Status of broken color symmetry

  • Berthold Stech
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 56)


Decay Width Color Model Narrow Resonance Color Singlet Color Threshold 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References and footnotes

  1. 1).
    J.J. Aubert et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 1404 (1974)Google Scholar
  2. 2).
    J.E. Augustin et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 1400 (1974) G.S. Abrams et al., Phys. Rev. Lett 33, 1453 (1974)Google Scholar
  3. 3).
    B.H. Wiik, DORIS results presented at the Lepton Photon Symposim, Stanford, 1975 W. Braunschweig et al., Phys. Lett. 57B (1975) 407 J. Heintze, results from the DESY-Heidelberg-Collaboration, Desy-report 75/34Google Scholar
  4. 4).
    G.J. Feldman: SLAC report, presented at the Lepton Photon Symposium, Stanford, 1975Google Scholar
  5. 5).
    Color symmetry as an observable degree of freedom in strong interactions has been used under different names by several authors, notablyGoogle Scholar
  6. 5a).
    M.Y. Han and Y. Nambu, Phys. Rev. 139, B 1006 (1965)Google Scholar
  7. 5b).
    Y. Nambu and M.Y. Han, Phys. Rev. D10, 674 (1974)Google Scholar
  8. 5c).
    A.N. Tavkhelidze et al., IAEA, ICTP Trieste, p. 763 (1965)Google Scholar
  9. 5d).
    After the discovery of the new particles several color models have been proposed. Review papers areGoogle Scholar
  10. 5e).
    O.W. Greenberg, Proceedings of the Orbis Scientiae at the University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, January 1976Google Scholar
  11. 5f).
    D. Schildknecht, DESY 75/13; Invited talk presented at the Xth Rencontre de Moriond, March, 1975Google Scholar
  12. 5g).
    F.E. Close, Ref. Th 2041 — CERN, July, 1975Google Scholar
  13. 5h).
    Lectures at the XVth Cracow School 0f Physics, Zakopane, Poland, June 1975Google Scholar
  14. 5i).
    R.D. Peccei, Stanford ITP-501, 7/75. Invited talk given at the Argonne Summer Symposium on New Directions in Hadron Spectroscopy, July 1975Google Scholar
  15. 6).
    B.Stech, Heidelberg preprints HD-THEP 74,75-3,75-6; Invited talk, Proceedings 0f the XII. International Winterschool, Karpacz, Poland, February 1975Google Scholar
  16. 7).
    N. Marinescu and B. Stech, HD-THEP-75-4, 75-7, Phys. Rev. D12, 1356 (1975)Google Scholar
  17. 8).
    Symmetry breaking terms and particle assignments similar to the ones used in Refs. 6,7) have been proposed independently byGoogle Scholar
  18. 8a).
    W. Alles, Lett. al Nuovo Cim. 12, N. 8, p.280 (1975)Google Scholar
  19. 8b).
    G. Feldman and P.T. Matthews, Imperial College Report 74/75Google Scholar
  20. 8c).
    P.T. Matthews, report given at the Palermo Conference 1975Google Scholar
  21. 8d).
    B.G. Kenny, D.C. Peaslee and L.J. Tassie, Phys. Rev. Letters 34, 1482 (1975)Google Scholar
  22. 9).
    W. Alles, Lett. Nuovo Cimento 12, 185 (1975)Google Scholar
  23. 9a).
    M. Krammer, D. Schildknecht, and F. Steiner, Phys. Rev. D12, 139 (1975)Google Scholar
  24. 9b).
    S. Kitakado and T.F. Walsh, DESY 74/64Google Scholar
  25. 9c).
    I. Bars and R.D. Peccei, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 985 (1975)Google Scholar
  26. 9d).
    S.B. Gerasimov and A.B. Govorkov, Dubna E2-8656 (1975)Google Scholar
  27. 10).
    This notation is slightly different from the one used in Refs. 6,7)Google Scholar
  28. 11).
    R. Schwitters, SLAC report, presented at the Lepton Photon Symposium, Stanford, 1975Google Scholar
  29. 12).
    A.M. Boyarski et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 1357 (1975)Google Scholar
  30. 13).
    Eq. (13) differs by a factor 2/3 from the formula given in Refs. 6,7) due to the fact that only the width to usual hadrons is estimated.Google Scholar
  31. 14).
    It is not clear why the 4.1 GeV resonance is wider than the others. Perhaps, the high energy tail of this resonance decays preferentially to the ψ(3.95?) by π-emission.Google Scholar
  32. 15).
    V. Lüth, Invited lecture given at the Palermo Conference, June 1975, and SLAC-PUB-1599 (1975)Google Scholar
  33. 16).
    The ψ itself has G-parity +1 and I = 1 if the isospin operators are taken from the diagonal subgroup of SU3′ xSU3″.Google Scholar
  34. 17).
    S.Okubo, Phys. Lett. 5, 165 (1963)Google Scholar
  35. 17a).
    G. Zweig, CERN-TH 401 and TH-412 (1964)Google Scholar
  36. 17c).
    J. Iizuka, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. 37–38. 21 (1966)Google Scholar
  37. 18).
    F. Gilman, SLAC-PUB-1600 (1975)Google Scholar
  38. 19).
    G. Abrams, SLAC report presented at the Lepton Photon Symposium, Stanford 1975Google Scholar
  39. 20).
    CERN ψ-notes, Ref.TH 2964-CERNGoogle Scholar
  40. 20a).
    H. Harari, ψ-chology notes, SLAC-PUB-1514Google Scholar
  41. 21).
    O.W. Greenberg, loc. cit. ref. 5)Google Scholar
  42. 21a).
    M. Kuroda and Y. Yamagouchi, report UT-248 (1975) See also Refs. 6,7)Google Scholar
  43. 22).
    M.G. Schmidt and B. Stech, Nucl. Phys. B52, 445 (1973)Google Scholar
  44. 23).
    A mass dependence of particle radii is suggested by the mass independence of the leptonic widths.Google Scholar
  45. 24).
    B. Wiik, loc. cit. ref. 3).Google Scholar
  46. 25).
    J. Heintze, loc. cit. ref. 3).Google Scholar
  47. 26).
    I. Bars and R.D. Peccei, loc. cit. ref. 9).Google Scholar
  48. 27).
    J. Ellis; Invited talk presented at the Weekend Meeting on Deep Inelastic Phenomena, Rutherford Lab., 1974 Ref. TH. 1880-CERNGoogle Scholar
  49. 28).
    H.C. Llewellyn-Smith; Invited talk, Lepton Photon Symposium, Stanford, 1975Google Scholar
  50. 29).
    S.L. Glashow, J. Iliopoulos and L. Maiani, Phys. Rev. D2, 1285 (1970)Google Scholar
  51. 30).
    B. Aubert et al., Proceedings of the London Conference on High Energy Physics, 1974Google Scholar
  52. 30a).
    A. Benvenuti et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 419 (1975)Google Scholar
  53. 30b).
    See also the reports given by B.C. Barish and C. Rubbia in Stanford (1975)Google Scholar
  54. 31).
    B. Stech, Phys. Lett. 49B, 471 (1975)Google Scholar
  55. 32).
    A somewhat different leptonic current is used by T.C. Yang, Maryland report 76–o25, July, 1975Google Scholar
  56. 33).
    G.J. Feldman and M.L. Perl, loc. cit. ref. 4).Google Scholar
  57. 34).
    B. Stech, Nucl. Phys. B64, 194 (1973).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1976

Authors and Affiliations

  • Berthold Stech
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für theoretische Physikder Universität HeidelbergHeidelberg

Personalised recommendations