The calculation of aerodynamic characteristics of wing-body combinations at subsonic flight speeds

  • W. Loeve
Half-hour Lectures
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 59)


Source Distribution Subsonic Flow Transonic Flow Panel Method Forward Shock 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    J.W. Boerstoel and G.H. Huizing, Transonic shock-free aerofoil design by an analytic hodograph method. AJAA paper 74–539 (1974).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    F.Bauer, P. Garabedian and D. Korn, Supercritical Wing Sections. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Vol 66 Springer Verlag (1972).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Eberle, An exact hodograph-method for the design of supercritical wing sections. Symposium Transsonicum II, Springer Verlag (1976).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    P.E. Rubbert and C.R. Saaris, A general three-dimensional potential flow method applied to V/STOL aerodynamics. SAE paper 680304 (1968).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    W. Loeve and J.W. Slooff, On the use of panel methods for predicting subsonic flow about aerofoils and aircraft configurations. NLR MP71018 (1971).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. Nijhuis, A program for the prediction of stationary subsonic flow about airplane configurations.a user's guide for the NLR panel method (with listing of program). NLR TR75052 (1975)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    W. Kraus and P. Sacher, Das Panelverfahren zur Berechnung der Druckverteilung von Flugkorpern, in,Unterschallbereich. Zfw, Heft 9 (1973).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    W. Kraus, Ein allgemeines Panelverfahren zur Berechnung der drei-dimensionalen Potentialströmung um beliebige Flügel Rumpf-Leitwerkskombinationen im Unter-und Uberschall (Anhang: Programmliste, MBB methode III) MBB UFE-1136 (1974).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J.L. Hess, Calculation of potential flow about arbitrary three-dimensional lifting bodies, Final Technical Report, MDC J 5679-01, Mc Donnell Douglas (1972).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R.C. Lock, Methods for elliptic problems in external aerodynamics. RAE Tech Memo Aero 1625 (1975)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    A. Roberts and Kathleen Rundle, The computation of first order compressible flow about wing-body combinations. BAC Rep Aero M A20 (1973).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    F.T. Johnston and P.E. Rubbert, Advanced panel type influence coefficient methods applied to subsonic flow. AJAA paper 75-50 (1975)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    J.L. Hess, Conslistent velocity and potential expansions for higher order surface singularity methods. DAC Rep No MDC J 6911 (1975).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    G.N. van der Plaats, R.M. Hicks and E.N. Murman, Application of numerical optimization techniques to airfoil design. NASA SP-347 part II (1975).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. van der Vooren, J.W. Slooff, G.H. Huizing and A. van Essen, Remarks on the suitability of various transonic small perturbation equations to describe three-dimensional transonic flow; examples of computations using a fully-conservative rotated difference scheme. Symposium Transsonicum II, Springer Verlag (1976).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    W. Loeve, Appraisal of wing aerodynamic design methods for subsonic flight speed, AGARD Lecture Series No 67 (1974).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Loeve
    • 1
  1. 1.National Aerospace Laboratory NLRAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations