Advertisement

Part A: An introduction to unification

(Mirror-symmetry, confinement versus liberation, unifying mass-scale etc.
  • Jogesh C. Pati
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 77)

Keywords

Yukawa Coupling Local Symmetry Spontaneous Symmetry Breaking Gauge Coupling Constant Spontaneous Breakdown 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and footnotes

  1. 1.
    C. N. Yang and R. C. Mills, Phys. Rev. D96, 191 (1954).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. Schwinger, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 2, 407 (1957); S. L. Glashow, Nucl. Phys. 22, 57a (1961); Abdus Salam and J. C. Ward, Physics Letters 13, 168 (1964). In the present context, the model based on spontaneous breakdown of the local symmetry SU(2)L x U(1) is due to S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19, 1264 (1967) and Abdus Salam, in Elementary Particle Theory, Nobel Symposium, Ed. by N. Svartholm (Almgvist, Stockholm, 1968), p. 367.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. C. Pati and Abdus Salam, Phys. Rev. D8, 1240 (1973); Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, 661 (1973); Phys. Rev. D10, 275 (1974), and Physics Letters 58B, 333 (1975).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. Georgi and S. L. Glashow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 438 (1974); H. Fritzsch and P. Minkowski, Ann. Phys. (NY) 93, 193 (1975); F. Gürsey and P. Sikivie, Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 775 (1976); P. Ramond, Nucl. Phys. B110, 214 (1976).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    These attempts are admittedly incomplete, until gravity is in the picture.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    In general, if G is a direct product of several groups, correspondingly several coupling constants would appear.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    P. W. Higgs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 12, 132 (1964); P. Englert and R. Brout, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 321 (1964); G. S. Guralnik, C. R. Hagen and T. W. B. Kibble, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 585 (1965); P. W. Higgs, Phys. Rev. 145, 1156 (1966); T. W. B. Kibble, Phys. Rev. 155, 1554 (1967).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    J. Goldstone, Nuovo Cim. 19, 15 (1961); Y. Nambu, G. Jona-Lasinio, Phys. Rev. 122, 345 (1961); 124, 246 (1961); J. Goldstone, A. Salam and S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. 127, 965 (1962).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    One still needs to examine if quantum-corrections could disturb the character of the ground state of the theory (see e.g. S. Coleman and E. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D7, 1888 (1973)).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    G' t Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B33, 173 (1971); B35, 167 (1971); B. W. Lee and J. Zinn-Justin, Phys. Rev. D5, 3121, 3137 (1972).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    See for example, J. M. Cornwall, D. N. Levin and G. Tiktopoulos, Phys. Rev. Letters, 30, 1268 (1973); C. H. Llewellyn Smith, University of Hawaii Summer School Lecture Notes (1973) and references therein.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    See for example R. N. Mohapatra, S. Sakakibara and J. Sucher, Phys. Rev. D10, 1844 (1974).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    As to whether spontaneous symmetry breaking is entirely due to the presence of elementary Higgs-scalars, or whether it is partly or entirely induced dynamically is not yet clear.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    If potential V(φ) has a global symmetry higher than the local symmetry, one needs to examine whether light pseudo goldstone bosons are generated in the theory.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. Gross and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 1343 (1973); H. D. Politzer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 1346 (1973).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    See for example H. D. Politzer “Testing of Scaling and QCD with muon Beams”, HUTP-77/A038 and references therein; G. Altarelli, G. Parisi and R. Petronzio, Physics Letters 63B, 183 (1976).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    S. Abers and B. W. Lee, Physics Reports 19C, (1973); M.A.B. Bég and A. Sirlin, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Science, 24, 379 (1974). C. Llewellynsmith, Hawaii University Lecture Notes (1973). S. Weinberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 46, No. 2, (1976).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Recent CDHS measurements yield sin2θW = 0.24 ± 0.02(M. Holder et. al. CERN Preprint, 1977). Earlier measurements, gave somewhat higher values for sin2σW, see for example, J. Blietschau et.al., Nucl. Phys. B118, 218 (1977); B. Barish et. al., Proc. Internat. Neutrino Conf. Aachen, 1976 (p. 289); A. Benvenuti et. al., Proc. Internat. Neutrino Conf. Aachen, 1976 (P. 296).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    J. Blietschau et. al., Nucl. Phys. B118, 218 (1977); H. Faissner et. al., reports of Aachen-Padova results at Aachen, Tbilisi and Ben-Lee Memorial Conference (1977).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    C. Bouchiat, J. Iliopoulos and P. Meyer, Phys. Lett. 38B, 519 (1972).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    H. Georgi and S. L. Glashow, Phys. Rev. D6, 429 (1972).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    D. J. Gross and R. Jackiw, Phys. Rev. D6, 477 (1972).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    See for example the first paper of Ref. 3 where the relevant Yukawa interaction is written down.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    S. Glashow, J. Iliopoulos and L. Maiani, Phys. Rev. D2, 1285 (1970).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    R. N. Mohapatra, J. C. Pati and P. Vinciarelli, Phys. Rev. D8, 3652 (1973); S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31, 494 (1973).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    A. I. Vainshtein and I. B. Khriplovich, JETP Letters 18, 141 (1973); M. G. Gaillard and B. W. Lee, Phys. Rev. D10, 897 (1974).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    G. Goldhaber et. al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 569 (1976). For a recent review, see the report by A. M. Litke, Invited Talk, European Physical Society Meeting, held at Budapest (July, 1977), SLAC-PUB-2024.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    B. Wiik, Lectures presented at Cargese summer school, 1977.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    See e.g. C. Baltay et. al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 62 (1977) and references therein.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    E. G. Cazzoli et. al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 1125 (1975); G. Blietschau et. al., Phys. Lett. 60B, 207 (1975); J. Von Krogh et. al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 710 (1976).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    “Color” was first introduced implicitly through paraquarks of order three by 0. W. Greenberg, Phys. Rev. Letters, 13, 598 (1964), and subsequently explicitly through three triplets of quarks, by M. Han and Y. Nambu, Phys. Rev. 139, B1006 (1965) and P.G.O. Freund, Phys. Letters 15, 352 (1965). “Explicit” Color, which in general permits either solution for quark-charges (integral or fractional), appears to be needed for the generation of local SU(3)'-color-gauge interactions. [A straightforward formulation to generate Yang-Mills gauge interactions in the parafield-theory generates SO(3) rather than local color SU(3)-symmetry: see P. G. 0. Freund, Phys. Rev. D13, 2322 (1976), and also remarks by O. W. Greenberg and C. A. Nelson, Physics Reports 32C, Page 88 (1977)].Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    J. C. Pati and C. H. Woo, Phys. Rev. D3, 2920 (1971); K. Miura, T. Minamikawa, Prog. Theor. Phys. 38, 954 (1967). Plausible arguments for K-decays were given by C. A. Nelson and K. J. Sebastian, Phys. Rev. D8, 3144 (1973).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    M. K. Gaillard and B. W. Lee, Phys. Rev. Letters 33, 108 (1974); G. Altarelli and L. Maiani, Phys. Letters 52B, 351 (1974).Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    The first suggestion of using SU(3)′-Color-gauges to generate superstrong interactions, with additional interactions generating strong (or medium strong) interactions, is due to Han and Nambu (Ref. 31).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    The first suggestion of a renormalisable gauge theory of weak, electromagnetic and strong interaction using flavor to generate basic weak and SU(3)′-Color to generate basic strong interactions (via the gauge structure SU(2)L x U(1) x SU(3)′Col was made by J. C. Pati and A. Salam (Aug, 1972, unpublished), work reported by J. D. Bjorken, Proceedings of the 1972 Batavia Conference (Vol. 2, Page 304). The same local symmetry permits either solution for quark-charges depending upon the nature of spontaneous symmetry breaking (see text). This work is elaborated in the first paper of Ref. 3.Google Scholar
  36. 36.a
    The hypothesis that local color symmetry remains unbroken, and that color is confined was proposed in stages by H. Fritzsch, M. GellMann and H.Leutwyler, Physics Letters B47,365 (1973).Google Scholar
  37. 36b.
    S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Letters 31, 494 (1973) and D. J. Gross and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. D8, 3633 (1973). See also, C. Itoh, et. al. (Preprint, 1973, unpublished).Google Scholar
  38. 37.
    0. W. Greenberg and D. Zwanziger, Phys. Rev. 150, 1177 (1966); H. J. Lipkin, Phys. Lett. 45B, 267 (1973).Google Scholar
  39. 38.
    For a good review of the color-hypothesis and its various versions, see 0. W. Greenberg and C. A. Nelson. Physics Reports 32C (1977).Google Scholar
  40. 39.
    J. C. Pati, Phys. Rev. D4, 2143 (1971); J. C. Pati and A. Salam, Trieste Report IC/73/81, A. D. Dolgov, L. B. Okun, and V. I. Zacharov) Phys. Lett. 47B, 258 (1973). Breaking global SU(9) via Higgs mechanism would require a rather elaborate set of Higgs-scalars, such a large global symmetry would inevitably generate a large number of light pseudoGoldstone bosons. Thus spontaneous breakdown of global SU(9) is unlikely to remove the SU(9)-difficulty discussed in the text.Google Scholar
  41. 40.
    A number of such models were proposed in the early stages of model building. See the last two references in Ref. 39 for a listing of references on these models.Google Scholar
  42. 41.
    In such a theory, spontaneous symmetry breaking may still induce a mixing between flavor and color-gauge particles; such mixing in turn may generate a color-nonsinglet component in the weak-current.Such a theory, in which color is “brought” into weak interactions only through spontaneous symmetry breaking, differs drastically from the one in which the basic weak interactions use the color-symmetry, prior to spontaneous symmetry breaking. In particular, the former does not suffer from the SU(9)-difficulty. See discussions later for other characteristic features of such a theory pertaining to leptoproduction experiments.Google Scholar
  43. 42.
    In general, if there is an abelian U(l)-factor contributing to electric charge, SU(3)′-generators (F'3 and F'8) may contribute to electric charge with arbitrary coefficients associated with them. This arbitrariness is removed,once the symmetry (e.g. Go) is embedded within a nonabelian local symmetry; and the constraint that an effective good global SU(3)-Color Symmetry must be preserved (despite the breaking of the local SU(3)-Color Symmetry) is imposed.(See discussions in Ref. 43).Google Scholar
  44. 43.
    R. N. Mohapatra, J. C. Pati and A. Salam, Phys. Rev. D13, 1733 (1976).Google Scholar
  45. 44.
    See Ref. 35 for details.Google Scholar
  46. 45.
    J. C. Pati and A. Salam, Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 11 (1976); G. Rajasekharan and P. Roy, Pramana 6, 303 (1975); V. Elias, J. C. Pati, A. Salam and J. Strathdee, Pramana 8, 303 (1977).Google Scholar
  47. 46.
    See Ref. 45 and J. C. Pati, “Unification-Liberation of Quarks and Leptons”, Univ. of Md. Tech. Rep. 77-073; Proceedings of the 1976 Scotthish University Summer School Lecture Notes ed. by I. M. Barbour and A. T. Davies (Pages 89–145, 1976). An account of the “Philosophical” implications of partial versus absolute confinement may be found in J. C. Pati and Abdus Salam, “Lepton-Hadron-Unification”, Proceedings of the 1976 Aachen Neutrino Conference, ed. by H. Faissner, H. Reithler and P. Zerwas (Pages 589–629, see especially Sec. V).Google Scholar
  48. 47.
    See for example, B. Barish, Particles and Fields, 1974 (APS/DPF-Williamsburg), ed. C. E. Carlson (AIP, New York, 1975).Google Scholar
  49. 48.
    L. L. Lewis, et. al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 795 (1977); P. E. G. Baird, et. al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 798 (1977).Google Scholar
  50. 49.
    For a review on present experimental and theoretical status, including calculations of shielding effect, see P. Sandars, Invited Talk at Ben Lee Memorial Conference, held at Batavia, Illinois (Oct., 1977), To appear in the Proceedings.Google Scholar
  51. 50.
    The possibility of observable fractionally charged quarks, though logically permissible, is disfavored within quark-lepton unifying symmetries (without abelian U(1)-factors), unless massless gluons are seen; as for such symmetries, color-gluons can acquire mass and yet an effective good SU(3)-color global symmetry can emerge, provided quarks acquire integer-charges (See Ref. 43 and discussions in Ch. IV).Google Scholar
  52. 51.
    See for example H. D. Politzer (Ref. 16); H. Georgi and H. D. Politzer “Clean Tests of QCD in μp-Scattering (HUTP-77/A063). For tests pertaining to jet-structure, see H. Georgi and M. Machacek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 1237 (1977); G. Steerman and S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 1436 (1977), and E. Farhi, Phys. Rev. Lett. Vol. 39, 1587 (1977).Google Scholar
  53. 52.
    Abdus Salam and J. Strathdee propose that spin-2 multiplet should play a vital role in generating partial or absolute confinement (Trieste Preprints, 1977). The link between Yang-Mills spin-1 and Einstein-Weyl spin-2 gauge-theories remains to be understood, quite independently of the question of whether spin-2 exchange produces confinement or not.Google Scholar
  54. 53.
    The first such calculation utilising the Georgi-Glashow SU(5)-model (Ref. 4) for illustration, was carried out by H. Georgi, H. R. Quinn and S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 451 (1974).Google Scholar
  55. 54.
    S. W. Herb et. al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 252 (1977); W. R. Innis, et. al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 39, 1249 (1977).Google Scholar
  56. 55.
    F. Gürsey and P. Sikivie; and P. Ramond (Ref. 4).Google Scholar
  57. 56.
    The example is fictitious, because with p and n-quarks having charges +1 and 0, the proton acquires a charge +2. This feature is remedied yet the essential content of the illustration leading to a correlation between quark and lepton-charges is retained-once quarks are assigned color as well as flavor (see discussions in Ch. IV).Google Scholar
  58. 57.
    V. Elias, Phys. Rev. D14, 1896 (1976); ibid Phys. Rev. D16, 1586 (1977); ibid Phys. Rev. D (To be published); F. J. Yndurdin, Nucl. Phys. B115, 293 (1976). M. Chanowitz, J. Ellis and M. K. Gaillard, CERN preprint TH-2312 (1977), To appear in Nuclear Physics.Google Scholar
  59. 58.
    V. Elias, J. C. Pati and Abdus Salam, “Unification of The Basic Particle Forces at a Mass-Scale of order 1000 mW”, Univ. of Md. Tech. Rep. 78-041 (Sept., 1977).Google Scholar
  60. 59.
    A compulsive explanation would require an opriori understanding of the ratio of the unifying mass-scale M and themass of the weak boson mW (100 GeV).Google Scholar
  61. 60.
    For weak/electromagnetic symmetries other than SU(2)L x U(1) (e.g. SU(2)L x SU(2)R x U(1)L+R, see later), one can still define a parameter analogous to θW.Google Scholar
  62. 61.
    R. N. Mohapatra and J. C. Pati, Phys. Rev. Dll, 566, 2558 (1975).Google Scholar
  63. 62.
    J. C. Pati and Abdus Salam, Phys. Letters, 58B, 333 (1975); J. C. Pati, Proc. Second Orbis Scientae, Coral Gables, Florida, Jan., 1975 (p. 253–256), ed. by A. Perlmutter ands. Widmayer.Google Scholar
  64. 63.
    H. Fritzsch and P. Minkowski, Ann. Phys. (NY) 93, 193 (1975).Google Scholar
  65. 64.
    The basic distinction between the patterns I and II arises under the presumption that Fermi mass-matrix, generated by spontaneous symmetry breaking would mix −FL with FR and −Fm L with FR m with little or (in the extreme case) no mixing between F and Fm. [See also remarks later about the difficulty of generating Fermi masses for Case II].Google Scholar
  66. 65.
    The decays of mirror FFm-composites to normal hadrons made of −FF-components would in this case be governed by a super Zweig rule.Google Scholar
  67. 66.
    J, C. Pati and Abdus Salam: “SU(8) x SU(8)“-unpublished notes; J. C. Pati, Abdus Salam and J. Strathdee, Nuovo Cimento 26, 72 (1975).Google Scholar
  68. 67.
    See for example G. Feinberg and J. Sucher, Phys. Rev. Letters, 13, 1740 (1975); J. D. Jackson, invited talk at the American Physical Society Meeting, Budapest (July, 1977), CERN-Preprint (1977), To appear in the Proceedings.Google Scholar
  69. 68.
    The consistency of this hypothesis and other general consequences of low-mass axial color-gluons are being examined in collaboration with J. Sucher.Google Scholar
  70. 69.
    V. Elias, J. C. Pati and Abdus Salam, In preparation (1977).Google Scholar
  71. 70.
    The symmetries [SU(5)]4 and [SU(6)]4 belonging to this class have been considered (J. C. Pati and Abdus Salam, unpublished), see also Ref. 46.The [SU(5)]4 symmetry has been studied in some detail by S. Rajpoot (Ph.D. Thesis, Imperial College, 1977).Google Scholar
  72. 71.
    M. L. Perl et. a1., Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 1489 (1975). For a good review of the recent experimental status covering SPEAR and DORIS-experiments, see M. L. Perl, invited talk presented at the Photon-Lepton-Symposium, Hamburg, W. Germany (August, 1977), SLAC-PUB 2022 (1977). The review emphasises the compatibility of the data with the heavy lepton-interpretation; the equally viable quark-interpretation of the data is not considered in this review. (The quark versus heavy lepton origins for the (\(\bar \mu\)e)-events are considered in Ch. IV).Google Scholar
  73. 72.
    Barring large mixing of F and Fm via Fermi mass-matrix, which would, in general, lead to “unnatural” violations of quantum numbers as well as of β-decay versus μ-decay and μ versus e universalities. Small mixing-e.g. of vo e and Eo-can be present. Such mixing may indeed account naturally for the masslessness or small mass of the physical neutrinos (νe and vμ).[Consider the possibility that vo e — diagonal mass element α2MEo and the non-diagonal (νe oEo)-mixing mass is αmEo. Such a massmatrix would generate a massless eigenstate; the mixing angle would however be tiny (0(a)) and thus compatible with the observed universalities. These considerations will be elaborated in a note under preparation.]Google Scholar
  74. 73.
    The prequark-hypothesis has been considered in different forms. For gauge motivated considerations, see J. C. Pati and A. Salam, Phys. Rev. D10, 275 (1974), Footnote 7; 1975 Palermo Conference Proceedings, ed. by A. Zichichi (page); J. C. Pati, A. Salam and J. Strathdee, Phys. Lett. 59B, 265 (1975) and Supplement Trieste Preprint IC/75/139/ (unpublished). The hypothesis under other motivations has been considered by W. Krolikowski, Nuovo Cim. 72, 645 (1972); J. D. Bjorken (private communications, 1973, unpublished); C. H. Woo (private communications 1974, unpublished); K. Matumoto, Prog. Theor. Phys. 52, 1973 (1974);, and 0. W. Greenberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 1120 (1975). Certain Perturbative dynamical calcualtions testing the compataibility of the hypothesis has recently been carried out by E. Nowak, J. Sucher and C. H. Woo (Phys. Rev. D. To be published).Google Scholar
  75. 74.
    J. C. Pati (Ref. 46, Page 109 of the Proceedings). The same constraint follows by demanding that the physical weak currents satisfy left-right symmetry, which would require that the left and right Cabibbo-like angles be equal up to 0(a)-corrections (M.A.B. Beg, R. Budny, R. N. Mohapatra and A. Sirlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38, 1252 (1977)).Google Scholar
  76. 75.
    M. Holder et al., Phys. Rev. Letters, 39, 433 (1977).Google Scholar
  77. 76.
    M.A.B. Beg, and A. Zee, Phys. Rev. Letters 30, 675 (1973). For a list of references on other vector-like models see R. M. Barnett, Review talk, Proceedings of the Brookhaven APS meeting (Sept. 1976).Google Scholar
  78. 77.
    Skewness angles, arising due to F-F' mixing, are assumed to be small for reasons mentioned before (see also Ref. 74).Google Scholar
  79. 78.
    A Bervenutti et al., Phys. Rev. Letters 37., 1039 (1976); J. Blietschau et al., Preprint CERN/EP/Phys 76–55; B. C. Barish et al. (CALT-68-544). The clearest distinction is shown by elastic scattering data (i.e. measurements of σ(\(\bar v\)p→\(\bar v\)p) versus σ(vp→vp); D. Cline et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 252 648 (1976) and W. Lee et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 186 (1976).Google Scholar
  80. 79.
    Precise limit would depend upon low-momentum effective X-coupling constant. This is being studied by V. Elias.Google Scholar
  81. 80.
    Technically, the scalar mass terms need not respect the discrete symmetries; since such terms, having dimension two, induce only finite corrections to coupling constants. However, aesthetically they should.Google Scholar
  82. 81.
    G. Senjanovic and R. N. Mohapatra, Phys. Rev. D12, 1502 (1975).Google Scholar
  83. 82.
    The discussion on the spontaneous breaking of [SU(4)]4 follows a recent paper by V. Elias, J. C. Pati and A. Salam, “Light Neutral Z°-Boson In the PETRA and PEP Energy Range Within the Unifying Symmetry [SU(4)]4”, Univ. of Md. Tech. Rep. No. 78-043 (Nov. 1977).Google Scholar
  84. 83.
    As to whether an allowed minimum of the potential (subject to the parameters being in a given range) will permit such different patterns of VEV for fields transforming similarly (e.g. Li, Ei and Mi), remains to be examined.Google Scholar
  85. 84.
    Two multiplets, related by discrete symmetries, may well have unequal vacuum expectation values (see e.g. Ref. 81).Google Scholar
  86. 85.
    H. Fritzsch and P. Minkowski, Nucl. Phys. B103, 61 (1976); R. N. Mohapatra and D. P. Sidhu, Phys. Rev. Letters 38, 667 (1977); A. DeRujula, H. Georgi and S. L. Glashow, Preprint (1977); J. C. Pati, S. Rajpoot and Abdus Salam, Imperial College Preprint ICTP/76/11 (Phys. Rev. D To be published).Google Scholar
  87. 86.
    The possible importance of the group SU(2)L x SU(2)R x U(1)L x U(1)R has been emphasized by J. C. Pati (Ref. 62), J. C. Pati, S. Rajpoot and Abdus Salam (Ref. 85, Footnote 15). Recently its consequences have been emphasized in some detail by Q. Shafi and Ch. Wetterich, Univ. of Freiburg Preprint (Oct., 1977), and by V. Elias, J. C. Pati and Abdus Salam (Ref. 82).Google Scholar
  88. 87.
    J. C. Pati, S. Rajpoot and Abdus Salam, ICTP/76/11 (Phys. Rev. D to be published), ibid ICTP/76/15 (Physics Letters, To be published). H. S. Mani, J. C. Pati, S.' Rajpoot and Abdus Salam, Trieste Preprint IC/77/88 (Physics Letters To be published).Google Scholar
  89. 88.
    R. Cahn and F. Gilman (SLAC-PUB 1977). The analogous calculations for the left-right symmetric model allowing for its generality (see Ref. 87), has been recently carried out by Mr. A. Janah at Univ. of Md. (To be published).Google Scholar
  90. 89.
    J. Leveille, Imperial College Preprint (Dec. 1977).Google Scholar
  91. 90.
    This is proved in its full generality for the SU(2)L x SU(2)Rx U(1)L+R-model by J. C. Pati, S. Rajpoot and A. Salam (Ref. 87); the equivalence for the special case of vanishing atomic parity violation was shown by H. Fritzsch and P. Minkowski (Ref. 85). Recently, the result has been further generalized to encompass bigger group structures by H. Georgi and S. Weinberg, Harvard Preprint (HUTP-77/AO52).Google Scholar
  92. 91.
    K. Bardacki, M. B. Halpern, Phys. Rev. D6, 696 (1972). B. De Witt, Nucl. Phys. B51, 237 (1973).Google Scholar
  93. 92.
    R. N. Mohapatra and J. C. Pati, Physics Letters, 63B, 204 (1976).Google Scholar
  94. 93.
    Recently attempts have been made to give mass to color-gluons (with fractionally charged quarks), e.g. by A. De Rujula and R. Jaffe, Harvard Preprint (1977). Such a possibility, it seems, cannot however be entertained within a unified theory of quarks and leptons for reasons mentioned in the text (See Ref. 92 for details). A number of interesting results obtained by these authors can be carried over, however, to the case of unconfined integer-charge quarks, developed in Ref. 3.Google Scholar
  95. 94.
    J. C. Pati, Abdus Salam and S. Sakakibara, Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 1229 (1976); J. C. Pati, S. Sakakibara and Abdus Salam, “The Missing Quark Mystery” Trieste Preprint IC/75/93 (unpublished). These two papers should be referred to for details on quark and proton-decay considerations.Google Scholar
  96. 95.
    The q → \(\ell \ell \bar \ell\)decay modes proceed through tree diagrams, which are damped by two heavy mass propagators, where as the loop-diagram Fig. 5(a) is damped by only one heavy mass-propagator mx −2. The decay mode-such as q → e π+ involving emission of a charged lepton,proceed either via tree or via loop-diagrams with pion-emission from inside the loop. (Compare with Fig. 5(c)). Given that pion is a q−q-composite, such loopdiagrams would also be damped (compared to the loop-diagram shown in Fig. 5(c)), if the emission of composite pion from the quark-line is governed by a form-factor ∞ (1/(k2−m2)). See Ref. 94 for details of these arguments.Google Scholar
  97. 96.
    The ratio of the amplitudes of W14 versus W L-loops (see Fig. 5(c) and 5(a)) is given by [c2 4Rlln(mX/mW 14)][clc4kn(mX/mW L+)]−l, assuming that WL + mixes with X (rather than WR+ of the GIM SU(2)R group).[Noting that VEV of B and C-multiplets are interchangeable due to the L ~> R Symmetry in the theory (See Eq. (73)), W+ R can mix with X rather than WL +. Decays of charged red quarks into charged leptons via the two step process (see section 4.6) would exhibit V + A or V-A coupling depending upon whether it is WL + or WR +, which mixes with X (see Ref. 94 for details)].Google Scholar
  98. 97.
    Hadrons of 2–3 GeV mass are not expected to have pair production crosssection at ISR-Fermilab energies much bigger than = 10−30 cm2, as judged from the empirical observation of J/ϕ—production (e.g.).Google Scholar
  99. 98.
    The best empirical “lower limit” on proton-lifetime at present is 2 × 1030 years (F. Reines and M. Crouch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32, 493 (1974) and see references therein).The above search is sensitive to energetic μ+ s, which may be expected to arise especially from an assumed two-body decay mode of the proton (p → μ+ πo). For a suggestion on decay-mode independent search based on geochemical methods, see S. P. Rosen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 774 (1975). Recent decay-mode independent searches, yielding proton lifetime limits ≥ 2.2 × 1026yr years, have been made by R. I. Steinberg and J. C. Evans, Jr., Invited Paper, Neutrino-Conference, Elbrus, USSR (1977) and Science 197, 989 (1977). For an excellent up-to-date review, see M. Goldhaber, invited talk at Ben Lee Memorial Conference (Oct., 1977), To appear in the Proceedings.Google Scholar
  100. 99.
    See a recent estimate by A. J. Buras, J. Ellis, M. K. Gaillard and D. V. Nanopoulos, Preprint CERN TH 2403 (1977).Google Scholar
  101. 100.
    For an up-to-date review on the tests of unconfined color, see a recent paper by J. C. Pati and Abdus Salam,“Design of Future Experiments: I-To Distinguish Between the Alternatives of Physical and Hidden Color; II-To Test if the Neutral Gauge Boson lies in the vicinity of PETRA-PEP-Region” Trieste Preprint IC/77/65. See also Ref. 46.Google Scholar
  102. 101.
    J. C. Pati, J. Sucher and C. H. Woo, Phys. Rev. D15, 147 (1977).Google Scholar
  103. 102.
    S. Sakakibara, B. Kayser, J. C. Pati and G. Zorn (unpublished).Google Scholar
  104. 103.
    This takes into account the photon-gluon-cancellation-effect in lepto-production of color (Ref. 45).Google Scholar
  105. 104.
    See the third paper in Ref. 45 for a derivation of RColor = (1/8) (m2 U2)2, with mU denoting the gluon-propagator-mass and μ the effective mass of the gluon-partons (μ S mN).Google Scholar
  106. 105.
    Recent PLUTO-data, reported at Photon-Lepton Symposium, held at Hamburg, W. Germany (August, 1977).Google Scholar
  107. 106.
    T. Appelquist and J. Carrazone, Phys. Rev. D11, 2856 (1975).Google Scholar
  108. 107.
    Ref. 58 for other cases (e.g. M° mW-100 GeV).Google Scholar
  109. 108.
    For recent attempts in this direction see F. Wilczek and A. Zee (Preprint, Princeton University, 1977), H. Fritzsch, CERN preprint TH2358 (1977) and S. Weinberg, Harvard Preprint (1977).Google Scholar
  110. 109.
    S. Coleman and E. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D7, 1888 (1973); E. Gildener, Phys. Rev. D14, 1667 (1976). For a suggestion in the recent context, see H. S. Mani, J. C. Pati and Abdus Salam, Trieste Preprint IC/77/80 and Ref. 58.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jogesh C. Pati
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Physics and Astronomyversity of MarylandCollege Park

Personalised recommendations