Evaluation in the computing center environment
There has in recent years been much concern over software, its bad quality, delays in delivery, cost which exceed the estimates etc.
We may not be able to improve the situation in a drastic way on a short term basis, although the seeking for basic principles in the concept of software engineering does give occasion to more optimism.
The users of software, however, must be aware that they also have a large responsibility for the improvement, and if a larger awareness of this aspect has been obtained through the present paper one of the goals has been obtained.
KeywordsComputer Usage Computing Center Software Advisor Hide Cost Software House
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- P.A. Samet: Measuring the efficiency of software, Proceedings SEAS XIV, Grenoble, France 1969.Google Scholar
- H. J. Helms et al.: Experiences from operating NEUCC (in Danish), Forskning, december 1968.Google Scholar
- E. Hunt, G. Diehr, D. Garnatz: Who are the users? —An analysis of computer use in a university computer center, AFIPS Conference Proceedings Vol. 38, 1971. Spring Joint Computer Conference, 1971.Google Scholar
- D. Knuth: An empirical study of FORTRAN programs, Software Vol. 1, No 2, 1971.Google Scholar
- S.C. Darden and S. B. Heller: Streamline your software development, Computer Decisions No. 2, 1970.Google Scholar
- C. C. Gotlieb: Pricing mechanisms, Advanced Course on Software Engineering, 1972.Google Scholar
- M.D. McIlroy: Mass produced software components, in P. Naur and B. Randell (eds.): Software Engineering, Report on a conference, October 1968.Google Scholar
- H. J. Helms (ed.) Guidance in Construction of Datamatic Systems (in Danish), Studentlitteratur, Lund, 1972Google Scholar
- G. Goos: Documentation, Advanced Course on Software Engineering, 1972.Google Scholar
- A. I. Llewelyn and R. F. Wickens: The testing of computer software, in P. Naur and B. Randell (eds.): Software Engineering, Report on a conference, October 1968.Google Scholar