Advertisement

Near-Surface Site Characterization Using Surface Waves

  • Glenn J. Rix
Part of the CISM International Centre for Mechanical Sciences book series (CISM, volume 481)

Abstract

Modern surface wave testing methods rely on advanced signal processing and inversion algorithms to extract information about the shear wave velocity profile from observations of Rayleigh wave propagation at the free surface. Extensive use is made of temporal and spatial Fourier transforms to measure Rayleigh wave dispersion. In this context, it is important to understand the influence of finite temporal and spatial sampling on frequency and wavenumber resolution and aliasing. The aperture smoothing function is shown to be a valuable tool to understand these characteristics for a particular receiver array. Four commonly used methods for calculating dispersion curves — Spectral Analysis of Surface Waves (SASW), Multi-Offset Phase Analysis (MOPA), Spatial Autocorrelation (SPAC), and conventional frequency-domain beamforming — are presented and discussed for both active and passive tests.

Surface wave inversion, like most geophysical inverse problems, is ill posed due to finite, uncertain data and modelling errors. To overcome these difficulties, it is possible employ one or more of several strategies that conceptually involve introducing additional information about the inverse problem. Candidates include introducing information about uncertainty in the experimental dispersion data, a priori values of shear wave velocity, and/or desired characteristics of the shear wave velocity profile such as smoothness. Several least squares inversion algorithms are presented that allow the user to incorporate this type of information.

Keywords

Surface Wave Dispersion Curve Shear Wave Velocity Wavenumber Spectrum Shear Wave Velocity Profile 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. K. Aki. Space and time spectra of stationary stochastic waves with special reference to microtremors. Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute, 35:415–456, 1957.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. K. Aki. A note on using microseisms in determining the shallow structures of the Earth’s crust. Geophysics, 30(4):665–666, August 1965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. K. Aki and P. G. Richards. Quantitative Seismology: Theory and Methods. W.H. Freeman and Company, New York, San Francisco 1980.Google Scholar
  4. M. Asten. Control on 3-component spectra of Rayleigh-wave microseisms. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 68:1623–1636, 1978.Google Scholar
  5. J. S. Bendat and A. G. Piersol. Random Data: Analysis and Measurement Procedures. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 2nd edition, 1986.MATHGoogle Scholar
  6. R.D. Borcherdt. Estimates of site-dependent response spectra for design (methodology and justification). Earthquake Spectra, 10:617–653, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. R.N. Bracewell. The Fourier Transform and Its Applications. McGraw-Hill, New York, 2nd edition, 1978.MATHGoogle Scholar
  8. S.C. Constable, R.L. Parker, and G.G. Constable. Occam’s inversion: A practial algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data. Geophysics, 52:289–300, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. N. Gucunski and R. D. Woods. Numerical simulation of the SASW test. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 11:213–227, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. M. Horike. Inversion of phase velocity of long-period microtremors to the S-wave-velocity structure down to the basement in urbanized areas. Journal of the Physics of the Earth, 33:59–96, 1985.Google Scholar
  11. D. H. Johnson and D. E. Dudgeon. Array Signal Processing: Concepts and Techniques. PTR Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 1993.MATHGoogle Scholar
  12. R.T. LaCoss, E.J. Kelly, and M. N. Toksöz. Estimation of seismic noise structure using arrays. Geophysics, 34(1):21–38, February 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. C. G. Lai. Simultaneous Inversion of Rayleigh Phase Velocity and Attenuation for Near-Surface Site Characterization. PhD thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, 1998.Google Scholar
  14. C. G. Lai, G. J. Rix, S. Foti, and V. Roma. Simultaneous measurement and inversion of surface wave dispersion and attenuation curves. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 22:923–930, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. C.G. Lai, S. Foti, and G.J. Rix. Propagation of data uncertainty in surface wave inversion. submitted to Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, 2004.Google Scholar
  16. L.J. Liaw and T.V. McEvilly. Microseisms in geothermal exploration-studies in Grass Valley, Nevada. Geophysics, 44:1097–1115, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. K.T. Marosi and D.R. Hiltunen. Characterization of SASW phase angle and phase velocity measurement uncertainty. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 27(2):205–213, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. G.A. McMechan and M.J. Yedlin. Analysis of dispersive waves by wave field transformation. Geophysics, 46:869–874, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. S. Nazarian. In Situ Determination of Elastic Moduli of Soil Deposits and Pavement Systems by Spectral Analysis of Surface Waves Method. PhD thesis, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, 1984.Google Scholar
  20. M. Ohori, A. Nobata, and K. Wakamatsu. A comparison of ESAC and FK methods of estimating phase velocity using arbitrarily shaped microtremor arrays. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 92(6):2323–2332, August 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. C.B. Park, R.D. Miller, and J. Xia. Multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW). Geophysics, 64:800–808, 1999a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. C.B. Park, R.D. Miller, and J. Xia. Multimodal analysis of high frequency surface waves. In M.H. Powers, L. Cramer, and R.S. Bell, editors, Symposium on the Applications of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems, pages 115–121, Denver, CO, 1999b. Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society.Google Scholar
  23. G. J. Rix, G.L. Hebeler, and M.C. Orozco. Near-surface v s profiling in the New Madrid Seismic Zone using surface-wave methods. Seismological Research Letters, 73(3):380–392, May/June 2002.Google Scholar
  24. G.J. Rix, C.G. Lai, and S. Foti. Simultaneous measurement of surface wave dispersion and attenuation curves. Geotechnical Testing Journal, 24(4):350–358, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. G.J. Rix, C.G. Lai, and A.W. Spang. In situ measurement of damping ratio using surface waves. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 126(5):472–480, May 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. J. M. Roësset, D.W. Chang, and K. H. Stokoe, II. Comparison of 2-D and 3-D models for analysis of surface wave tests. In 5th International Conference on Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, pages 111–126, Karlsruhe, Germany, 1991.Google Scholar
  27. I. Sánchez-Salinero. Analytical Investigation of Seismic Methods Used for Engineering Applications. PhD thesis, University of Texas at Austin, 1987.Google Scholar
  28. J.C. Santamarina and D. Fratta. Introduction to Discrete Signals and Inverse Problems in Civil Engineering. ASCE Press, Reston, Virginia, 1998.Google Scholar
  29. C. Strobbia and S. Foti. Multi-offset phase analysis of surface wave data. submitted to Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2004.Google Scholar
  30. A. Tarantola. Inverse Problem Theory. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1987.MATHGoogle Scholar
  31. K. Tokimatsu. Geotechnical site characterization using surface waves. In Kenji Ishihara, editor, Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering, pages 1333–1368, Rotterdam, 1995. Balkema.Google Scholar
  32. M. N. Toksöz. Microseisms and an attempted application. Geophysics, 39:154–177, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. S. Yoon and G. J. Rix. Combined active-passive surface wave measurements for near-surface site characterization. In Symposium on the Applications of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems, pages 1556–1564. Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society, 2004.Google Scholar
  34. D. J. Zywicki. Advanced Signal Processing Methods Applied to Engineering Analysis of Seismic Surface Waves. PhD thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, 1999.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Glenn J. Rix 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Glenn J. Rix
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Civil and Environmental EngineeringGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations