Advertisement

Functional Capacity Evaluation (FCE)

  • M. Oliveri
Part of the Collection de L’Académie Européenne de Médecine de Réadaptation book series (LACADEMIE)

Keywords

Vocational Rehabilitation Test Person Physical Capacity Functional Capacity Evaluation Pile Test 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hadler NM (1995) The disabling backache. An international perspective. Spine 20: 640–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    WHO (2003) ICF [International Classification of Function]. Funktionsfähigkeit, Behinderung und Gesundheit (Bearbeitung: Deutsches Institut für Medizinische Dokumentation und Information). Verband Deutscher Rentenversicherungsträger (www.dimdi.de → Klassifikationen → ICF)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Innes E, Straker L (1999a) Reliability of work-related assessments. Work 13: 107–24PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Innes E, Straker L (1999b) Validity of work-related assessments. Work 13: 125–52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    King PM, Tuckwell N, Barrett TE (1998) A critical review of functional capacity evaluations. Physical Therapy 78: 852–66PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hart DL, Isernhagen SJ, Matheson LN (1993) Guidelines for functional capacity evaluation of people with medical conditions. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 18: 682–6PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Snook SH, Irvine CH (1969) Psychophysical studies of physiological fatigue criteria. Hum Factors 11: 291–300PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kopp HG, Oliveri M, Thali A (1997) Erfassung und Umgang mit Symptomausweitung. Medizinische Mitteilungen der Suva 70: 56–78Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Matheson LN (1988) Symptom Magnification Syndrome. In: Work Injury: Management and Prevention. (Ed. Isernhagen SJ). Gaithersburg, Maryland, Aspen p 257–82Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Oliveri M, Kopp HG, Läubli T (1993) Die Bedeutung von körperlicher Aktivität und physischer Leistungsfähigkeit für die Prävention und Behandlung chronischer Rückenbeschwerden. Forschungsprojekt des Schweizerischen Nationalfondsprogramms NFP/26B. Wissenschaftlicher SchlussberichtGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Isernhagen SJ (1988) Functional Capacity Evaluation. In: Work injury: Management And Prevention. (Ed. Isernhagen SJ). Gaithersburg, Aspen p 139–91Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Isernhagen SJ, Hart DL, Matheson LN (1999) Reliability of independent observer judgments of level of lift effort in a kinesiophysical Functional Capacity Evaluation. Work 12: 145–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    US Department of Labor (1986) Dictionary of Occupational Titles. 4th, revised. Washington DC, Employment and Training AdministrationGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Isernhagen SJ (1995) Contemporary Issues in Functional Capacity Evaluation. In: The Comprehensive Guide To Work Injury Management. (Ed. Isernhagen SJ). Gaithersburg, Maryland, Aspen p 410–29Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reneman MF, Dijkstra PU, Westmaas M et al. (2002a) Test-retest reliability of lifting and carrying in a 2-day functional capacity evaluation. J Occup Rehabil 12: 269–75PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mayer TG, Barnes D, Kishino ND et al. (1988a) Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation I. A Standardized Protocol and Normative Database. Spine 13: 993–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kaiser H, Kersting M (2000) Der Stellenwert des Arbeitssimulationsgerätes ERGOS als Bestandteil der leistungsdiagnostischen Begutachtung. Rehabilitation 39: 175–84PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mayer TG, Barnes D, Nichols G et al. (1988b) Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation II. A Comparison with Isokinetic Lifting in a Disabled Chronic Low-Back Pain Industrial Population. Spine 13: 998–1002PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mayer TG, Gatchel R, Barnes D et al. (1990) Progressive Isoinertial Lifting Evaluation. Erratum Notice. Spine 15: 5Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Laurig W (1992) Wie lassen sich Belastung und Beanspruchung ermitteln? In: Grundzüge der Ergonomie, Erkenntnisse und Prinzipien. (Ed. Laurig W). Berlin, Beuth p 104–106Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ahonen M, Launis M, Kuorinka T (1989) [Ergonomic Workplace Analysis] Ergonomische Arbeitsplatzabklärung (Kursmanual: Schweizer Bearbeitung durch Huwiler Hj; Hallmark Itty ML; Klipstein A). [[Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Ergonomic Section] Schweizerische Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Rehabilitation SAR, Interessengemeinschaft Ergonomie, 2. Auflage 2000 (www.sar-rehab.ch → Who is who → Interessengemeinschaften → IG Ergonomie)]Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Matheson LN, Matheson ML, Grant J (1993) Development of a Measure of Perceived Functional Ability. J Occup Rehabil 3: 15–29Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Matheson LN, Matheson ML (1996) Spinal Function Sort (PACT-Test, edited in different languages). Swiss Association for Rehabilitation SAR, Working group Ergonomics (www.sar-rehab.ch → Who is who → Interessengemeinschaften → IG Ergonomie)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Matheson LN, Bohr PC, Hart D (1998) Use of maximum voluntary effort grip strength testing to identify symptom magnification syndrome in persons with low back pain. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation 10: 125–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Mayer TG, Gatchel RJ (1988) Functional Restoration for Spinal Disorders: The Sports Medicine Approach. Philadelphia, Lea & Febiger, p 1–321Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Waddell G (1998) The Back Pain Revolution. Churchill Livingstone, p 223–40Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Main CJ, Spanswick CC (2000) Pain Management. An Interdisciplinary Approach. Churchill LivingstoneGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Matheson LN (1991) Symptom Magnification Syndrome Structured; Interview: Rationale and Procedure. J Occup Rehabil 1: 43–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kendall NAS., Linton SJ, Main CJ (2004) Guide to assessing psychsocial yellow flags in acute low back pain: risk factors for long term disability and work loss. Wellington (N Z), Accident rehabilitation and Compensation Insurance Corporation of New Zealand and the National Health Committee [www.nzgg.org.nz → guidelines → musculoskeletal disease]Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hazard RG, Reeves V, Fenwick JW (1992) Lifting capacity. Indices of subject effort. Spine 17: 1065–70PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Colledge AL, Holmes AB, Soo Hoo ER et al. (2001) Motivation Determination (Sincerity of Effort): The Performance APGAR Model. Disability Medicine (American Board of Indepent Medical Examiners) 1: 5–18Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fishbain DA, Cutler R, Rosomoff HL et al. (1999) Chronic pain disability exaggeration/malingering and submaximal effort research. Clin J Pain 15: 244–74PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hopf HC, Deuschl G (2000) Psychogene Störungen der Motorik, Sensibililtät und Sensorik aus der Sicht des Neurologen — “bed-side” — Befunde bei somatoformen Störungen. Akt Neurol 27: 145–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kool J, Oesch P, de Bie RA (2002) Predictive tests for non-return to work in patients with chronic low back pain. Euro Spine J 11: 258–66Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Smith RL (1994) Therapists’ ability to identify safe maximum lifting in low back pain patients during functional capacity evaluation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 19: 277–81PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Gross DP, Battie MC (2002) Reliability of safe maximum lifting determinations of a functional capacity evaluation. Phys Ther 82: 364–71PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Reneman MF, Joling CI, Soer EL et al. (2001b) Functional capacity evaluation: Ecological validity of three static endurance tests. Work 16: 227–34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Brouwer S, Reneman M F, Dijkstra PU et al. (2000) Test-retest reliability of the Isernhagen Work Systems Functional Capacity Evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain. J Occup Rehabil 13: 207–18Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Matheson LN, Isernhagen SJ, Hart DL (2002) Relationships among lifting ability, grip force, and return to work. Phys Ther 82: 249–56PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Smith SL, Cunningham S, Weinberg R (1986) The predictive validity of the functional capacities evaluation. Am J Occup Ther 40: 564–7PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lechner DE, Jackson JR, Roth DL et al. (1994) Reliability and Validity of a Newly Developed Test of Physical Work Performance. JOM 36: 997–1004PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Reneman MF, Bults MM, Engbers LH et al. (2001a) Measuring maximum holding times and perception of static elevated work and forward bending in healthy young adults. J Occup Rehabil 11: 87–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Dusik LA, Menard MR, Cooke C et al. (1993) Concurrent validity of the ERGOS work simulator versus conventional functional capacity evaluation techniques in a worker’s compensation population. J Occup Med 35: 759–67PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Gross DP, Michele C (2003) Construct Validity of a Kinesiophysical Functional Capacity Evaluation Administered Within a Worker’s Compensation Environment. J Occup Rehabil 13: 287–95PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Reneman MF, Jorritsma W, Schellekens JM et al. (2002b) Concurrent validity of questionnaire and performance-based disability measurements in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. J Occup Rehabil 12: 119–29PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Gross DP, Battié MC, Cassidy D (2004) The prognostic value for functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain: Part 1: Timely return to work. Spine 29: 914–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Gross DP, Battié MC (2004) The prognostic value for functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain: Part 2: Sustained recovery. Spine 29: 920–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Oliveri M, Oesch P, Kool J et al. (2005) Letter to the editor (Re: Gross et al. The prognostic value for functional capacity evaluation…). Spine 30: 1232–33PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Saunders RL, Beissner KL, McManis BG (1997) Estimates of weight that subjects can lift frequently in functional capacity evaluations. Phys Ther 77: 1717–28PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Gibson L, Strong J (1996) The Reliability and Validity of a Measure of Perceived Functional Capacity for Work in Chronic Back Pain. J Occup Rehabil 6: 159–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Elsevier Gmblt, Urban & Fischer Verlag München 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Oliveri
    • 1
  1. 1.Unit of Occupational Rehabilitation and ErgonomicsRehaklinik BellikonBellikonSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations