. Lett. 34, 488 (1975).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    A. M. McDonald, thesis, University of Manitoba (1975).Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    L. I. Schiff, Quantum Mechanics (McGraw-Hill, 1955) p. 235.Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    J. Birchall, M. S. DeJong, M. S. A. L. Al-Ghazi, J. S. C. McKee, W. D. Ramsey, and N. Videla, these proceedings.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    J. M. Lambert, P. A. Treado, R. G. Allas, L. A. Beach, R. O. Bondelid, and E. M. Diener, Phys. Rev. C 13, 43 (1976).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    N. Fujiwara, E. Hourany, H. Nakamura-Yokoto, F. Reide, and T. Yasua, Phys. Rev. C 15, 4 (1977).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    J. Kecskeméti and B. Zeitnitz, preprint KFKI-1977-114.Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    W. Ebenhöh, Nucl. Phys. A191, 97 (1972).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    F. N. Rad, L. C. Northcliffe, J. G. Rogers, and D. P. Saylor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, 57 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    F. N. Rad, L. C. Northcliffe, D. P. Saylor, J. G. Rogers, and R. G. Graves, Phys. Rev. C 8, 1248 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    R. G. Graves, M. Jain, H. D. Knox, E. P. Chamberlin, and L. C. Northcliffe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 917 (1975).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    L. C. Northcliffe, private communication.Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    G. G. Ohlsen, Rep. Prog. Phys. 34, 717 (1972).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    B. E. Bonner, J. E. Simmons, T. S. Bhatia, G. Glass, J. C. Hiebert, L. C. Northcliffe, P. J. Riley, C. L. Hollas, and C. R. Newsom, private communication.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    C. Amsler, R. C. Brown, D. V. Bugg, J. A. Edgington, C. Oram, D. Axen, R. DuBois, L. Felawka, S. Jaccardi, R. Keeler, J. Vavra, A. Clough, D. Gibsen, G. A. Ludgate, N. M. Stewert, L. P. Robertson, and J. R. Richardson, Nucl. Instr. ξ Meth. 144, 401 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    R. L. Walter, R. C. Byrd, P. W. Lisowski, and T. B. Clegg, Proc. 4th Int. Symp. on Polarization Phenomena in Nuclear Reactions, edited by W. Grüebler and V. König (Birkhauser Verlag, Basel and Stuttgart, 1976) p. 489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    P. W. Lisowski, R. C. Byrd, R. L. Walter, and T. B. Clegg, to be published.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    F. N. Rad, H. E. Conzett, R. Roy, and F. Seiler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 1134 (1975).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    J. Sanada, S. Seki, Y. Aoki, M. Sawada, Y. Tagishi, and L. A. Chuang, these proceedings.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    R. Fischer, H. Dobiasch, B. Haesner, H. O. Klages, R. Maschuw, P. Schwarz, and B. Zeitnitz, these proceedings.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    F. N. Rad, R. Roy, H. E. Conzett, R. M. Larimer, B. T. Leeman, P. Von Rossen, and E. J. Stephenson, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 23, 602 (1978).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerald G. Ohlsen
    • 1
  1. 1.Los Alamos Scientific LaboratoryUniversity of CaliforniaLos AlamosUSA

Personalised recommendations