Advertisement

Die Uebersetzung der CAMAC-Sprache unter Verwendung der Zwischensprache IML — Erfahrungen bei der Implementierung von CAMAC Compilern

  • W. Kneis
  • K. H. Degenhardt
  • W. Woletz
Programmerstellung Und Prozesssprachen
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 12)

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literaturangaben

  1. (01).
    CAMAC Bulletin, 5, Supplement (1972).Google Scholar
  2. (02).
    Lewis, A., Definition of the Camac Intermediate Language. SWG 1/74 (1974), ESONE-SWG, Draft Report.Google Scholar
  3. (03).
    CAMAC: A Modular Instrumentation System for Data Handling. EUR 4100 (1972), Esone Committee, Ispra, Italien.Google Scholar
  4. (04).
    Katz, A., CAMAC, CAMAC2 Macro Implementations. SWG 44/73, 45/73 (1973), ESONE-SWG, Draft Reports.Google Scholar
  5. (05).
    Davies, M. P. H., Hagan, P. J., Implementation on a Multi-User PDP-10/PDP-7 System — A High Level User Language. European Decus Proceedings, Aug. 1973Google Scholar
  6. (06).
    Thomas, R. F., Jr., Specifications for Standard CAMAC-Subroutines. CAMAC Bulletin, 6 (1973).Google Scholar
  7. (07).
    Kneis, W., General Aspects of Translation and Implementation of the CAMAC IML. SWG 13/73 (1973), ESONE-SWG, Draft Report.Google Scholar
  8. (08).
    Kneis, W., Implementation of CAMAC IML in an Assembler Language Environment. (wird verceffentlicht in: CAMAC Bulletin, 10, Juli 1974)Google Scholar
  9. (09).
    CAMAC: Organisation of Multi-Crate Systems. EUR 4600 (1972), ESONE Committee, Ispra, Italien.Google Scholar
  10. (10).
    Hagan, P. J., IML Macro-Expansion Syntax. SWG 2/74 (1974), ESONE-SWG, Draft Report.Google Scholar
  11. (11).
    Feldmann, J. A., A Formal Semantics for Computer Languages and its Application in a Compiler Compiler. Comm. ACM, 9 (1966), p. 3.Google Scholar
  12. (12).
    Evans, A., Jr. An Algol 60 Compiler. Ann. Rev. Automatic Programming 4 (1964), p. 87.Google Scholar
  13. (13).
    Floyd, R. W., A Descriptive Language for Symbol Manipulation. J. ACM. 8, 10 (1961), p. 579.Google Scholar
  14. (14).
    Knuth, D. E., On the Translation of Languages from Left to Right. Inf. Contr. 8 (1965), p. 607.Google Scholar
  15. (15).
    Ichbiah, J. D., Morse, S. P., A Technique for Generating Almost Optimal Floyd-Evans Productions, for Precedence Grammers. Comm. ACM, 13 (1970) p. 501.Google Scholar
  16. (16).
    Schorre, D. V., META II, a syntax-oriented compiler writing language. Proc. of the 19th Natl. ACM Conf., (1964), D1.Google Scholar
  17. (17).
    Kneis, W., META-II/X — Beispiel eines Metacompiler-Systems. (noch zu veroeffentlichen).Google Scholar
  18. (18).
    PEARL — A Proposal for a Process-and Experiment Automation Realtime Language, Ges. fuer Kernforschung, KfK-PDV1, April (1973).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Kneis
    • 1
  • K. H. Degenhardt
    • 2
  • W. Woletz
    • 2
  1. 1.GfK/ZyklotronKarlsruhe
  2. 2.HMIBerlin

Personalised recommendations