Advertisement

Charmed particles and other observable consequences from gauge theories

  • D. V. Nanopoulos
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 56)

Keywords

Gauge Theory Mass Difference Neutral Current Semileptonic Decay Strange Particle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.a
    G.t' Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B33 (1971) 173; ibid B35 (1971) 167. For a recent review on gauge theories seeGoogle Scholar
  2. 1.b
    J. Iliopoulos — Proceedings of the XVIIth International Conference on High Energy Physics, London 1974, edited by J.R. Smith, p. III-89 (S.R.C., Rutherford Laboratory, 1974)Google Scholar
  3. 1.c
    B.W. Lee — Invited talk presented at the International Symposium on Lepton-Photon Interactions at High Energies, Stanford 1975, Fermilab-Conf-75/2-THY (1975).Google Scholar
  4. 2.a
    S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19 (1967) 1264Google Scholar
  5. 2.b
    A. Salam in “Elementary Particle Physics”, edited by N. Svartholm, Stockholm 1968, p. 367.Google Scholar
  6. 3.a
    C.H. Lewellyn-Smith, Phys. Lett. B46 (1973) 233Google Scholar
  7. 3.b
    J.M. Cornwall, D.N. Levin and G. Tiktopoulos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30 (1973) 1268.Google Scholar
  8. 4.a
    F. Englert and R. Brout, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13 (1964) 231Google Scholar
  9. 4.b
    P.W. Higgs, Phys. Lett. 12 (1964) 132, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13 (1964) 508, Phys. Rev. 145 (1966) 1156Google Scholar
  10. 4.c
    G.S. Guralnik, C.R. Hagen and T.W.B. Kibble, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13 (1964) 585Google Scholar
  11. 4.d
    T.W.B. Kibble, Phys. Rev. 155 (1967) 1554Google Scholar
  12. 4.e
    the phenomenon was known in non-relativistic physics, see for ex. P.W. Anderson, Phys. Rev. 112 (1958) 1900.Google Scholar
  13. 5.
    J. Ellis, M.K. Gaillard and D.V. Nanopoulos, “A Phenomenological Profile of the Higgs Boson”, CERN-TH-2093 (November 1975); for a systematic analysis of the properties and experimental consequences of the Higgs scalars.Google Scholar
  14. 6.
    For the experimental status of neutrino interactions we refer to J. Von Krogh, “Neutrino Interactions — Experimental Results” (these proceedings); for the theoretical status of neutral currents we refer to J.J. Sakurai, “Neutral Currents Without Gauge Prejudices” (these proceedings).Google Scholar
  15. 7.a
    Y. Hara, Phys. Rev. B134 (1964) 701Google Scholar
  16. 7.b
    D. Amati, H. Bacry, J. Nuyts and J. Prentki, Phys. Lett. 11 (1964) 190Google Scholar
  17. 7.c
    J.D. Bjorken and S.L. Glashow, Phys. Lett. 11 (1964) 255Google Scholar
  18. 7.d
    Z. Maki and Y. Ohnuki, Progress of theor. Physics (Kyoto) 32 (1964) 144.Google Scholar
  19. 8.
    S.L. Glashow, J. Iliopoulos and L. Maiani, Phys. Rev. D2 (1970) 1285.Google Scholar
  20. 9.a
    S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett 31 (1973) 494Google Scholar
  21. 9.b
    D.V. Nanopoulos, Nuov. Cim. Lett. 8 (1973) 873.Google Scholar
  22. 10.
    W. Bardeen, H. Fritsch and M. Gell-Mann, CERN preprint, CERN-TH 1538 (1972).Google Scholar
  23. 11.a
    M.Y. Han and Y. Nambu, Phys. Rev. B139 (1965) 1006Google Scholar
  24. 11.b
    Y. Nambu and M.Y. Han, Phys. Rev. D10 (1974) 674.Google Scholar
  25. 12.
    C. Bouchiat, J. Iliopoulos and Ph. Meyer, Phys. Lett. 38B (1972) 519.Google Scholar
  26. 13.a
    G. 't Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B61 (1973) 455, B62 (1973) 444Google Scholar
  27. 13.b
    H.D. Politzer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30 (1973) 1346Google Scholar
  28. 13.c
    D.J. Gross and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30 (1973) 1343; for applications of asymptotic freedom to electroproduction and neutrino production seeGoogle Scholar
  29. 13.d
    D.J. Gross and F. Wilczek, Phys. Rev. D8 (1973) 3633, D9 (1974) 980Google Scholar
  30. 13.e
    H. Georgi and H.D. Politzer, Phys. Rev. D9 (1974) 416Google Scholar
  31. 13.f
    D. Bailin, A. Love and D.V. Nanopoulos, Nuov. Cim. Lett. 9 (1974) 501.Google Scholar
  32. 14.a
    S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 29 (1972) 388, 29 (1972) 1698Google Scholar
  33. 14.b
    H. Georgi and S.L. Glashow, Phys. Rev. D6 (1973) 2977, D7 (1973) 2457Google Scholar
  34. 14.c
    H. Georgi and A. Pais, Phys. Rev. D10 (1974) 539; for an excellent review seeGoogle Scholar
  35. 14.d
    S. Weinberg, Rev. of Mod. Phys. Vol. 46 (1974) 255.Google Scholar
  36. 15.
    D.V. Nanopoulos and G.G. Ross, Phys.Lett. 59B, 475 (1975)Google Scholar
  37. 16.
    For the experimental status of e+e annihilation and new particles see G. Wolf, “Recent Experimental Results on e+e Annihilation with Emphasis on the New Particles” (these proceedings).Google Scholar
  38. 17.
    C.G. Callan and D.J. Gross, Phys. Rev. D8 (1973) 4383.Google Scholar
  39. 18.
    S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D8 (1973) 605, ibid D8 (1973) 4482.Google Scholar
  40. 19.a
    M.T. Grisaru, H.J. Schnitzer and H.S. Tsao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30 (1973) 811, Phys. Rev. D8 (1973) 4498; also seeGoogle Scholar
  41. 19.b
    S.Y. Lee, J.M. Rawls and D.Y. Wong, “Reggeization as Spin I Particles in General Lagrangian Models” to be published; for a possible connections of Yang-Mills'field theories with dual models seeGoogle Scholar
  42. 19.c
    A. Neveu and J. Scherk, Nucl. Phys. B36 (1972) 155Google Scholar
  43. 19.d
    J.L. Gervais and A. Neveu, Nucl. Phys. B46 (1972) 381; see alsoGoogle Scholar
  44. 19.e
    J. Scherk, Nucl. Phys. B31 (1971) 222.Google Scholar
  45. 20.a
    H. Lipkin, Phys. Lett. B45 (1973) 267Google Scholar
  46. 20.b
    H. Fritzsch, M. Gell-Mann and H. Leutwyler, Phys. Lett. B47 (1975) 365.Google Scholar
  47. 21.a
    M.K. Gaillard and B.W. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33 (1974) 108Google Scholar
  48. 21.b
    G. Altareli and L. Maiani, Phys. Lett. B52 (1974) 351.Google Scholar
  49. 22.
    For a detailed analysis of applications of the “Standard Model” to the new particles see A. De Rujula, “Asymptotic Freedom. The Discreet Charm of the New Particles” (these proceedings).Google Scholar
  50. 23.a
    J.C. Pati and A. Salam, Phys. Rev. D8 (1973) 1240Google Scholar
  51. 23.b
    H. Georgi and S.L. Glashow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32 (1974) 438Google Scholar
  52. 23.c
    H. Georgi, H.R. Quinn and S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33 (1974) 451.Google Scholar
  53. 24.a
    G. t' Hooft and M. Veltman, CERN preprint, CERN-TH-1723 (1973)Google Scholar
  54. 24.b
    S. Deser, H.S. Tsao and P. van Nieuwenhuizen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 32 (1974) 245, Phys. Rev. D10 (1974) 3337, Phys. Lett. B50 (1974) 491 etc.Google Scholar
  55. 25.a
    M.K. Gaillard and B.W. Lee, Phys. Rev. D10 (1974) 897; see alsoGoogle Scholar
  56. 25.b
    A.I. Vainshtein and I.B. Khriplovich, JETP Letters 18 (1973) 141Google Scholar
  57. 25.c
    V.V. Flambaum, Novosibirsk Institute of Nucl. Phys. Prepr. (1975).Google Scholar
  58. 26.
    A. De Rujula, H. Georgi and S.L. Glashow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35 (1975) 69, “Vector Model of the Weak Interactions”, Harvard preprint.Google Scholar
  59. 27.
    D.V. Nanopoulos and G.G. Ross, Phys. Lett. B56 (1975) 279.Google Scholar
  60. 28.a
    E.B. Bogomolny, V.A. Novikov and M.A. Shifman, Moscow Preprint ITEP-42 (1975)Google Scholar
  61. 28.b
    A.I. Vainshtein, V.I. Zakharov, V.A. Novikov and M.A. Shifman, Moscow Preprint ITEP-44 (1975).Google Scholar
  62. 29.
    M.K. Gaillard, B.W. Lee and R.E. Schrock, CERN-TH 2066, Fermilab Pub 75/68-THY preprint.Google Scholar
  63. 30.
    M.K. Gaillard, B.W. Lee and J.L. Rosner, Rev. of Mod. Physics Vol. 47, (1975) 277.Google Scholar
  64. 31.
    J. Ellis, Acta Physica Austriaca Supp. XIV, p. 143 (1975).Google Scholar
  65. 32.a
    G. Altareli, N. Cabibbo and L. Maiani, Nucl. Phys. B88 (1975) 285, Phys. Lett. B57 (1975) 277Google Scholar
  66. 32.b
    R.L. Kingsley, S.B. Treiman, F. Wilczek and A. Zee, Phys. Rev. D11 (1975) 1919, Phys. Rev. D12 (1975) 106Google Scholar
  67. 32.c
    A. Pais and V. Rittenberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34 (1975) 707Google Scholar
  68. 32.d
    M.B. Einhorn and C. Quigg, Fermilab-Pub-75-21/THY to be publishedGoogle Scholar
  69. 32.e
    Y. Iwasaki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34 (1975) 1407.Google Scholar
  70. 33.
    For a quick comprehencive review on group theory including SU(4) see M.B. Einhorn, Fermilab-Lecture-75/1-THY/EXP. (February 1975).Google Scholar
  71. 34.
    G. Altareli et al., Y. Iwasaki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34 (1975) 1407.Google Scholar
  72. 35.
    J. Ellis, Mary K. Gaillard, D.V. Nanopoulos, Nucl. Phys. B100, 313 (1975)Google Scholar
  73. 36.
    K. Wilson, Phys. Rev. 179 (1969) 1499.Google Scholar
  74. 37.a
    M.K. Gaillard and B.W. Lee, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33 (1974) 108Google Scholar
  75. 37.b
    G. Altarelli and L. Maiani, Phys. Lett. 52 (1974) 351.Google Scholar
  76. 38.
    S. Nussinov and J. Rosner, Phys. Rev. Lett. 23 (1969) 1266.Google Scholar
  77. 39.
    J.C. Pati and C.H. Woo, Phys. Rev. D3 (1971)2920, and references therein.Google Scholar
  78. 40.a
    M.L. Perl et al., SLAC-PUB-1626 (1975)(LBL-4220)Google Scholar
  79. 40.b
    M.L. Perl, SLAC-PUB-1592 (1975) (T/E)Google Scholar
  80. 41.
    A.M. Boyarski et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 35 (1975) 195.Google Scholar
  81. 42.a
    T. Appelquist and H. Georgi, Phys. Rev. D8 (1973) 4000Google Scholar
  82. 42.b
    A. Zee, Phys. Rev. D8 (1973) 4038.Google Scholar
  83. 43.
    M.B. Einhorn and C. Quigg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35 (1975) 1114.Google Scholar
  84. 44.
    D.C. Cundy, Proceedings XVIIth International Conference on High Energy Physics, London 1974 (Rutherford Laboratory, U.K. 1974) p IV, 131.Google Scholar
  85. 45.
    D. Perkins, Rapporteur talk at the International Symposium on Lepton and Photon Interactions, Stanford 1975, Oxford University preprint (1975).Google Scholar
  86. 46.
    V. Barger, T. Weiler and R.J.N. Phillips, Wisconsin preprint (1975).Google Scholar
  87. 47.
    See for example the talks of B.C. Barish and C. Rubbia at the International Symposium on Lepton and Photon Interactions, Stanford (1975).Google Scholar
  88. 48.a
    A. Pais and S.B. Treiman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 1206 (1975) for a clear view of the dimuon events seeGoogle Scholar
  89. 48.b
    B.W. Lee, FERMILAB-CON-75/78 TH.Google Scholar
  90. 49.
    E.G. Cazzoli et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 34 (1975) 1125.Google Scholar
  91. 50.
    H. Deden et al., Phys. Lett. B58 (1975) 361.Google Scholar
  92. 51.
    M.K. Gaillard, S.A. Jackson and D.V. Nanopoulos, CERN-preprint TH-2049, Nucl. Phys. B102, 326 (1975)Google Scholar
  93. 52.a
    D.J. Fox et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 33 (1974) 1504Google Scholar
  94. 52.b
    K.W. Chen, talk given at the FERMILAB Muon Physics Workshop, January 1975Google Scholar
  95. 52.c
    K. Gottfried et al., proposal P-382 to the FERMILAB P.A.C. (1975).Google Scholar
  96. 53.
    M. Frisch, Proceedings of the XVIIth International Conference on High Energy Physics, London 1974, p. V–8.Google Scholar
  97. 54.
    For the experimental status of production of new particles in hadronic reactions see S.C.C. Ting, “Production of J Particles in Hadron Interactions” (these proceedings).Google Scholar
  98. 55.
    As Ref. 53, p. V–41.Google Scholar
  99. 56.
    M. Bourquin and J.M. Gaillard, Phys.Lett. 58B, 191 (1975).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. V. Nanopoulos
    • 1
  1. 1.CERNGeneva

Personalised recommendations