Advertisement

Stability and accuracy studies on a second-order method of characteristics scheme for three-dimensional, steady, supersonic flow

  • Victor H. Ransom
  • H. Doyle Thompson
  • Joe D. Hoffman
Session IV Flow Field Calculations
Part of the Lecture Notes in Physics book series (LNP, volume 8)

Abstract

A new explicit method of characteristics (MOC) numerical scheme for three-dimensional steady flow has been developed which has second-order accuracy. A complete numerical algorithm has been developed for computing internal supersonic flows. A comprehensive stability analysis was conducted in which both the Courant-Friedrichs-Lewy (CFL) stability criterion and the von Neumann stability analysis were applied. Although necessary and sufficient criteria for stability exist only for linear difference equations and analytic initial data, experience has indicated that these same criteria are appropriate for nonlinear systems when applied locally to the linearized form of the equations. This thesis is supported by the results of the present research in which the nonlinear scheme was found to be stable only when the analysis of the linearized system indicated stability. The numerical scheme has been tested for order of accuracy using exact solutions for source flow and Prandtl-Meyer flow. The results of these tests have verified the second-order accuracy of the scheme. Additional tests using axisymmetric flows have shown that the accuracy of the scheme is comparable to that of a proven second-order two-dimensional MOC scheme.

Keywords

Mach Number Numerical Scheme Linear Difference Equation Source Flow Hyperbolic Partial Differential Equation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Butler, D. S., Proc. Roy. Soc. A 255, 232 (1960).Google Scholar
  2. Chushkin, P. I., Chap. 3 Progress in Aeronautical Sciences Vol. 9, Ed. by D. Kuchemann, Pergamon Press (1968).Google Scholar
  3. Fowell, L. R., IAS Paper 61-208-1902 (1961).Google Scholar
  4. Heie, H., and Leigh, D. C., Rept. 705, Dept. of Aerospace and Mechanical Sciences, Princeton Univ. (1964).Google Scholar
  5. Heie, H. and Leigh, D. C., AIAA J. 3, 1099 (1965).Google Scholar
  6. Ransom, Victor H., Thompson, H. Doyle, and Hoffman, Joe D., Rept. AFAPL-TR-69-98, Vol. I, Aero Propulsion Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio (1969).Google Scholar
  7. Ransom, V. H., Cline, M. C., Hoffman, J. D., and Thompson, H. D., Rept. AFAPL-TR-6998, Vol. II, Aero Propulsion Laboratory, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio (1970).Google Scholar
  8. Strom, C. R., Dissertation, Univ. of Illinois (1965).Google Scholar
  9. Thompson, H. D., Rept. TM-64-1, Jet Propulsion Center, Purdue University (1965).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1971

Authors and Affiliations

  • Victor H. Ransom
    • 1
  • H. Doyle Thompson
    • 2
  • Joe D. Hoffman
    • 2
  1. 1.Thermal and Fluid Dyn. Sect.Aerojet Liquid Rocket Co.Sacramento
  2. 2.School of Mechanical Eng.Purdue Univ.Lafayette

Personalised recommendations