Advertisement

Damage Modelling at Material Interfaces

  • Marcin Białas
  • Zenon Mróz
Part of the CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences book series (CISM, volume 474)

Abstract

Interface damage and delamination is usually accompanied by frictional slip at contacting interfaces under compressive normal stress. Under tensile stress the separation and opening mode develops. The present study provides a simplified analysis of progressive interface failure under applied in plane tractions and normal compressive traction. The cohesive crack model is used to simulate damage frictional traction present at contact. Both monotonic and cyclic loadings are considered for an elastic plate bonded to a rigid substrate by means of cohesive interface. The analysis of progressive delamination process revealed three solution types, namely short, medium and long plate solutions. For cyclic loading the states of frictional slip accompanied by shake down or incremental failure are distinguished. The finite element solutions confirm the validity of simplified analysis. The thermal loading case is studied separately under monotonic and cyclic temperature loading history. The cracking of plate is now accompanied by frictional slip and progressive delamination of the interface layer. The analysis predicts the cracking pattern and the size of delaminated zones.

Keywords

Plastic Zone Displacement Field Damage Modelling Cohesive Zone Damage Zone 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. D. C. Agrawal and R. Raj. Measurement of the ultimate shear strength of a metal-ceramic interface. Acta metall, 37(4): 1265–1270, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. D. C. Agrawal and R. Raj. Ultimate shear strengths of copper-silica and nickel-silica interfaces. Materials Science and Engineering, A126:125–131, 1990.Google Scholar
  3. S. P. Baker, X. Wang, and C.-Y. Hui. Effect of nonlinear elastic behavior on bilayer decohesion of thin metal films from nonmetal substrate. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 69:407–414, July 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. G. I. Barenblatt. The mathematical theory of equilibrium cracks in brittle fracture. In Advances in Applied Mechanics, volume 7, pages 55–129. Academic Press, New York, 1962.Google Scholar
  5. S. J. Bennison and B. R. Lawn. Role of interfacial crack bridging sliding friction in the crack resistance and strength properties of non-transforming ceramics. Acta Metallurgica, 37(10):2659–2671, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. M. Białas and Z. Mróz. Modelling of progressive interface failure under combined normal compression and shear stress. Submitted to International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2004.Google Scholar
  7. B. F. Chen, J. Hwang, I. F. Chen, G. P. Yu, and J-H. Huang. A tensile-film-cracking model for evaluating interfacial shear strength of elastic film on ductile substrate. Surface and Coatings Technology, 126:91–95, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. S. Chi and Y.-L. Chung. Cracking in coating-substrate composite with multi-layered and fgm coatings. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 70:1227–1243, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Y.-L. Chung and C.-F. Pon. Boundary element analysis of cracked film-substrate media. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 38:75–90, 2001.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. D. S. Dugdale. Yielding of steel sheets containing slits. Journal of Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 8:100–104, 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. B. Erdem Alaca, M. T. A. Saif, and Huseyin Sehitoglu. On the interface debond at the edge of a thin film on a thick substrate. Acta Materialia, 50:1197–1209, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. A. G. Evans and J. W. Hutchinson. Effect of non-planarity on the mixed mode fracture resistance. Ada Metallurgica, 37(3):909–916, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. T. S. Gross and D. A. Mendelsohn. Model I stress intensity factors induced by fracture surface roughness under pure mode III loading: application to the effect of loading models on stress corrosion crack growth. Metallurgical and Material Transactions A, 20(10), 1989.Google Scholar
  14. U. A. Handge, Y. Leterrier, G. Rochat, I. M. Sokolov, and A. Blumen. Two scaling domains in multiple cracking phenomena. Physical Review E, 62(6):7807–7810, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. U. A. Handge, I. M. Sokolov, and A. Blumen. Disorder and plasticity in the fragmentation of coatings. Physical Review E, 64:106–109, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. A. Hillerborg, M. Modeer, and P. E. Peterson. Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements. Cement and Concrete Research, 6:773–782, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. D. R. Hiltunen and R. Roque. A mechanics-based prediction model for thermal cracking of asphaltic concrete pavements. Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 63: 81–117, 1994.Google Scholar
  18. J. W. Hutchinson and Z. Suo. Mixed mode cracking of layered materials. In J. W. Hutchinson and T. Y. Wu, editors, Advances in Applied Mechanics, volume 29, pages 63–191. Academic Press, 1991.Google Scholar
  19. S.-R. Kim and J. A. Nairn. Fracture mechanics analysis of coating/substrate systems. part i: Analysis of tensile and bending experiments. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 65:573–593, 2000a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. S.-R. Kim and J. A. Nairn. Fracture mechanics analysis of coating/substrate systems. part ii: Experiments in bending. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 65:595–607, 2000b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. K. Kokini and Y. R. Takeuchi. Multiple surface thermal fracture of graded ceramic coatings. Journal of Thermal Stresses, 27:715–725, 1998.Google Scholar
  22. Z. Mróz and M. Białas. A simplified analysis of interface failure under compressive normal stress and monotonic or cyclic shear loading. International Journal of Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics. In press, 2004.Google Scholar
  23. Z. Mróz and A. Seweryn. Non local failure and damage evolution rule: application to a dilatant crack model. Journal de Physique IV, 8(Pr 8):257–268, 1998.Google Scholar
  24. Z. Mróz and S. Stupkiewicz. Hysteretic effects and progressive delamination at composite interfaces. In R. Pyrz, editor, IUTAM Symposium on Micro structure-Property Interactions in Composite Materials, pages 247–264. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995.Google Scholar
  25. J. A. Nairn and S.-R. Kim. A fracture mechanics analysis of multiple cracking in coatings. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 42:195–208, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. M. Ortiz. Computational micro-mechanics. Computational Mechanics, 18(5):324–338, 1996.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  27. H. L. Schreyer and A. Peffer. Fiber pullout based on a one-dimensinal model of decohesion. Mechanics of Materials, 32:821–836, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. G. W. Schulze and F. Erdogan. Periodic cracking of elastic coating. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 35(28–29):3615–3634, 1998.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  29. F.-S. Shieu, R. Raj, and S. L. Sass. Control of mechanical properties of metal-ceramic interfaces through interfacial reactions. Acta metall mater., 38(11):2215–2224, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. D. H. Timm, B. B. Guzina, and V. R. Voller. Prediction of thermal crack spacing. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 40:125–142, 2003.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. S. Wolfram. The Mathematica Book (4th ed.). Wolfram Media/Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
  32. Z. C. Xia and J. W. Hutchinson. Crack patterns in thin films. Journal of Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 48:1107–1131, 2000.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. B. Yang and K. Ravi-Chandar. Antiplane shear crack growth under quasistatic loading in a damaging material. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 35(28,29): 3695–3715, 1997.Google Scholar
  34. T.-Y. Zhang and M.-H. Zhao. Equilibrium depth and spacing of cracks in a tensile residual stressed thin film deposited on a brittle substrate. Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 69:589–596, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© CISM, Udine 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcin Białas
    • 1
  • Zenon Mróz
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Fundamental Technological ResearchPolish Academy of SciencesWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations