Values, technology and work

  • Enid Mumford
Information Systems And Organization
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 65)


Goal Attainment Government Department Work Organization User User System Design Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Parsons, T. and Shils, E. (1951) Towards a General Theory of Action; Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Menzies, K. (1976) Talcott Parsons and the Social Image of Man, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Neal, M.A. (1965) Values and Interests in Social Change. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Friedmann, J. (1967) "A conceptual model for the analysis of planning behaviour', Administrative Science Quarterly. Vol. 12 (2) 225–252.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Steiner, G. (1969) Top Management Planning, New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    McCaskey, M.B. (1974) ‘A contingency approach to planning: planning with goals and without goals'. Academy of Management Journal. Vol. 17 (2) 281–289.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Vickers, G. (1973) Making Institutions Work, London: Associated Business Programmes.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sackman, H. (1971) Mass Information Utilities and Social Excellence, New York: Aurbach.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gross, L. (1967) Sociological Theory: Inquiries and Paradigms: New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Edstrom, A. and Nanges, L. (1974) ‘The implementation of computer based information systems under varying structural conditions'. Paper presented to Altorg Conference, Gothenburg.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mumford, E. (1978) ‘The design of work: new approaches and new needs'. Paper presented at IFAC Conference, Enschede, Holland, 1977.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hedberg, B. Nystrom, P. and Starbuck, W. (1976) ‘Camping on Seesaws: prescriptions for a self-designing organization', Administrative Science Quarterly. Vol. 21 (1) 41–62.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Edstrom, A. (1974) Op. Cit. ‘Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    White, J.K. and Ruh, R.A. (1973) ‘The effects of personal values on the relationship between participation and job attitudes'. Administrative Science Quarterly. Vol. 18 (4) 506–514.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Touraine, A. (1974) The Post-Industrial Society, London: Wildwood House.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fitzgerald, T.H. (1971) ‘Why motivation theory doesn't work'. Harvard Business Review. July–August.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gowler, D. and Legge, K. (1972) ‘Occupational role development, part one'. Personnel Review. Vol. 1. (2) 12–27.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Leavitt, H. (1958) Managerial Psychology, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fox, A. (1974) Beyond Contract: Work, Power and Trust Relations. London: Faber.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Smelser, N. (1959) Social Change in the Industrial Revolution. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Davis, L.E. (1971) ‘Job satisfaction research: the post-industrial view', Industrial Relations, Vol. 10. 176–193.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schon, D.A. (1967) Technology and Change. London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kuhn, T.S. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Parsons, T. (1964) The Social System. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hedberg, B. (1975) ‘Computer systems to support industrial democracy’ in E. Mumford and H. Sackman (Eds.) Human Choice and Computers. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fox, A. (1974) Op. Cit. ‘Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Enid Mumford
    • 1
  1. 1.Reader in Organisational Sociology Manchester Business SchoolEngland

Personalised recommendations