Advertisement

Implications for nuclear physics

Part IV. Refinements and Ramifications
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 81)

Keywords

Binding Energy Atomic Nucleus Shell Model Heavy Nucleus Fission Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References for Chapter 20.

  1. 1.
    For example, see D. H. Wilkinson, Proc. Rutherford Jubilee Conf., London (1961), p. 339; also see Clustering Phenomena in Nuclei, IAEA, Vienna (1969).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    See references 4 through 12 in Ref. 5 of the present chapter.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    This same assumption was also made in connection with Eq. (19.15).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    This is the coulomb repulsion that is calculated from the configuration of Eq. (20.3) by using Eq. (19.8).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    M. H. Mac Gregor, Nuovo Cimento 36A, 113 (1976).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    L. Pauling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 15, 499 and 868 (1965); Phys. Rev. 182, 1357 (1969); Nature 208, 174 (1965); Science 150, 297 (1965).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    See J. M. Ziman, Principles of the Theory of Solids, Cambridge (1972), p. 353.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. K. Chang et al., Phys. Rev. C10, 2467 (1974).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    C. E. Bemis, Jr., et al., Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 22, 611 (1977).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    The 10Ne20, 12Mg24, and 14Si28 shapes are from the (p,p) measurements of R. de Swiniarski et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 317 (1969); the 69 Tm166 shape is from. K. E. G. Löbner et al., Nuclear Data Tables A7, 495 (1970); the 72 Hfsu178 shape is from D. L. Hendrie et al., Phys. Lett. 26B, 127 (1968); the 90Th230 and 92U238 shapes are from F. K. Mc Gowan et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 27, 1741 (1971).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. H. Wapstra and N. B. Gove, Nuclear Data Tables 9, 267 (1971).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. H. Johnson and E. Teller, Phys. Rev. 93, 357 (1954); P. B. Jones, Phil. Mag. 3, 33 (1958); R. G. Seyler and C. H. Blanchard, Phys. Rev. 131, 355 (1963)Google Scholar
  13. 12.a
    E. H. S. Burhop, Nucl. Phys. B1, 438 (1967); H. A. Bethe, Phys. Rev. 167, 879 (1968).Google Scholar
  14. 13.
    Y. N. Kim, Mesic Atoms and Nuclear Structure, North-Holland, New York (1971), especially Ch. 5, Sec. 2.Google Scholar
  15. 14.
    C. E. Wiegand, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 1235 (1969).Google Scholar
  16. 15.
    See R. D. Evans, The Atomic Nucleus, McGraw-Hill, New York (1955), p. 30.Google Scholar
  17. 16.
    H. J. Körner and J. P. Schiffer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 27, 1457 (1971).Google Scholar
  18. 17.
    G. W. Greenlees et al., Phys. Rev. 171, 1115 (1968).Google Scholar
  19. 18.
    D. H. Davis et al., Nucl. Phys. Bl, 434 (1967); W. M. Bugg et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, 475 (1973); W. M. Bugg et al., Nucl. Phys. B64, 29 (1973); W. M. Bugg et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 611 (1975).Google Scholar
  20. 19.
    M. Leon and R. Seki, Phys. Lett. 48B, 173 (1974) and Nucl. Phys. B74, 68 (1974).Google Scholar
  21. 20.
    Y. Iwasaki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 1464 (1976); S. Frankel et al., ibid. 36, 642 (1976); M. de Llano and A. Plastino, ibid. 37, 556 (1976); J. Stevenson et al., ibid. 38, 1125 (1977).Other experiments are discussed in Ref. 5.Google Scholar
  22. 21.
    V. G. Lind et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 479 (1974).Google Scholar
  23. 22.
    L. Głowacka et al., Nucl. Phys. A284, 257 (1977).Also see A. G. Flowers et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 40, 709 (1978).Google Scholar
  24. 23.
    M. H. Mac Gregor, LLL report UCRL-8.0467 (Rev. I), “Negative Masses, Photons, and *Ψ Probability Fields”, December (1977).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1978

Personalised recommendations