Optimal resource allocation and scheduling among parallel processes

Session 5: Scheduling II
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 24)


The problem of optimally allocating limited resources among competing processes may be formulated as a problem in finding the shortest path in a directed graph, provided a quantitative measure of the performance of each process as a function of its resource allocation can be suitably defined. If this measure is also a function of time, scheduling problems arise so that optimal allocations become time-varying and may depend upon various precedence relations or constraints among the processes. Dynamic programming approaches to such allocation and scheduling problems are presented in the context of parallel processing.


Short Path Schedule Problem Allocation Problem Processor Utilization Allocation Cost 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    H. Lorin, Parallelism in Hardware and Software: Real and Apparent Concurrency, Prentice-Hall, (1972).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    E.G. Coffman, Jr., and P.J. Denning, Operating Systems Theory, Prentice-Hall, (1973).Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    IBM, "IBM System/360 Operating System Concepts and Facilities," Form. No. GC28-6535.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    A. Lew, "Memory Allocation in Paging Systems," Proc. ACM Annual Conf., (1973), pp. 232–235.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    A. Kaufmann, Graphs, Dynamic Programming, and Finite Games, Academic Press, (1967).Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    D.E. Knuth, Fundamental Algorithms, Addison-Wesley, (1968).Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    J. Kral, "One Way of Estimating Frequencies of Jumps in a Program," Comm. ACM, (1968) pp. 475–480.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    IBM, "IBM System/360 Operating System Linkage Editor and Loader," Form No. C28-6538.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    D.P. Bovet, and G. Estrin, "On Static Memory Allocation in Computer Systems," IEEE Trans. Comp., (1970), pp. 492–503.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    S.E. Dreyfus, "An Appraisal of Some Shortest-path Algorithms," ORSA, (1969), pp. 395–412.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    R.E. Bellman, and S.E. Dreyfus, Applied Dynamic Programming, Princeton U. Press, (1962).Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    M. Held and R.M. Karp, "The Construction of Discrete Dynamic Programming Algorithms," IBM Syst. J., (1965), pp. 136–147.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    P.J. Denning, "The Working Set Model for Program Behavior", Comm. ACM, (1968), pp. 323–333.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    P.J. Denning, "Thrashing: Its Causes and Prevention," Proc. AFIPS FJCC, (1968), pp. 915–922.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    E.G. Coffman, Jr., and T.A. Ryan, Jr., "A Study of Storage Partitioning Using a Mathematical Model of Locality," Comm. ACM, (1972), pp. 185–190.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    G. Ingargiola and J.F. Korsh, "Finding Optimal Demand Paging Algorithms," J. ACM, (1974), pp. 40–53.Google Scholar
  17. [17]
    M.A. Franklin, and R.K. Gupta, "Computation of Page Fault Probability from Program Transition Diagram," Comm. ACM, (1974), pp. 186–191.Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    W.W. Chu, and H. Opderbeck, "The Page Fault Frequency Replacement Algorithm", Proc. AFIPS FJCC, (1972), pp. 597–609.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    S. Even, A. Pnueli, and A. Lempel, "Permutation Graphs and Transitive Graphs," J. ACM, (1972), pp. 400–410.Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    E.W. Dijkstra, "Co-operating Sequential Processes," in Programming Languages (Ed. Genuys), Academic Press, (1968), pp. 43–112.Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    D.P. Gaver, Jr., and P.A.W. Lewis, "Probability Models for Buffer Storage Allocation Problems," J. ACM, (1971), pp. 186–198.Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    H. Hellerman, "Time-sharing Scheduler Strategies," IBM Syst. J., (1969), pp. 94–117.Google Scholar
  23. [23]
    R.W. Conway, W.L. Maxwell, and L.W. Miller, Theory of Scheduling, Addison-Wesley, (1967).Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    R.A. Howard, Dynamic Programming and Markov Processes, MIT Press, (1960).Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    R.L. Mattson, J. Gecsei, D.R. Slutz, and I.L. Traiger, "Evaluation Techniques for Storage Hierarchies," IBM Syst. J., (1970), pp. 78–117.Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    A. Lew, "Comments on ‘Finding Optimal Demand Paging Algorithms'," Dept. of Info. and Comp. Sci., Univ. of Hawaii, TR No. AR0-19, (1974).Google Scholar
  27. [27]
    J.L. Baer, "A Survey of Some Theoretical Aspects of Multiprocessing," ACM Comp. Surv., (1973), pp. 31–80.Google Scholar
  28. [28]
    IBM, "Direct Access Storage Devices and Organization Methods," Form No. C20-1649.Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    P.J. Denning, "Effects of Scheduling on File Memory Operations," Proc. AFIPS SJCC (1967), pp. 9–21.Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    T.J. Teorey, and T.B. Pinkerton, "A Comparative Analysis of Disk Scheduling Policies," Comm. ACM, (1972), pp. 177–184.Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    L.T. Reinwald, and R.M. Soland, "Conversion of Limited-Entry Decision Tables to Optimal Computer Programs I: Minimum Average Processing Time," J. ACM, (1966), pp. 339–358.Google Scholar
  32. [32]
    E.G. Coffman, Jr., M.J. Elphick, and A. Shoshani, "System Deadlocks," ACM Comp. Surv., (1971), pp. 67–78.Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    R.C. Holt, "Some Deadlock Properties of Computer Systems," ACM Comp. Surv. (1972), pp. 179–196.Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    R. Bellman, and R. Kalaba, "On kth Best Policies," J. SIAM, (1960), pp. 582–588.Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    F.S. Hillier, and G.J. Lieberman, Introduction to Operations Research, Holden-Day, (1967).Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    R.G. Hamlet, "Efficient Multiprogramming Resource Allocation and Accounting," Comm. ACM, (1973), pp. 337–343.Google Scholar
  37. [37]
    A. Thesen, "Scheduling of Computer Programs for Optimal Machine Utilization," BIT, (1973), pp. 206–216.Google Scholar
  38. [38]
    R.M. Beeson, and W.S. Meisel, "Optimization of Complex Systems with Respect to Multiple Criteria," Proc. IEEE-SMC Symp., (1971), pp. 144–149.Google Scholar
  39. [39]
    D. Michie, J.G. Fleming, and J.V. Oldfield, "A Comparison of Heuristic, Interactive, and Unaided Methods of Solving a Shortest-route Problem," in Machine Intelligence 3 (Ed. Michie), American Elsevier, (1968), pp. 245–255.Google Scholar
  40. [40]
    A. Lew, "Successive Approximations and Dynamic Programming," Proc. 5th Asilomar Conf. on Circuits and Systems, (1971), pp. 79–82.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1975

Authors and Affiliations

  • Art Lew
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information and Computer SciencesUniversity of HawaiiHonolulu

Personalised recommendations