Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Le dépistage du cancer colorectal pp 57–99Cite as

Dépistage du cancer colorectal par endoscopie classique ou coloscopie virtuelle

  • Chapter

  • 253 Accesses

Part of the book series: Dépistage et cancer ((DC))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. Agence Nationale pour le Développement de l’Évaluation Médicale (1996) Endoscopies digestives basses. Recommandations et références médicales. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 20: 881–96

    Google Scholar 

  2. Conférence de consensus (1998) Prévention, dépistage et prise en charge des cancers du côlon. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 22: 205–8

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anonymous (2001) Recommendations on cancer screening in the European Union. Bull Cancer 88: 687–92

    Google Scholar 

  4. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (2000) Guidelines for CRC screening and surveillance. Gastrointest Endosc 51: 777–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. American College of Gastroenterology. Rex DK, Johnson DA, Lieberman DA et al. (2000) CRC prevention 2000: screening recommendations of the American College of Gastroenterology. Am J Gastroenterol 95: 868–77

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Anonymous (2002) CRC prevention. Med J Aust 176: 145–46

    Google Scholar 

  7. Winawer S, Fletcher R, Rex D et al. for the US Multisociety Task Force on CRC (2003) CRC screening and surveillance: clinical guidelines and rationales-update based on new evidence. Gastroenterology 124: 544–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rozen P, Blanchard J, Campbell D et al. (2004) Implementing colorectal cancer screening: group 2 report. Endoscopy 36: 354–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson DA, Gurney MS, Volpe RJ et al. (1990) A prospective study of the prevalence of colonic neoplasms in asymptomatic patients with an age-related risk. Am J Gastroenterol 85: 969–74

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Rex DK, Lehman GA, Hawes RH et al. (1991) Screening colonoscopy in asymptomatic average-risk persons with negative fecal occult blood tests. Gastroenterology 100: 64–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. DiSario JA, Foutch PG, Mai HD (1991) Prevalence and malignant potential of colorectal polyps in asymptomatic, average-risk men. Am J Gastroenterol 86:941–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lieberman DA, Smith FW (1991) Screening for colon malignancy with colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 86: 946–51

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Foutch PG, DiSario JA, Pardy K (1991) The sentinel hyperplastic polyp: a marker for synchronous neoplasia in the proximal colon. Am J Gastroenterol 86:1482–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Foutch PG, Mai H, Pardy K (1991) Flexible sigmoidoscopy may be ineffective for secondary prevention of CRC in asymptomatic, average-risk men. Dig Dis Sci 36: 924–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rex DK, Smith JJ, Ulbright TM, Lehman GA (1992) Distal colonic hyperplastic polyps do not predict proximal adenomas in asymptomatic average-risk subjects. Gastroenterology 102: 317–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rex DK, Lehman GA, Ulbright TM et al. (1993) Colonic neoplasia in asymptomatic persons with negative fecal occult blood tests: influence of age, gender, and family history. Am J Gastroenterol 88: 825–31

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kadakia SC, Wrobleski CS, Kadakia AS, Meier NJ (1996) Prevalence of proximal colonic polyps in average-risk asymptomatic patients with negative fecal occult blood tests and flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 44: 112–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Read TE, Read JD, Butterly LF (1997) Importance of colonic adenomas 5 mm or less in diameter that are detected by sigmoidoscopy. N Engl J Med 336: 8–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wallace MB, Kemp JA, Trnka YM et al. (1998) Is colonoscopy indicated for small adenomas found by screening flexible sigmoidoscopy? Ann Intern Med 129:273–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Nicholson FB, Korman MG, Stern AI, Hansky J (2000) Distribution of colorectal adenomas: implications for bowel cancer screening. Med J Aust 172: 428–30

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ikeda Y, Mori M, Miyazaki M et al. (2000) Significance of small distal adenoma for detection of proximal neoplasms in the colorectum. Gastrointest Endosc 52:358–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rosen DM, Sanchez NC, Whitlow CB et al. (2003) Significant findings on screening colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 46: A51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Bond JH et al. for Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380 (2000) Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for CRC. N Engl J Med 343: 162–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Collet JA, Olynyk JK, Platell CF (2000) Flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for CRC in average-risk people: update of a community-based project. Med J Aust 173: 463–6

    Google Scholar 

  25. Imperiale TF, Wagner DR, Lin CY et al. (2000) Risk of advanced proximal neoplasms in asymptomatic adults according to the distal colorectal findings. N Engl J Med 343: 169–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, for Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group (2001) One-time screening for CRC with combined fecal occult-blood testing and examination of the distal colon. N Engl J Med 345: 555–60

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Chiu HM, Wang HP, Lee YC (2005) A prospective study of the frequency and the topographical distribution of colon neoplasia in asymptomatic average-risk Chinese adults as determined by colonoscopic screening. Gastrointest Endosc 61: 547–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Schoenfeld P, Cash B, Flood A et al. for the ConCern Study Investigators (2005) Colonoscopic screening of average-risk women for colorectal neoplasia. N Engl J Med 352: 2061–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Imperiale TF, Wagner DR, Lin CY (2002) Results of screening colonoscopy among persons 40 to 49 years of age. N Engl J Med 346: 1781–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sung JJY, Chan FKL, Leung WK et al. (2003) Screening for CRC in Chinese: comparison of fecal occult blood test, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 124: 608–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Soon MS, Kozarek RA, Ayub K et al. (2005) Screening colonoscopy in Chinese and western patients: a comparative study. Am J Gastroenterol 100: 2749–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Harewood GC, Lieberman DA (2003) Prevalence of advanced neoplasia at screening colonoscopy in men in private practice versus academic and veterans affairs medical centers. Am J Gastroenterol 98: 2312–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Wu K, Titzer D, Soetikno R, Triadafilopoulos G (2003) Use of a colonoscope instead of a sigmoidoscope to screen asymptomatic adults for CRC. Gastrointest Endosc 58: 720–4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Betes M, Munoz-Navas MA, Duque JM et al. (2003) Use of colonoscopy as a primary screening test for CRC in average-risk people. Am J Gastroenterol 98:2648–54

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Selby J, Friedman G, Quesenberry CP Jr, Weiss NS (1992) A case-control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from CRC. N Engl J Med 326: 653–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Newcomb PA, Norfleet RG, Storer BE et al. (1992) Screening sigmoidoscopy and CRC mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst 84: 1572–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Müller A, Sonnenberg A (1995) Prevention of CRC by flexible endoscopy and polypectomy. A case-controlled study of 32,702 veterans. Ann Intern Med 123:904–10

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Müller AD, Sonnenberg A (1995) Protection by endoscopy against death from CRC. A case-control study among veterans. Arch Intern Med 155: 1741–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Kavanagh AM, Giovannucci EL, Fuchs CS, Colditz GA (1998) Screening endoscopy and risk of CRC in United States men. Cancer Causes Control 9: 455–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Slattery ML, Edwards SL, Ma KN, Friedman GD (2000) Colon cancer screening, lifestyle, and risk of colon cancer. Cancer Causes Control 11: 555–63

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Brenner H, Arndt V, Stürmer T et al. (2001) Long-lasting reduction of risk of CRC following screening endoscopy. Br J Cancer 85: 972–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Newcomb PA, Storer BE, Morimoto LM (2003) Long-term efficacy of sigmoidoscopy in the reduction of CRC incidence. J Natl Cancer Inst 95: 622–5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Atkin WS, Morson BC, Cuzick J (1992) Long-term risk of CRC after excision of rectosigmoid adenomas. N Engl J Med 326: 658–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Winawer S.J, Stewart ET, Zauber AG et al. (1993) Prevention of CRC by colonoscopic polypectomy. N Engl J Med 329: 1977–83

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Citarda F, Tomaselli G, Capocaccia R et al. The Italian Multicentre Study Group (2001) Efficacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing CRC incidence. Gut 48: 812–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Brevinge H, Lindholm E, Buntzen S, Kewenter J (1997) Screening for colorectal neoplasia with fæcal occult blood testing compared with flexible sigmoidoscopy directly in a 55–56 year old population. Int J Colorect Dis 12: 291–5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Thiis-Evensen E, Hoff GS, Sauar J et al. (1999) Population-based surveillance by colonoscopy: effect of the incidence of CRC. Telemark polyp study I. Scand J Gastroenterol 34: 414–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Gohagan JK, Prorok PC, Hayes RB, Kramer BS, for the PLCO Project Team (2000) The prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial of the National Cancer Institute: history, organization, and status. Control Clin Trials 21: 251S–272S

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Bresalier RS, Pinsky P, Weis RS Seld J et al. (2002) Effectiveness of nurse endoscopists in the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial. Gastroenterology 122: A479

    Google Scholar 

  50. Segnan N, Senore C, Andreoni B, et al. and the Score Working Group (2002) Baseline findings of the Italian multicenter randomized controlled trial of “once-only sigmoidoscopy”-Score. J Natl Cancer Inst 94: 1763–72

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Segnan V, Andreoni B, Bisanti L et al. (2002) Comparing different screening strategies for CRC. Gastroenterology 122: A483

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Segnan V, Andreoni B, Bisanti L et al. (2004) Colonoscopy screening for CRC: a comparison study in Italy (abstract). Gastroenterology 126: A198

    Google Scholar 

  53. Segnan N, Senore C, Andreoni B et al. (2005) Randomized trial of different screening strategies for colorectal cancer: patient response and detection rates. J Natl Cancer Inst 97: 347–57

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Church T et al. (2002) National colonoscopy study preliminary results: a randomized controlled trial of general population screening colonoscopy (abstract). Gastroenterology 122: A480

    Google Scholar 

  55. Gondal G, Grotmol T, Hofstad B et al. (2003) The Norwegian CRC prevention (NORCCAP) screening study: baseline findings and implementations for clinical work-up in age groups 50–64 years. Scand J Gastroenterol 38: 635–42

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. UK Flexible Sigmoidoscopy Screening Trial Investigators (2002) Single flexible sigmoidosocpy screening to prevent CRC: baseline findings of a UK multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 359: 1291–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Nuernberg D, Peters M, Pommerien W (2005) Brandenburg against colon cancer — first results of an exemplary, concerted action to improve early detection of colorectal cancer in a federal state in Germany. Gut 54: A34

    Google Scholar 

  58. Hoff G, Thiis-Evensen E, Grotmol T et al. (2001) Do undesirable effect of screening affect all-cause mortality in flexible sigmoidoscopy programmes? Experience from the Telemark polyp study 1983–1996. Eur J Cancer Prevent 10:131–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Atkin W, Rogers P, Cardwell C (2004) Wide variation in adenoma detection rates at screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gastroenterology 126: 1247–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Pinsky PF, Schoen RE, WeisRSSeld JL et al. for the PLCO Project Team (2005) Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 3 (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Schoen RE, Pinsky PF, WeisRSSeld JL et al. for the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial Group (2003) Results of repeat sigmoidoscopy 3 years after a negative examination. JAMA 290: 41–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Winawer SJ, Flehinger BJ, Schottenfeld D, Miller DG (1993) Screening for CRC with fecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy. J Natl Cancer Inst 85: 1311–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Rasmussen M, Kronborg O, Fenger C, Jorgensen OD (1999) Possible advantages and drawbacks of adding flexible sigmoidoscopy to Hemoccult-II in screening for CRC. A randomized study. Scand J Gastroenterol 34: 73–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Berry DP, Clarke P, Hardcastle JD, Vellacott KD (1997) Randomized trial of the addition of flexible sigmoidoscopy to fæcal occult blood testing for colorectal neoplasia population screening. Br J Surg 84: 1274–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Verne JECW, Aubrey R, Love SB et al. (1998) Population based randomised study of uptake and yield screening by flexible sigmoidoscopy compared with screening by fæcal occult blood testing. Br Med J 317: 182–5

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Hoff H, Gondal G, Grotmol T et al. (2003) Adding FOBT to once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) screening program reduces compliance without improving the yield for significant lesions (abstract). Gastroenterology 124: A20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Rasmussen M, Fenger C, Kronborg O (2003) Diagnostic yield in a biennial Hemoccult-II screening program compared to a once-only screening with flexible sigmoidoscopy and Hemoccult-II. Scand J Gastroenterol 38: 114–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MHE et al. (1996) Randomized controlled trial of fæcal-blood screening for CRC. Lancet 348: 1472–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Scholefield JH, Moss S, Sufi F et al. (2002) Effect of fæcal occult blood screening on mortality form CRC: results from a randomised controlled trial. Gut 50: 840–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Achkar E, Carey W (1988) Small polyps found during fiberoptic sigmoidoscopy in asymptomatic patients. Ann Intern Med 109: 880–3

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Brady PG, Straker RJ, McClave SA (1993) Are hyperplastic rectosigmoid polyps associated with an increased risk of proximal colonic neoplasms? Gastrointest Endosc 39: 481–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Zarchy TM, Ershoff D (1994) Do characteristics of adenomas on flexible sigmoidoscopy predict advanced lesions on baseline colonoscopy ? Gastroenterology 106: 1501–4

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Kadakia SC, Wrobleski CS, Kadakia AS, Meier NJ (1996) Prevalence of proximal colonic polyps in average-risk asymptomatic patients with negative fecal occult blood tests and flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 44: 112–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Read TE, Read JD, Butterly LF (1997) Importance of colonic adenomas 5 mm or less in diameter that are detected by sigmoidoscopy. N Engl J Med 336: 8–12

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Wallace MB, Kemp JA, Trnka YM et al. (1998) Is colonoscopy indicated for small adenomas found by screening flexible sigmoidoscopy? Ann Intern Med 129:273–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Sciallero S, Costantini M, Bertinelli E et al. (1997) Distal hyperplastic polyps do not predict proximal adenomas: results from a multicentric study of colorectal adenomas. Gastrointest Endosc 46: 124–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Schoen RE, Corle D, Cranston L et al. (1998) Is colonoscopy needed for the nonadvanced adenoma found on sigmoidoscopy? The Polyp Prevention Trial. Gastroenterology 115: 533–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  78. Levin TR, Palitz A, Grossman S et al. (1999) Predicting advanced proximal colonic neoplasia with screening sigmoidoscopy. JAMA 281: 1611–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Bond JH et al. for Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group 380. (2000) Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for CRC. N Engl J Med 343: 162–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Hammer K, Hammer J, Oesterreicher C, Pötzi R (2000) Advanced distal colonic lesions as predictors of advanced lesions in the proximal colon. Medicine 79:127–34

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  81. Ikeda Y, Mori M, Miyazaki M et al. (2000) Significance of small distal adenoma for detection of proximal neoplasms in the colorectum. Gastrointest Endosc 52:358–61

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Gondal G, Grotmol T, Hofstad B et al. (2003) Grading of distal colorectal adenomas as predictors for proximal colonic neoplasia and choice of endoscope in population screening: experience from the Norwegian CRC Prevention Study. Gut 52: 398–403

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  83. Pinsky PF, Schoen RE, WeisRSSeld JL et al. (2003) Predictors of advanced proximal neoplasia in persons with abnormal screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 1:103–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Betes M, Munoz-Navas MA, Duque JM et al. (2004) Diagnostic value of distal colonic polyps for prediction of advanced proximal neoplasia in an average-risk population undergoing screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 59: 634–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Lewis JD, Ng K, Hung KE et al. (2003) Detection of proximal adenomatous polyps with screening sigmoidoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of screening colonoscopy. Arch Intern Med 163: 413–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Imperiale TF, Wagner DR, Lin CY (2003) Using risk for advanced proximal colonic neoplasia to tailor endoscopic screening for CRC. Ann Intern Med 139: 959–65

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Anderson JC, Alpern Z, Messina CR et al. (2004) Predictors of proximal neoplasia in patients without adenomatous pathology. Am J Gastroenterol 111: 472–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Schoenfeld P, Shad J, Ormsteth E et al. (2003) Predictive value of diminutive colonic adenoma trial: the PREDICT trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 1: 195–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Rex DK, Cutler CS, Lemmel GT et al. (1997) Colonoscopic miss rates of adenomas determined by back-to-back colonoscopies. Gastroenterology 112: 24–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. Rex DK, Lehman GA, Ulbright TM et al. (1994) The yield of a second screening flexible sigmoidoscopy in average-risk persons after one negative examination. Gastroenterology 106: 593–5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Hixson LS, Fennerty MB, Sampliner RE et al. (1990) Prospective study of the frequency and size distribution of polyps missed by colonoscopy. J Natl Cancer Inst 82: 1769–72

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  92. Atkin WS, Hart A, Edwards R et al. (1998) Uptake, yield of neoplasia, and adverse effects of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening. Gut 42: 560–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Martinez ME, McPherson RS, Levin B, Glober GA (1997) A case-control study of dietary intake and other lifestyle risk factors for hyperplastic polyps. Gastroenterology 113: 423–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Van Stolk RU, Beck GJ, Baron JA et al. (1998) Adenoma characteristics at first colonoscopy as predictors of adenoma recurrence and characteristics at follow-up. The Polyp Prevention Study Group. Gastroenterology 115: 13–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Noshirwani KC, van Stolk RU, Rybicki LA, Beck GJ (2000) Adenoma size and number are predictive of adenoma recurrence: implications for surveillance colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 51: 433–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Gandhi SK, Reynolds MW, Boyer JG, Goldstein JL (2001) Recurrence and malignancy rates in a benign colorectal neoplasm patient cohort: results of a 5-year analysis in a managed care environment. Am J Gastroenterol 96: 2761–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  97. Riff ER, Dehaan K, Garewal GS (1990) The role of sigmoidoscopy for asymptomatic patients. Results of three annual screening sigmoidoscopies, polypectomy, and subsequent surveillance colonoscopy in a primary-care setting. Clev Clin J Med 57: 131–6

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  98. Krevsky B, Fisher RS (1994) Yield of rescreening for colonic polyps using flexible sigmoidoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 89: 1165–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. Squillace S, Berggreen P, Jaffe P et al. (1994) A normal initial colonoscopy after age 50 does not predict a polyp-free status for life. Am J Gastroenterol 89:1156–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. Neugut AI, Jacobson JS, Ahsan H et al. (1995) Incidence and recurrence rates of colorectal adenomas: a prospective study. Gastroenterology 108: 402–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  101. Rex DK, Cummings OW, Helper DJ et al. (1996) 5-year incidence of adenomas after negative colonoscopy in asymptomatic average-risk persons. Gastroenterology 111: 1178–81

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. Doria-Rose VP, Levin TR, Selby JV et al. (2004) The incidence of CRC following a negative screening sigmoidoscopy: implications for screening interval. Gastroenterology 127: 714–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Lieberman DA, Weiss D (2004) 5-year surveillance of patients with adenomas or CRC at screening colonoscopy: results from the VA cooperative study. Digestive Disease Week and the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Gastroenterological Association — New Orleans, May 15–20, 2004 In: Gastroenterology 126: A22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. Yamaji Y, Mitsushima T, Ikuma H et al. (2004) Incidence and recurrence rates of colorectal adenomas estimated by annually repeated colonoscopies on asymptomatic Japanese. Gut 53: 568–72

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Platell CFE, Phillpott G, Olynyk JK (2002) Flexible sigmoidoscopy screening for colorectal neoplasia in average-risk people: evaluation of a five year rescreening interval. Med J Aust 176: 371–3

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Waye JD, Kahn O, Auerbach ME (1996) Complications of colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 6: 343–77

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  107. Anderson ML, Pasha TM, Leighton JA (2000) Endoscopic perforation of the colon: lessons from a 10-year study. Am J Gastroenterol 95: 3418–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  108. Nelson DB, McQuaid KR, Bond JH et al. (2002) Procedural success and complications of large-scale screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 55: 307–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  109. Levin TR, Conell C, Shapiro JA et al. (2002) Complications of screening flexible sigmoidoscopy. Gastroenterology 123: 1786–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Ringel Y, Dalton CB, Brandt LJ et al. (2002) Flexible sigmoidoscopy: the patients’ perception. Gastrointest Endosc 55: 315–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Salkeld G, Solomon M, Short L et al. (2003) Evidence-based consumer choice: a case study in CRC screening. Aust N Z J Public Health 27: 449–55

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Faivre J, Dancourt V, Lejeune C et al. (2004) Reduction in CRC mortality by fecal occult blood screening in a french controlled study. Gastroenterology 126:1674–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J et al. (1996) Randomized study of screening for CRC with fæcal-occult-blood test. Lancet 348: 1467–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  114. Mandel JS, Church TR, Bond JH et al. (2000) The effect of fecal occult-blood screening on the incidence of CRC. N Engl J Med 343: 1603–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I et al. (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349: 2191–200

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  116. Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau BC et al. (2004) Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA 291: 1713–19.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  117. Scott RG, Edwards JT, Fritschi L et al. (2004) Community-based screening by colonoscopy or computed tomographic colonography in asymptomatic average-risk patient. Am J Gastroenterol 109: 1145–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Bonithon-Kopp C, Milan C, Pariente EA et al. (2002) Facteurs influençant l’acceptabilité de la coloscopie chez les apparentés du premier degré de patients atteints d’un gros adénome. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 26: A48

    Google Scholar 

  119. Schoen RE, WeisRSSeld JL, Trauth JM et al. (2002) A population-based, community estimate of total colon examination: the impact on compliance with screening for CRC. Am J Gastroenterol 97: 446–51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Pignone M, Bucholtz D, Harris R (1999) Patient preferences for colon cancer screening. J Gen Intern Med 14: 432–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  121. Brenes GA, Paskett ED. (2000) Predictors of stage of adoption for CRC screening. Preventive Med 31: 410–6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  122. Farraye FA, Wong M, Hurwitz S et al. (2004) Barriers to endoscopic CRC screening: are women different from men? Am J Gastroenterol 110: 342–9

    Google Scholar 

  123. Turner BJ, Weiner M, Yang C, Tenhave T (2004) Predicting adherence to colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy on the basis of physician appointment-keeping behaviour. Ann Intern Med 140: 528–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Brown ML, Klabunde CN, Mysliwiec P (2003) Current capacity for endoscopic CRC screening in the United States: data from the National Cancer Institute survey of CRC screening practices. Am J Med 115: 129–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Rex DK, Liberman DA (2001) Feasability of colonoscopy screening: Discussion of issues and recommendations regarding implementation. Gastrointest Endosc 54: 662–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  126. Thiis-Evensen E, Seip B, Vatn MH, Hoff GS (2005) Population-based colonoscopic screening for colorectal cancer-impact on later need for non-screening distal gastrointestinal endoscopies. Gut 54: A49

    Google Scholar 

  127. Hur C, Gazelle GS, Zalis ME, Podolsky DK (2004) An analysis of the potential impact of computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy) on colonoscopy demand. Gastroenterology 127: 1312–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Ladabaum U, Song K (2005) Projected national impact of colorectal cancer screening on clinical and economic outcomes and health services demand. Gastroenterology 129: 1151–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Ladabaum U, Song K, Fendrick M (2004) Colorectal neoplasia screening with virtual colonoscopy: when, at what cost, and with what national impact? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2: 554–63

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Vijan S, Inadomi J, Hayward RA et al. (2004) Projections of demand and capacity for colonoscopy related to increasing rates of colorectal cancer screening in the United States. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 20: 507–15

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  131. Lieberman DA, Holub J, Eisen G et al. (2005) Utilization of colonoscopy in the United States: results from a national consortium. Gastrointest Endosc 62: 875–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  132. Canard JM, Debette-Gratien M, Dumas R et al. (2005) A prospective national study on colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy in 2000 in France. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 29: 17–22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. Levin TR, Farraye FA Schoen RE et al. (2005) Quality in the technical performance of screening flexible sigmoidoscopy: recommendations of an international multi-society task group. Gut 54: 807–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  134. Schoenfeld P, Lipscomb S, Crook J et al. (1999) Accuracy of polyp detection by gastroenterologists and nurse endoscopists during flexible sigmoidoscopy: a randomized trial. Gastroenterology 117: 312–8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  135. ANAES (Agence nationale d’accréditation et de l’évaluation scientifique) (2001) Place de la coloscopie virtuelle dans le dépistage du cancer colorectal. www.anaes.fr

    Google Scholar 

  136. Sosna J, Morrin MM, Kruskal JB et al. (2003) CT colonography of colorectal polyps: a metanalysis. Am J Roentgenol 181: 1593–8

    Google Scholar 

  137. Mulhall BP, Veerappan GR, Jackson JL (2005) Meta-analysis: computed tomographic colonography. Ann Intern Med 142: 635–50

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Layec S, Branger B, Juhel C et al. (2006) Résultat de la coloscopie virtuelle: intérêt et limites des métaanalyses en vue d’une amélioration de la pratique clinique. Gastroenterol Clin biol (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  139. Johnson CD, Toledano AY, Herman BA et al. for the American College of Radiology Imaging Network A6656 (2003) Computerized tomographic colonography: performance evaluation in a retrospective multicenter setting. Gastroenterology 125: 688–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  140. Pineau BC, Paskett ED, Chen J et al. (2003) Virtual colonoscopy using oral contrast compared with colonoscopy for detection of patients with colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 125: 304–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. Macari M, Bini EJ, Jacobs SL et al. (2004) Colorectal polyps and cancers in asymptomatic average risk patients: evaluation with CT colonography. Radiology 230: 629–36

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Vogt C, Cohen M, Beck et al. (2004) Detection of colorectal polyps by multislice CT colongraphy with ultra-low-dose technique: comparison with highresolution videocolonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 60: 201–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. Rex DK, Vining D, Kopecky KK (1999) An initial experience with screening for colon polyps using spiral CT with and without CT colography (virtual colonoscopy). Gastrointest Endosc 50: 309–13

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  144. Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C et al. (2004) Detection of colorectal lesions: lower-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 229: 775–811

    Google Scholar 

  145. Rockey DC, Paulson E, Niedzwiecki D et al. (2005) Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomograhic colonography and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet 365: 305–11

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  146. Edwards JT, Mendelson RM, Fritschi L et al. (2004) Colorectal neoplasia screening with CT colonography in average-risk asymptomatic subjects: community-based study. Radiology 230: 459–64

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  147. Gryspeerdt SS, Herman MJ, Baekelandt MA et al. (2004) Supine/left decubitus scanning: a valuable alternative to supine/prone scanning in CT colonography. Eur Radiol 14: 768–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  148. Callstrom MR, Johnson CD, Fletcher JG et al. (2001) CT colonography without cathartic preparation: feasibility study. Radiology 219: 693–8

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  149. Bielen D, Thomeer M, Vanbeckevoort D et al. (2003) Dry preparation for virtual CT colonography with fecal tagging using water-soluble contrast medium: initial results. Eur Radiol 13: 453–8

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  150. Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalono C et al. (2004) Computed tomographic colonography without cathartic preparation for the detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 127: 1300–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  151. Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S, Baekelandt M et al. (2004) Laxative-free CT colonography. Am J Roentgenol 183: 945–8

    Google Scholar 

  152. Taylor SA, Halligan S, Saunders BP et al. (2003) Acceptance by patients of multidetector CT colonography compared with barium enema examinations, flexible sigmoidoscopy, and colonoscopy. Am J Roentgenol 181: 913–21

    Google Scholar 

  153. Svensson, MH, Svensson E, Lasson A, Hellstrom M (2002) Patient acceptance of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy: prospective comparative study in patients with or suspected of having colorectal disease. Radiology 222: 337–45

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  154. Ristvedt SL, McFarland EG, Weinstock LB, Thyssen EP (2003) Patient preferences for CT colonography, conventional colonoscopy, and bowel preparation. Am J Gastroenterol 98: 578–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  155. Van Gelder RE, Bimie E, Florie J et al. (2004) CT colonography and colonoscopy: assessment of patient preference in a 5-week follow-up study. Radiology 233: 328–37

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  156. Brenner DJ, Georgsson MA (2005) Mass screening with CT colonography: should the radiation exposure be of concern? Gastroenterology 129: 328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  157. Dachman, AH, Kuniyoshi JK, Boyle CM et al. (1998) CT colonography with three-dimensional problem solving for detection of colonic polyps. Am J Roentgenol 171: 989–95

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  158. Hara AK, Johnson CD, Reed HE et al. (1997) Detection of colorectal polyps with CT colography: initial assessment of sensitivity and specificity. Radiology 205: 59–65

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  159. Pescatore P, Glucker T, Delarive J et al. (2000) Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver agreement of CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy). Gut 47: 126–30

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  160. McFarland EG, Pilgram TK, Brink JA et al. (2002) CT colonography: multiobserver diagnostic performance. Radiology 225: 380–90

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  161. Van Gelder RE, Venema HW, Florie J et al. (2004) CT colonography: feasibility of substantial dose reduction-comparison of medium to very low doses in identical patients. Radiology 232: 611–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  162. Van Gelder RE, Nio CY, Florie J et al. (2004) Computed tomographic colonography compared with colonoscopy in patients at increased risk for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 127: 41–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  163. Johnson, CD, AY Toledano, Herman BA et al. (2003) Prospective evaluation of CT colonography for screen detection of colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology 125: 311–19

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  164. Lefere PA, Gryspeerdt SS, Dewyspelaere J et al. (2002) Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: initial results polyp detection and patient acceptance. Radiology 224: 393–403

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  165. Macari M, Bini EJ, Jacobs SL et al. (2004) Significance of missed polyps at CT colonography. Am J Roentgenol 183: 127–34

    Google Scholar 

  166. Pickhardt PJ, Choi, JR, Hwany I, Schindler WR (2004) Nonadenomatous polyps at CT colonography: prevalence, size distribution, and detection rates. Radiology 232: 784–90

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  167. Gluecker TM, Fletcher JG, Welch TJ et al. (2004) Characterization of lesions missed on interpretation of CT colonography using a 2D search method. Am J Roentgenol 182: 881–9

    Google Scholar 

  168. Mani A, Napel S, Paik DS et al. (2004) Computed tomography colonography: feasibility of computer-aided polyp detection in a “first reader” paradigm. J Comput Assist Tomogr 28: 318–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  169. Pickhardt PJ (2003) Three-dimensional endoluminal CT colonography (virtual colonoscopy): comparison of three commercially available systems. Am J Roentgenol 181: 1599–606

    Google Scholar 

  170. Pickhardt PJ (2004) Translucency rendering in 3D endoluminal CT colonography: a useful tool for increasing polyp specificity and dessais contrôlés randomiséseasing interpretation time. Am J Roentgenol 183: 429–36

    Google Scholar 

  171. Summers, R M, Franaszek M, Miller TT et al. (2005) Computer-aided detection of polyps on oral contrast-enhanced CT colonography. Am J Roentgenol 184: 105–8

    Google Scholar 

  172. Summers RM, Johnson CD, Pusanik LM et al. (2001) Automated polyp detection at CT colonography: feasibility assessment in a human population. Radiology 219: 51–9

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  173. Vos FM, van Gelder RE, Serlie IW et al. (2003) Three-dimensional display modes for CT colonography: conventional 3D virtual colonoscopy versus unfolded cube projection. Radiology 228: 878–85

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  174. Yoshida H, Masutani Y, MacEneaney P et al. (2002) Computerized detection of colonic polyps at CT colonography on the basis of volumetric features: pilot study. Radiology 222: 327–36

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  175. Yoshida H, Nappi J (2001) Three-dimensional computer-aided diagnosis scheme for detection of colonic polyps. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 20: 1261–74

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  176. Kiss G, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Thomeer M et al. (2002) Computer-aided diagnosis in virtual colonography via combination of surface normal and sphere fitting methods. Eur Radiol 12: 77–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  177. Summers RM, Yao J, Pickhardt PJ et al. (2005) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy computer-aided polyp detection in a screening population. Gastroenterology 129: 1832–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  178. Yee J, Kumar NN, Godara S et al. (2005) Extracolonic abnormalities discovered incidentally at CT colonography in a male population. Radiology 236: 519–26

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  179. Chin M, Mendelson R, Edwards J et al. (2005) Computed tomographic colonography: prevalence, nature, and clinical significance of extracolonic findings in a community screening program. Am J Gastroenterol 100: 2771–6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  180. Thorpe LE, Mostashari F, Hajat A et al. (2005) Colon cancer screening practices in New York City, 2003: results of a large random-digit dialed telephone survey. Cancer 104: 1075–82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Service des maladies de l’appareil digestif, CHU Pontchaillou, 2, rue Henri-le-Guilloux, 35033, Rennes, France

    D. Heresbach & J. -F. Bretagne

Authors
  1. D. Heresbach
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. -F. Bretagne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag France, Paris

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heresbach, D., Bretagne, J.F. (2006). Dépistage du cancer colorectal par endoscopie classique ou coloscopie virtuelle. In: Le dépistage du cancer colorectal. Dépistage et cancer. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/2-287-32803-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/2-287-32803-3_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-287-32802-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-287-32803-9

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation