Advertisement

History of Total Ankle Arthroplasty

Keywords

Ankle Joint Tibial Component Total Ankle Arthroplasty Total Ankle Replacement Talar Component 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Alexakis P, Smith RC, Wellish M (1977) Indications for ankle fusion versus total ankle replacement versus pantalar fusion. Orthop Trans 1: 87Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Alvine FG (1991) Total ankle arthroplasty: new concepts and approaches. Contemp Orthop 22: 397–403PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    Alvine FG (2000) Total ankle arthroplasty. In: Foot and ankle disorders (Myerson MS, ed), chap 45. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 1085–1102Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Alvine FG (2002) The AGILITY ankle replacement: the good and the bad. Foot Ankle Clin 7: 737–754PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Anderson T, Montgomery F, Carlssonx A (2003) Uncemented S.T.A.R. total ankle prosthesis. Three to eight-year follow-up of fifty-one consecutive ankles. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85: 1321–1329PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    Asencio J (2001) The AES total ankle. In: Proc. Int. Day of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Nīimes, FranceGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    Bamert P (1978) Endoprosthesis in the region of the ankle with special reference to the ICLH prosthesis. Ther Umsch 35: 342–349PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    Bauer G, Eberhardt O, Rosenbaum D, Claes L (1996) Total ankle replacement. Review and critical analysis of the current status. Foot Ankle Surg 2: 119–126Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Bolton-Maggs BG, Sudlow RA, Freeman MA (1985) Total ankle arthroplasty. A long-term review of the London Hospital experience. J Bone Joint Surg Br 67: 785–790PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    Bonnin M, Judet T, Colombier J, Piriou P, Gravaleau N, Buscayret F (2004) Mid-term results of the first 98 consecutive SALTO total ankle arthroplasties. In: Proc. AAOS Congress, San Francisco, USAGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    Buchholz HW, Engelbrecht E, Siegel A (1973) Complete ankle joint endoprosthesis type “St. Georg.” Chirurg 44: 241–244PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    Buechel FF (1979) Complications of 292 total ankle replacements. In: Proc. 9th Annual Meeting of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, San Francisco, USAGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    Buechel FF (1991) Total ankle replacement: state of the art. In: Disorders of the foot and ankle (Jahss MH, ed). Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 2671–2687Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Buechel FF, Buechel FF, Pappas MJ (2002) Eighteen-year evaluation of cementless meniscal bearing total ankle replacements. AAOS Instruct. Course Lect., chap 16, pp 143–151Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Buechel FF, Pappas MJ (1980) Failure mode of cylindrical total ankle replacement. In: Proc. 10th Annual Meeting of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, Atlanta, USAGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    Buechel FF, Pappas MJ (1992) Survivorship and clinical evaluation of cementless, meniscal-bearing total ankle replacements. Semin Arthroplasty 3: 43–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Buechel FF, Pappas MJ, Iorio LJ (1988) New Jersey low contact stress total ankle replacement: biomechanical rationale and review of 23 cementless cases. Foot Ankle 8: 279–290PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Calderale PM, Garro A, Barbiero R, Fasolio G, Pipino F (1983) Biomechanical design of the total ankle prosthesis. Eng Med 12: 69–80PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. [19]
    Carlsson AS, Henricson AS, Linder L (1994) A survival analysis of 52 Bath-Wessex ankle replacements. Foot 4: 34–40Google Scholar
  20. [20]
    Carlsson AS, Henricson AS, Linder L, Nilsson JA (1998) Medium-term results in rheumatoid arthritis with the Bath and Wessex ankle prosthesis. In: Current status of ankle arthroplasty (Kofoed H, ed), chap 18. Springer, Berlin, pp 86–89Google Scholar
  21. [21]
    Carlsson AS, Henricson AS, Linder L, Nilsson JA, Redlund-Johnell I (2001) A 10-year survival analysis of 69 Bath and Wessex ankle replacements. Foot Ankle Surg 7: 39–44Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    Chauveaux D, Laffenetre O, Liquois F (2002) The AKILE C.L.L. ankle. In: Proc. of the Int. Day of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Nīimes, FranceGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    Coester LM, Saltzman CL, Leupold J, Pontarelli W (2001) Long-term results following ankle arthrodesis for posttraumatic arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83: 219–228PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    Coughlin MJ (2002) The Scandinavian total ankle replacement prosthesis. AAOS Instruct. Course Lect., chap 15, pp 135–142Google Scholar
  25. [25]
    Das AKJR (1988) Total ankle arthroplasty. A review of 37 cases. J Ten Med Assoc 81: 682–685Google Scholar
  26. [26]
    De Bastiani G, Vecchini L (1981) Arthroprosthesis of the ankle joint. Ital J Orthop Traumatol 7: 31–39PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. [27]
    Demottaz JD, Mazur JM, Thomas WH, Sledge CB, Simon SR (1979) Clinical study of total ankle replacement with gait analysis. A preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 61: 976–988PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. [28]
    Dini A, Bassett III FH (1980) Evaluation of the early result of Smith total ankle replacement. Clin Orthop 146: 228–230PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. [29]
    Doets HC (1998): The low contact stress Buechel-Pappas total ankle prosthesis. In: Current status of ankle arthroplasty, (Kofoed H, ed), chap 6. Springer, Berlin, pp 29–33Google Scholar
  30. [30]
    Easley ME, Vertullo CJ, Urban WC, Nunley JA (2002) Total ankle arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 10: 157–167PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. [31]
    Endrich B, Terbruggen D (1991) Endoprosthesis of the ankle joint. Indications and long-term results. Unfallchirurg 94: 525–530PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. [32]
    Engelbrecht E (1975) Ankle-joint endoprosthesis model “St. George.” Z Orthop Grenzgeb 113: 546–548Google Scholar
  33. [33]
    Evanski PM, Waugh TR (1977) Management of arthritis of the ankle. An alternative to arthrodesis. Clin Orthop 122: 110–115PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. [34]
    Freeman MA, Kempson GE, Tuke MA(1979) Total replacement of the ankle with the ICLH prosthesis. Int Orthop 2: 237–331Google Scholar
  35. [35]
    Funke E, Rippstein P, Munzinger U (1988) First experience and early results with an uncemented total ankle arthroplasty. In: Current status of ankle arthroplasty (Kofoed H, ed), chap 17. Springer, Berlin, pp 83–85Google Scholar
  36. [36]
    Giannini S, Leardini A, O’Connor JJ (2000) Total ankle replacement: review of the designs and of the current status. Foot Ankle Surg 6: 77–88Google Scholar
  37. [37]
    Gill LH (2002) Principles of joint arthroplasty as applied to the ankle. AAOS Instruct. Course Lect., chap 13, pp 117–128Google Scholar
  38. [38]
    Gittins J, Mann RA (2002) The history of the STAR total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Clin 7: 809–817PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. [39]
    Goldie I, Herberts P (1981) Prosthetic replacement of the ankle joint. Reconstr Surg Traumatol 18: 205–210PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. [40]
    Gould JS, Alvine FG, Mann RA, Sanders RW, Walling AK (2000) Total ankle replacement: a surgical discussion. Part I. Replacement systems, indications, and contraindications. Am J Orthop 29: 604–609PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. [41]
    Gould JS, Alvine FG, Mann RA, Sanders RW, Walling AK (2000) Total ankle replacement: a surgical discussion. Part II. The clinical and surgical experience. Am J Orthop 29: 675–682PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. [42]
    Groth HE (1983) Total ankle replacement with the Oregon ankle: evaluation of 44 patients followed two to seven years. Orthop Trans 7: 488–489Google Scholar
  43. [43]
    Groth HE, Fitch HF (1987) Salvage procedures for complications of total ankle arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 224: 244–250PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. [44]
    Groth HE, Shen GS, Fagan PJ (1977) The Oregon ankle: a total ankle designed to replace all three articular surfaces. Orthop Trans 1: 86Google Scholar
  45. [45]
    Hamblen DL (1985) Editorial. Can the ankle joint be replaced? J Bone Joint Surg Br 67: 689–690PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. [46]
    Hansen ST, Jr. (1998) Cementless ankle arthroplasty in the United States of America. In: Current status of ankle arthroplasty (Kofoed H, ed), chap 8. Springer, Berlin, pp 37–40Google Scholar
  47. [47]
    Hay SM, Smith TW (1994) Total ankle arthroplasty: a long-term review. Foot 4: 1–5Google Scholar
  48. [48]
    Helm R, Stevens J (1986) Long-term results of total ankle replacement. J Arthroplasty 1: 271–277PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. [49]
    Herberts P, Goldie IF, Korner L, Larsson U, Lindborg G, Zachrisson BE (1982) Endoprosthetic arthroplasty of the ankle joint. A clinical and radiological follow-up. Acta Orthop Scand 53: 687–696PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. [50]
    Hintermann B (1999) The S.T.A.R. ankle. Short-to midterm experience. Orthopäde 28: 792–803PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. [51]
    Hintermann B, Klinke M, Valderrabano V (2002) Preliminary results of a new ankle design. Med Chir Pied 18: 158–165Google Scholar
  52. [52]
    Hintermann B, Valderrabano V (2003) Total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Clin 8: 375–405PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. [53]
    Hintermann B, Valderrabano V, Dereymaeker G, Dick W (2004) The HINTEGRA ankle: rationale and short-term results of 122 consecutive ankles. Clin Orthop 424: 57–68PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. [54]
    Hintermann B, Valderrabano V, Klinke M (2004) First results with the HINTEGRA total ankle prosthesis. Foot Ankle Surg (in press)Google Scholar
  55. [55]
    Huber H, Kellenberger R, Huber M (1998) Scandinavian total ankle replacement (LINK S.T.A.R.). In: Current status of ankle arthroplasty (Kofoed H, ed), chap 22. Springer, Berlin, pp 106–110Google Scholar
  56. [56]
    Jarde O, Gabrion A, Meire P, Trinquier-Lautard JL, Vives P (1997) Complications and failures of a total ankle prosthesis. Apropos of 21 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 83: 645–651PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. [57]
    Jari S, Wood P (2002) A comparison of the outcome following two different total ankle replacement systems in rheumatoid arthritis. In: Proc. Annual Congress of the British Orthopaedic Association, Cardiff, UKGoogle Scholar
  58. [58]
    Jensen NC, Kroner K (1992) Total joint replacement: a clinical follow-up. Orthopaedics 15: 236–239Google Scholar
  59. [59]
    Judet T, Colombier JA, Bonnin M, Piriou P, Siguier T, Elis JB (2001) The SALTO total ankle. In: Proc. of the Int. Day of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Nīimes, FranceGoogle Scholar
  60. [60]
    Kaukonen JP, Raunio P (1983) Total ankle replacement in rheumatoid arthritis: a preliminary review of 28 arthroplasties in 24 patients. Ann Chir Gyn 72: 196–199Google Scholar
  61. [61]
    Keblish A (1990) Porous coat New Jersey Ankle. Technical Report 1990.Google Scholar
  62. [62]
    Kempson GE, Freeman MA, Tuk MA (1975) Engineering considerations in the design of an ankle joint. Biomed Eng 10: 166–180PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. [63]
    Kirkup J (1985) Richard Smith ankle arthroplasty. J R Soc Med 78: 301–304PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. [64]
    Kirkup J (1990) Rheumatoid arthritis and ankle surgery. Ann Rheum Dis 49Suppl 2: 837–844PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. [65]
    Kitaoka HB (1991) Salvage of nonunion following ankle arthrodesis for failed total ankle arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 268: 37–43PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. [66]
    Kitaoka HB, Patzer GL (1996) Clinical results of the Mayo total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 78: 1658–1664PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. [67]
    Kitaoka HB, Patzer GL, Strup DMI, Wallrichs SI (1994) Survivorship analysis of the Mayo total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76: 974–979PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. [68]
    ai]Kitaoka HB, Romness DW (1992) Arthrodesis for failed ankle arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 7: 277–284PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. [69]
    Kofoed H (1986) A new total ankle joint prosthesis. In: Material sciences and implant orthopaedic surgery (Kossowsky R, Kossowsky N, eds). Martinus-Nijhoff, Dordrecht, pp 75–84Google Scholar
  70. [70]
    Kofoed H (1995) Cylindrical cemented ankle arthroplasty: a prospective series with long-term follow-up. Foot Ankle Int 16: 474–479PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. [71]
    Kofoed H (1998) Comparison of cemented and cementless ankle arthroplasty. In: Current status of ankle arthroplasty (Kofoed H, ed), chap 10. Springer, Berlin, pp 47–49Google Scholar
  72. [72]
    Kofoed H (1998) Medium-term results of cementless Scandinavian total ankle replacement prosthesis (LINK S.T.A.R.) for osteoarthrosis. In: Current status of ankle arthroplasty (Kofoed H, ed), chap 24. Springer, Berlin, pp 116–120Google Scholar
  73. [73]
    Kofoed H, Danborg L (1995) Biological fixation of ankle arthroplasty. Foot 5: 27–31Google Scholar
  74. [74]
    Kofoed H, Sorensen TS (1998) Ankle arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis: prospective long-term study of cemented replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80: 328–332PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. [75]
    Kofoed H, Stürup J (1994) Comparison of ankle arthroplasty and arthrodesis. Aprospective series with long-term follow-up. Foot 4: 6–9Google Scholar
  76. [76]
    Kostli A, Huber M, Huber H (1999) Short-term follow-up of a series of 21 uncemented total ankle prostheses. Swiss Surg 5: 265–270PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. [77]
    Kumar DJR (1988) Total ankle arthroplasty: Areview of 37 cases. J Tenn Med Assoc 81: 682–685PubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. [78]
    Lachiewicz PF, Inglis AE, Ranawat CS (1984) Total ankle replacement in rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66: 340–343PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. [79]
    Leardini A (2001) Geometry and mechanics of the human ankle complex and ankle prosthesis design. Clin Biomech 16: 706–709Google Scholar
  80. [80]
    Leardini A, O’Connor JJ, Catani F, Giannini S (1999) A geometric model of the human ankle joint. J Biomech 32: 585–591PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. [81]
    Lewis G (1994) The ankle joint prosthetic replacement: clinical performance and research challenges. Foot Ankle Int 15: 471–476PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. [82]
    Lin S, Drzala M (1998) Independent evaluation of Buechel-Pappas 2nd generation cementless total ankle arthroplasty; Intermediate-term results. In: Proc. American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Specialty Day Meeting, New Orleans, USAGoogle Scholar
  83. [83]
    Lord G, Marotte JH (1973) Total ankle prosthesis. Technique and 1st results. Apropos of 12 cases. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 59: 139–151Google Scholar
  84. [84]
    Lord G, Marotte JH (1980) Total ankle replacement. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 66: 527–530PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. [85]
    Lundberg A, Svennson OK, Nemeth G, Selvik G (1989) The axis of rotation of the ankle joint. J Bone Joint Surg Br 71: 94–99PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. [86]
    Marsh CH, Kirkup JR, Regan MW (1987) The Bath and Wessex ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 69: 153–154Google Scholar
  87. [87]
    Mendolia G (1998) Ankle arthroplasty — the Ramses prosthesis. Current status of ankle arthroplasty (Kofoed H, ed), chap 21. Springer, Berlin, pp 99–105Google Scholar
  88. [88]
    Mendolia G (2000) The ramses ankle — concept and realization. In: Proc. Int. Day of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Nīimes, FranceGoogle Scholar
  89. [89]
    Natens P, Matricali GA, Dereymaeker G (2002) Pellenburg results after seven years experience with the S.T.A.R. uncemented total ankle prosthesis. The Pellenburg Orthopaedic Yearbook, pp 46–53Google Scholar
  90. [90]
    Newton SE (1979) An artificial ankle joint. Clin Orthop 142: 141–145PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. [91]
    Newton SE (1982) Total ankle arthroplasty. In: Disorders of the foot and ankle (Jahss MH, ed). Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 816–825Google Scholar
  92. [92]
    Newton SE (1982) Total ankle arthroplasty. Clinical study of fifty cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64: 104–111PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. [93]
    Nogarin L, Rebeccato A, Santini S, Salmaso GP (1999) S.T.A.R. total ankle 90: our experience. Ital J Orthop Traumatol 25: 183–191Google Scholar
  94. [94]
    ai]Pappas M, Buechel FF, DePalma AF (1976) Cylindrical total ankle joint replacement: surgical and biomechanical rationale. Clin Orthop 188: 82–92Google Scholar
  95. [95]
    Procter P, Paul JP (1982) Ankle joint biomechanics. J Biomech 15: 627–634PubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. [96]
    Pyevich MT, Saltzman CL, Callaghan JJ, Alvine FG (1998) Total ankle arthroplasty: a unique design. Two to twelve-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80: 1410–1420PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. [97]
    Rippstein PF (2003) Clinical experiences with three different designs of ankle prostheses. Foot Ankle Clin 7: 817–831Google Scholar
  98. [98]
    Rudigier J, Grundei H, Menzinger F (2001) Prosthetic replacement of the ankle in posttraumatic arthrosis. Europ J Trauma 2: 66–74Google Scholar
  99. [99]
    Saltzman CL (2000) Perspective on total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Clin 5: 761–775PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. [100]
    Saltzman CL, Alvine FG (2002) The AGILITY total ankle replacement. AAOS Instruct. Course Lect., chap 14, pp 129–134Google Scholar
  101. [101]
    Saltzman CL, Knecht SL, Callaghan JJ, Estin M, Alvine FG (2004) AGILITY total ankle arthroplasty: a 7 to 16 year follow-up study. In: Proc. AAOS Congress, San Francisco, USAGoogle Scholar
  102. [102]
    Samuelson KM, Freeman MA, Tuke MA (1982) Development and evolution of the ICLH ankle replacement. Foot Ankle 3: 32–36PubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. [103]
    Sandberg ST, Kofoed H (1998) Cemented ankle arthroplasty for osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis — long-term results. In: Current status of ankle arthroplasty (Kofoed H, ed), chap 20. Springer, Berlin, pp 94–96Google Scholar
  104. [104]
    Schernberg F (1998) Current results of ankle arthroplasty: European multi-centre study of cementless ankle arthroplasty. In: Current status of ankle arthroplasty (Kofoed H, ed), Springer, Berlin, pp 41–46Google Scholar
  105. [105]
    Schill S, Biehl C, Thabe H (1998) Prosthetic replacement of the ankle. Mid-term results with the Thompson-Richards and S.T.A.R. ankles. Orthopäde 27: 183–187CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. [106]
    Schill S, Thabe H (1998) Ankle arthroplasty: a clinical follow-up. In: Current status of ankle arthroplasty (Kofoed H, ed), chap 19. Springer, Berlin, pp 90–93Google Scholar
  107. [107]
    Scholz KC (1976) Total ankle replacement arthroplasty. In: Foot science (Bateman JE, ed). Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 106–135Google Scholar
  108. [108]
    Scholz KC (1987) Total ankle arthroplasty using biological fixation components compared to ankle arthrodesis. Orthopaedics 10: 125–131Google Scholar
  109. [109]
    Schreiber A, Dexel M, Zollinger H (1978) A new ankle joint total endoprosthesis. Zorthop Ihre Grenzgeb 116: 595–596Google Scholar
  110. [110]
    Stauffer RN (1976) Total ankle joint replacement as an alternative to arthrodesis. Geriatrics 31: 79–85Google Scholar
  111. [111]
    Stauffer RN (1977) Total ankle joint replacement. Arch Surg 112: 1105–1109PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. [112]
    Stauffer RN (1979) Total joint arthroplasty. The ankle. Mayo Clin Proc 54: 570–575PubMedGoogle Scholar
  113. [113]
    Stauffer RN, Chao EY, Brewster RC (1977) Force and motion analysis of the normal, diseased, and prosthetic ankle joint. Clin Orthop 127: 189–196PubMedGoogle Scholar
  114. [114]
    Stauffer RN, Segal NM (1981) Total ankle arthroplasty: four years’ experience. Clin Orthop 160: 217–221PubMedGoogle Scholar
  115. [115]
    Swanson SA, Freeman MA, Heath JC (1973) Laboratory tests on total joint replacement prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 55: 759–773PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. [116]
    Takakura Y, Tanaka Y, Akiyama S (1996) Results of total ankle arthroplasty. J Foot Surg 11: 9–16Google Scholar
  117. [117]
    Takakura Y, Yanaka Y, Sugimoto K, Tamai S, Masuhara K (1990) Ankle arthroplasty. A comparative study of cemented metal and uncemented ceramic prostheses. Clin Orthop 252: 209–216PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. [118]
    Teigland CJ (1990) Revisional surgery after failure of total replacement prosthesis of the ankle joint in rheumatoid patients. Rheumatology 13: 87–91Google Scholar
  119. [119]
    Tillmann K, Schaar B (1998) Cemented and uncemented ankle endoprosthesis: clinical and podographic results. In: Current status of ankle arthroplasty (Kofoed H, ed), chap 5. Springer, Berlin, pp 22–28Google Scholar
  120. [120]
    Tragern D (1981) Follow-up study of 5 St. George ankle prostheses. Unfallheilkunde 84: 390–392PubMedGoogle Scholar
  121. [121]
    Unger AS, Inglis AE, Mow CS, Figgie HEI (1988) Total ankle arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis: a long-term follow-up study. Foot Ankle 8: 173–179PubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. [122]
    Valderrabano V, Hintermann B, Dick W (2004) Scandinavian total ankle replacement: a 3.7-year average follow-up of 65 patients. Clin Orthop 424: 47–56PubMedGoogle Scholar
  123. [123]
    Valderrabano V, Hintermann B, Nigg BM, Stefanyshyn D, Stergiou P (2003) Kinematic changes after fusion and total replacement of the ankle, part 1: range of motion. Foot Ankle Int 24: 881–887PubMedGoogle Scholar
  124. [124]
    Valderrabano V, Hintermann B, Nigg BM, Stefanyshyn D, Stergiou P (2003) Kinematic changes after fusion and total replacement of the ankle, part 2: movement transfer. Foot Ankle Int 24: 888–896PubMedGoogle Scholar
  125. [125]
    Valderrabano V, Hintermann B, Nigg BM, Stefanyshyn D, Stergiou P (2003) Kinematic changes after fusion and total replacement of the ankle, part 3: talar movement. Foot Ankle Int 24: 897–900PubMedGoogle Scholar
  126. [126]
    Voegeli AV (1998) Our experience with a spherical ankle replacement. In: Current status of ankle arthroplasty (Kofoed H, ed), chap 23. Springer, Berlin, pp 111–115Google Scholar
  127. [127]
    Wang Y, Dai K (1995) Long-term results of total ankle replacement. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi 33: 359–361Google Scholar
  128. [128]
    Waugh TR, Evanski PM, McMaster WC (1976) Irvine ankle arthroplasty. Prosthetic design and surgical technique. Clin Orthop 114: 180–184PubMedGoogle Scholar
  129. [129]
    Wiedel JD (1977) Total ankle arthroplasty with Smith prosthesis. Orthop Trans 1: 154–155Google Scholar
  130. [130]
    Wood PL, Deakin S (2003) Total ankle replacement. The results in 200 ankles. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85: 334–341CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. [131]
    Wood PLR (1998) Total ankle replacement (LINK S.T.A.R.) for rheumatoid arthritis. In: Current status of ankle arthroplasty (Kofoed H, ed), chap 7. Springer, Berlin, pp 34–36Google Scholar
  132. [132]
    Wood PLR (2003) Experience with the STAR ankle arthroplasty at Wrightington Hospital, UK. Foot Ankle Clin 7: 755–765Google Scholar
  133. [133]
    Wood PLR, Clough TM (2004) Mobile bearing ankle replacement: clinical and radiographic comparison of two designs. In: Proc. AAOS Congress, San Francisco, USAGoogle Scholar
  134. [134]
    Wood PLR, Clough TM, Jari S (2000) Clinical comparison of two total ankle replacements. Foot Ankle Int 21: 546–550PubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. [135]
    Wynn AH, Wilde AH (1992) Long-term follow-up of the CONAXIAL (Beck-Steffee) total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle 13: 303–306PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag/Wien 2005

Personalised recommendations