Advertisement

Computation of the reaction matrix, G

  • Richard L. Becker
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 40)

Keywords

Nuclear Matter Hard Core Pair State Pauli Operator Tensor Force 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    K. A. Brueckner, Phys. Rev. 97, 1353 (1955).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    R. L. Becker, Phys. Rev. 127, 1328 (1962) App. C.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    H. A. Bethe, B. H. Brandow, and A. G. Petschek, Phys. Rev. 129, 225 (1963).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    B. H. Brandow, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 57, 214 (1970); Phys. Rev. 152, 863 (1966).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. A. Moszkowski and B. L. Scott, Ann. Phys. 11, 65 (1960); Scott and Moszkowski, ibid. 14, 107 (1961); Nucl. Phys. 29, 665 (1962); S. Köhler, Ann. Phys. 16, 375 (1961).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    W. Tobocman, Phys. Rev. 107, 203 (1957).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. F. Tsai and T. T. S. Kuo, Phys. Lett. 39B, 427 (1972).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    See M. H. MacFarlane, in Proc. Int. School of Physics, “Enrico Fermi”, Course 40. Varenna, 1967 (Academic Press, New York, 1968): B. H. Brandow, Revs, Mod, Phys. 39, 771 (1967)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. W. Negele and D. Vautherin, Phys. Rev. C5, 1472 (1972); ibid. Cll, 1031 (1975).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    K. A. Brueckner, J. L. Gammel, and H. Weitzner, Phys. Rev. 110, 431 (1958).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    See V. J. Emery, Nucl. Phys. 12, 69 (1959).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    K. A. Brueckner, Phys. Rev. 100, 36 (1955); J. Goldstone, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A293, 267 (1957).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. J. Thouless, Phys. Rev. 112, 906 (1958)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    14.R. W. Jones, F. Mohling, and R. L. Becker, Nucl. Phys. A220, 45 (1974).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    R. Mercier, E. U. Baranger, and R. J. McCarthy, Nucl. Phys. A130, 322 (1969); R. L. Becker, et al., Oak Ridge Nat. Lab. Report ORNL-4395 (1968) p. 116.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    B. R. Barrett, R. G. L. Hewitt, and R. J. McCarthy, Phys. Rev. C3, 1137 (1971). 17. H. A. Bethe and J. Goldstone, Proc. Roy. Soc. A238, 551 (1957).Google Scholar
  17. 18.
    L. C. Gomes, J. D. Walecka, and V. F. Weisskopf, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 3, 241 (1958).Google Scholar
  18. 19.
    R. K. Bhaduri and M. A. Preston, Can. J. Phys. 42, 696 (1964); C. W. Wong, Nucl. Phys. 56, 213 (1964).Google Scholar
  19. 20.
    K. A. Brueckner and J. L. Gammel, Phys. Rev. 109, 1023 (1958).Google Scholar
  20. 21.
    K. A. Brueckner and W. Wada, Phys. Rev. 103, 1008 (1956).Google Scholar
  21. 22.
    E. J. Irwin, Thesis, Cornell Univ., 1963; G. E. Brown, G. T. Schappert, and C. W. Wong, Nucl. Phys. 56, 191 (1964).Google Scholar
  22. 23.
    G. Dahll, E. Ostgaard, and B. Brandow, Nucl. Phys. A124, 481 (1969).Google Scholar
  23. 24.
    See, e.g. G. G. Hall, “Matrices and Tensors” (MacMillan, New York, 1963) p. 32.Google Scholar
  24. 25.
    M. L. Goldberger, Phys. Rev. 84, 929 (1951).Google Scholar
  25. 26.
    R. J. McCarthy and K. T. R. Ravies, Phys. Rev. Cl, 1644 (1970).Google Scholar
  26. 27.
    R. J. Eden and V. J. Emery, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A248, 266 (1958); Eden, Emery, and S. Sampanthar, ibid. A253, 177, 186 (1959)Google Scholar
  27. 28.
    T. T. S. Kuo and G. E. Brown, Nucl. Phys. 85, 40 (1966).Google Scholar
  28. 29.
    T. T. S. Kuo, Nucl. Phys. 103, 71 (1967).Google Scholar
  29. 30.
    R. E. Peierls, in Lectures in Theor. Phys., s., Vol. 1 (Boulder, 1958) ed. by W. Briton and L. Dunham, (Interscience, New York, 1959).Google Scholar
  30. 31.
    G. E. Brown, Unified Theory of Nuclear Models and Forces, 3rd ed. (NorthHolland, Amsterdam, 1971).Google Scholar
  31. 32.
    See D. W. L. Sprung and P. K. Banerjee, Nucl. Phys. A168, 273 (1971); P, K. Banerjee and Sprung, Can. J. Phys. 49, 1899 (1971).Google Scholar
  32. 33.
    B. Day, Phys. Rev. 136, B1594 (1964) B. H. Brandow, Thesis, Cornell Univ., 1964; C. W. Wong, Thesis, Harvard Univ., 1965.Google Scholar
  33. 34.
    C. W. Wong, Nucl. Phys. A91, 399 (1967).Google Scholar
  34. 35.
    I. Talmi, Helv. Phys. Acta 25, 185 (1952).Google Scholar
  35. 36.
    M. Moshinsky, Nucl. Phys. 13, 104 (1959); T. A. Brody and M. Moshinsky, Tables of Transformation Brackets for Nuclear Shell Model Calculations Monografis el Instituto di Fisica, 1960); M. Baranger an K. T. R. Davies, Nucl. Phys. 79, 403 (1966); D. H. Feng and T. Tamura, “Calculations of Harmonic Oscillator Brackets”, preprint, Univ. of Texas, May 1975.Google Scholar
  36. 37.
    A. D. MacKellar and R. L. Becker, Phys. Lett. 18, 308 (1965); A. D. MacKellar, Thesis, Texas A & M, Oak Ridge Nat. Lab. Report ORNL-TM-1374 (1966); Becker and MacKellar, Phys. Lett. 21, 201 (1966).Google Scholar
  37. 38.
    R. L. Becker, A. D. MacKellar, and B. M. Morris, Phys. Rev. 174, 1264 (1968).Google Scholar
  38. 39.
    R. L. Becker, unpublished; employed by Becker, Phys. Rev. Lett. 24, 400 (1970) and by Becker, Morris, and Patterson (to be published).Google Scholar
  39. 40.
    M. Baranger, in Proc. Int. School of Physics “Enrico Fermi”, Course 40, Varenna, 1967 (AcademicPress, New York, 1968).Google Scholar
  40. 41.
    M. M. Stingl and M. W. Kirson, Nucl. Phys. A137, 289 (1969).Google Scholar
  41. 42.
    H. S. Köhler and R. J. McCarthy, Nucl. Phys. 86, 611 (1966); McCarthy and Köhler, ibid. A99, 65 (1967).Google Scholar
  42. 43.
    H. S. Köhler and R. J. McCarthy, Nucl. Phys. A106, 313 (1968); McCarthy, ibid. A130, 305 (1969).Google Scholar
  43. 44.
    A. Kallio and B. D. Day, Nucl. Phys. A124, 177 (1969).Google Scholar
  44. 45.
    P. U. Sauer, Nucl. Phys. A150, 467 (1970).Google Scholar
  45. 46.
    R. L. Becker and A. D. MacKellar, “Test of Day's Approximation of the Defect Function”, to be published.Google Scholar
  46. 47.
    P. J. Siemens, Nucl. Phys. A141, 225 (1970).Google Scholar
  47. 48.
    S. J. Butler, R. G. L. Hewitt, B. H. J. McKellar, I. R. Nicholls, and J. S. Truelove, Phys. Rev. 186, 963 (1969); J. S. Truelove and I. R. Nicholls, Australian J. Phys. 23, 231 (1970).Google Scholar
  48. 49.
    B. P. Nigam, Phys. Rev. 133, B1381 (1964); Y. E. Kim, Phys. Lett. 19, 583 (1965).Google Scholar
  49. 50.
    R. L. Becker, K. T. R. Davies, and M. R. Patterson, Phys. Rev. C9, 1221 (1974).Google Scholar
  50. 51.
    R. K. Tripathi, A. Faessler, and A. D. MacKellar, Phys. Rev. C8, 129 (1973); Faessler, MacKellar, and Tripathi, Nucl. Phys. A215, 525 (197.Google Scholar
  51. 52.
    R. K. Tripathi, A. Faessler, and H. Müther, Phys. Rev. C10, 2080 (1974).Google Scholar
  52. 53.
    R. L. Becker and N. M. Larson, ORNL-5025 (1974) p. 12; 77L. Becker, Bull. Am. Phys. Soc. 20, 554 (1975).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard L. Becker
    • 1
  1. 1.Oak Ridge National LaboratoryTennessee

Personalised recommendations