Current Designs of Total Ankle Prostheses


Tibial Component Ultrahigh Molecular Weight Polyethylene Ankle Fracture Total Ankle Arthroplasty Mobile Bearing 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Anderson T, Montgomery F, Carlsson A (2003) Uncemented S.T.A.R. total ankle prosthesis. Three to eight-year follow-up of fifty-one consecutive ankles. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85: 1321–1329Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Bonnin M, Judet T, Colombier J, Piriou P, Gravaleau N, Buscayret F (2004) Mid-term results of the SALTO total ankle prosthesis. Clin Orthop 424: 6–18PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Buechel FF, Buechel FF, Pappas MJ (2002) Eighteen-year evaluation of cementless meniscal bearing total ankle replacements. AAOS Instruct. Course Lect., chap 16, pp 143–151Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Buechel FF, Pappas MJ, Iorio LJ (1988) New Jersey low contact stress total ankle replacement: biomechanical rationale and review of 23 cementless cases. Foot Ankle 8: 279–290PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Collier JP, Mayor MB, McNamara JL, Surprenant VA, Jensen RE (1991) Analysis of the failure of 122 polyethylene inserts from uncemented tibial knee components. Clin Orthop 273: 232–242PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Doets HC (1998) The low contact stress Buechel-Pappas total ankle prosthesis. In: Current status of ankle arthroplasty (Kofoed H, ed), chap 6. Springer, Berlin, pp 29–33Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Engh GA, Dwyer KA, Hanes CK (1992) Polyethylene wear of metal-backed tibial components in total and unicompartmental knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 74: 9–17PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Furlong RJ, Osborn JF (1991) Fixation of hip prostheses by hydroxyapatite ceramic coatings. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73: 741–745PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    Gill LH (2002) Principles of joint arthroplasty as applied to the ankle. AAOS Instruct. Course Lect., chap 13, pp 117–128Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Hartman MK, Banks SA, Hodge WA (1997) Wear analysis of a retrieved hip implant with titanium nitride coating. J Arthroplasty 12: 938–945PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Hintermann B (1999) The S.T.A.R. ankle. Short-to midterm experience. Orthopäde 28: 792–803PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Hintermann B, Valderrabano V, Dereymaeker G, Dick W (2004) The HINTEGRA ankle: rationale and short-term results of 122 consecutive ankles. Clin Orthop 424: 57–68Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Hvid I, Rasmussen O, Jensen NC, Nielsen S (1985) Trabecular bone strength profiles at the ankle joint. Clin Orthop 199: 306–312PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adalaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M (1994) Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot-Ankle Int 15: 349–353PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    Kofoed H (1986) A new total ankle joint prosthesis. In: Material sciences and implant orthopaedic surgery (Kossowsky R, Kossowsky N, eds). Martinus-Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp 75–84Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Kofoed H (1995) Cylindrical cemented ankle arthroplasty: a prospective series with long-term follow-up. Foot Ankle Int 16: 474–479PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Kofoed H (1998) Medium-term results of cementless Scandinavian total ankle replacement prosthesis (LINK S.T.A.R.) for osteoarthrosis. In: Current status of ankle arthroplasty (Kofoed H, ed), chap 24. Springer, Berlin, pp 116–120Google Scholar
  18. [18]
    Kofoed H, Danborg L (1995) Biological fixation of ankle arthroplasty. Foot 5: 27–31Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Kofoed H, Sorensen TS (1998) Ankle arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis: prospective long-term study of cemented replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80: 328–332PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Lin S, Drzala M (1998) Independent evaluation of Buechel-Pappas 2nd generation cementless total ankle arthroplasty; intermediateterm results. In: Proc. American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Specialty Day Meeting, New Orleans, USAGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    Long M, Rack HJ (1998) Titanium alloys in total joint replacement: a materials science perspective. Biomaterials 19: 1621–1639PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. [22]
    McIff TE (2002) Design factors affecting the contact stress patterns in a contemporary mobile bearing total ankle replacement. In: Proc. of the 4th Biomechanics World Congress, 4th–9th August, Calgary, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Mendolia G (1998) Ankle arthroplasty — the Ramses prosthesis. In: Current status of ankle arthroplasty (Kofoed H, ed), chap 21. Springer, Berlin, pp 99–105Google Scholar
  24. [24]
    Pappas A, Buechel FF (2002) Principles of condylar joint replacement — design and design evaluation. In: Proc Sir John Charnley International Arthroplasty Symposium, Total Ankle Arthroplasty, June 28th, Wrightington Hospital, UKGoogle Scholar
  25. [25]
    Pappas MJ, Makris G, Buechel FF (1995) Titanium nitride ceramic film against polyethylene. A 48 million cycle wear test. Clin Orthop 317: 64–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. [26]
    Pyevich MT, Saltzman CL, Callaghan JJ, Alvine FG (1998) Total ankle arthroplasty: a unique design. Two to twelve-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80: 1410–1420PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Raimondi MT, Pietrabissa R (2000) The in vivo wear performance of prosthetic femoral heads with titanium bitride coating. Biomaterials 21: 907–913PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Rippstein PF (2003) Clinical experiences with three different designs of ankle prostheses. Foot Ankle Clin 7: 817–831Google Scholar
  29. [29]
    Rudigier J, Grundei H, Menzingerx F (2001) Prosthetic replacement of the ankle in posttraumatic arthrosis. Europ J Trauma 2: 66–74Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    Saltzman CL, Alvine FG (2002) The AGILITY total ankle replacement. AAOS Instruct. Course Lect., chap 14, pp 129–134Google Scholar
  31. [31]
    Saltzman CL, Knecht SL, Callaghan JJ, Estin M, Alvine FG (2004) AGILITY total ankle arthroplasty: a 7 to 16 year follow-up study. In: Proc. AAOS Congress, San Francisco, USAGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    Saltzman CL, McIff TE, Buckwalter JA, Brown TD (2000) Total ankle replacement revisited. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 30: 56–67PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. [33]
    Schernberg F (1998) Current results of ankle arthroplasty: European multi-centre study of cementless ankle arthroplasty. In: Current status of ankle arthroplasty (Kofoed H, ed). Springer, Berlin, pp 41–46Google Scholar
  34. [34]
    Spirt AA, Assal M, Hansen ST Jr (2004) Complications and failures after total ankle arthroplasty. In: J Bone Joint Surg Am 86: 1172–1178PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. [35]
    Stamatis ED, Myerson MS (2002) How to avoid specific complications of total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Clin 7: 765–789CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. [36]
    Stauffer RN (1979) Total joint arthroplasty. The ankle. Mayo Clin Proc 54: 570–575PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. [37]
    Stormont DM, Morrey BF, An KN, Cass JR (1985) Stability of the loaded ankle. Am J Sports Med 13: 295–300PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. [38]
    Takakura Y, Yanaka Y, Sugimoto K, Tamai S, Masuhara K (1990) Ankle arthroplasty. A comparative study of cemented metal and uncemented ceramic prostheses. Clin Orthop 252: 209–216PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    Valderrabano V, Hintermann B, Dick W (2004) Scandinavian total ankle replacement: a 3.7-year average follow-up of 65 patients. Clin Orthop 424: 47–56PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    Valderrabano V, Hintermann B, Nigg BM, Stefanyshyn D, Stergiou P (2003) Kinematic changes after fusion and total replacement of the ankle, part 1: range of motion. Foot Ankle Int 24: 881–887PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    Valderrabano V, Hintermann B, Nigg BM, Stefanyshyn D, Stergiou P (2003) Kinematic changes after fusion and total replacement of the ankle, part 2: movement transfer. Foot Ankle Int 24: 888–896PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. [42]
    Wood PL, Deakin S (2003) Total ankle replacement. The results in 200 ankles. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85: 334–341CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. [43]
    Wood PLR, Clough TM (2004) Mobile bearing ankle replacement: clinical and radiographic comparison of two designs. In: Proc. AAOS Congress, San Francisco, USAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 2005

Personalised recommendations