Magnetic monopoles and related objects

  • Peter Goddard
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 77)


Gauge Theory Gauge Transformation Bianchi Identity Homotopy Class Magnetic Charge 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    G. 't Hooft, Nuclear Physics B79, 276 (1974).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    A. M.Polyakov, JETP letters 20, 194 (1974).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. Coleman, Phys. Rev. D11, 2088 (1975).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. A. M. Dirac, Proc. Roy. Soc. A133, 60 (1931).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Coleman ‘Classical lumps and their quantum descendants’ to be published in the proceedings of the 1975 International School of Subnuclear Physics ‘Ettore 11ajorana'.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    P. Goddard and D. 1. Olive, in preparation; to be submitted in Reports of Progress in Physics.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    A. C. Scott, F. Y. F. Chu and D. W. HcLaughlin, Proc. IEEE 61, 1443 (1973).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    T. H. R. Skyrme, Proc. Roy. Soc. A247, 260 (1958); Proc. Roy. Soc. A262, 237 (1961).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Frohlich, Phys. Rev. Letters 34, 833 (1975).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    G. H. Derrick, J. Hath. Phys. 5, 1252 (1964).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    P. A. M. Dirac, Phys. Rev. 74, 817 (1948).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    E. Amaddi and 11. Cabibbo, ‘On the Dirac Hagnetic Poles’ in ‘Aspects of Quantum Theory’ edited by Abdus Salam and E. P. Wigner (Cambridge, 1972), 183.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    B. Zumino, ‘Recent developments in the theory of uiagnetically charged particles’ in the proceedings of the 1966 International School of Subnuclear Physics ‘Ettore Majorana'.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Y. Aharonov and D. Bohm, Phys. Rev. 115, 489 (1959); Phys. Rev. 123, 1511 (1961).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    D. I. Olive, Nucl. Phys. B113, 413 (1976).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. 138B, 988 (1965).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. Schwinger, Phys. Rev. 144, 1087 (1966).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. K. Prasad and C. M. Sommerfield, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 760 (1975).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    B. Julia and A. Zee, Phys. Rév. D11, 2227 (1975).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    J. C. Taylor, Gauge theories of weak interactions (Cambridge, 1976).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    E. Corrigan, D. I. Olive, D. B. Fairlie and J. Nuyts, Nucl. Phys. B106, 475 (1976).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    E. Corrigan and D. I. Olive Nucl. Phys. B110, 237 (1976).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    E. B. Bogomolny, Soviet J. Nucl. Phys. 24, 801 (1976).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    L. D. Faddeev, Letters Math. Phys. 1, 289 (1976).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    S. Coleman, S. Parke, A. Neveu and C. M. Sommerfield, Phys. Rev. D15, 544 (1977).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    D. G. Boulware, R. N. Cahn, S. D. Ellis and C. Lee, Phys. Rev. D14, 2708 (1976).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    P. Goddard, J. Nuyts and D. I. Olive, CERN preprint TH 2255 (1976), to be published in Nuclear Physics B.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Goddard
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical PhysicsUniversity of CambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations