Gravitational valves: relevant differences with different technical solutions to counteract hydrostatic pressure
Two different technical principles of gravitational valves (G-valves) have been presented: counterbalancer and switcher G-valves. The objective of our prospective study was to look for clinically relevant differences between both.
A total of 54 patients with normal-pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) were treated; 30 patients received an Aesculap-Miethke GA-Valve (GAV; counterbalancer), and in 24 patients an Aesculap-Miethke Dualswitch-Valve (DSV; switcher) was implanted. The opening pressure of the posture-independent valve was 5 cm H2O in both devices. The outcome was clearly better with the usage of the GAV than with the DSV. The frequency and severity of complications was pronounced in the DSV group.
We recommend the Aesculap-Miethke-GAV valve with a low opening pressure in a posture-independent valve for patients with NPH.
KeywordsHydrocephalus normal-pressure hydrocephalus overdrainage shunt
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 7.Hanlo PW, Cinalli G, Vandertop WP, Faber JA, Bogeskov L, Borgensen SE, Boschert J, Chumas P, Eder H, Pople IK, Serlo W, Vitzthum E (2003) Treatment of hydrocephalus determined by the European Orbis Sigma Valve II survey: a multicenter prospective 5-year shunt survival study in children and adults in whom a flow-regulating shunt was used. J Neurosurg 99: 52–57PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Meier U, Kiefer M, Lemcke J (2005) On the optimal opening pressure of hydrostatic valves in cases of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurg Q 15: (in press)Google Scholar
- 17.Richards HK, Seeley HM, Pickard JD (2000) Shunt revisions: Data from the UK shunt registry. Eur J Pediatr Surg [Suppl] 10: 59Google Scholar