Vocational rehabilitation

  • C. Gobelet
  • F. Franchignoni
Part of the Collection de L’Académie Européenne de Médecine de Réadaptation book series (LACADEMIE)


European Union Sick Leave Sickness Absence Disability Pension Disable People 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Waddell G, Norlund AI (2000) Review of Social Security. In: Nachemson A and Jonsson E (eds). Neck and Back Pain: The scientific evidence of causes, diagnosis and treatment. JB Lippincott: Philadelphia, p427–71Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ekberg K, Wildhagen I (1996) Long-term sickness absence due to musculoskeletal disorders: the necessary intervention of work conditions. Scand J Rehab Med 28: 39–47Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burri M (2002) Statistiques de la Sécurité Sociale. Statistiques de l’AI 2002. Office Fédéral des Assurances Sociales (OFAS), p2–40Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bonfiglio RP, LaBan MM, Taylor RS et al. (1993) Industrial Rehabilitation Medicine management. In: DeLisa ed. Rehabilitation Medicine. Principles and Practice. JB Lippincott: Philadelphia, p169–77Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Engström LG, Eriksen T (2002) Can difference in benefit levels explain duration and outcome of sickness absence? Disabil Rehabil 24(14): 713–18PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    World Health Organization (2001) International Classification of functioning, disability and health. WHO Library: GenevaGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Malo MA, Garcia-Serrano The employment situation of people with disabilities in the European Union (2001) Social security and social integration. Employment and Social Affairs. European Communities. EIM Business and Policy Research. Directorate-General Unit EMPL/E.4 p.35 (www.employment-disability.net)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yelin E (1989) Displaced concern: the social context of the work-disability problem. Milbank Q 67(suppl2): 114–65PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Walker A, Townsend P (eds) (1981) Disability in Britain a manifest of rights. Martin Robertson: Oxford.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schmidt SH, Oort-Marburger D, Meijman TF (1995) Employment after rehabilitation for musculoskeletal impairments: The impact of vocational rehabilitation and working on a trial basis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 76: 950–4PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    British Society of Rehabilitation Medicine (2000) Vocational Rehabilitation-the way forward: report of a working party. BSRM: LondonGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gjesdal S, Bratberg E (2002) The role of gender in long-term sickness absence and transition to permanent disability benefits. Results from a multiregister based, prospective study in Norway 1990–1995. Eur J Public Health 12(3): 180–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Blondal S, Scarpetta S (1999) Early retirement in OECD countries: the role of social security systems. OECD Economic Studies No. 29, 1997/II, p7–54Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nachemson A (1999) Back pain and causes, diagnosis and treatment updated in 1999. Sweden, SBU. Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care 108: 1–5Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Petrusov E. Le rôle du travail comme facteur d’intégration (2000). http://www.acgrenoble.fr/webcurie/pedagogie/scienceseconomiquesetsociales/cours/Tem/intra/cours/changemsolida/travailintegr/coursw.htmlGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Warr PB (1982) Psychological aspects of employment and unemployment. Psychol Med 96(2): 43–47Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Charte d’Ottawa pour la promotion de la santé (1986). OMS, p1–2Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    International Labour Organization (1998) Vocational rehabilitation and employment of disabled persons. International Labour Conference, 86th Session. ILO: Geneva.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Selander J (1999) Unemployed sick-leavers and vocational rehabilitation. A person level study based on a national social insurance material. Dissertation from the Department of Rehabilitation Medicine. Karolinska Institute. Stockholm, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Marnetoft SU, Selander J, Bergroth A, Ekholm J (2001) Factors associated with successfull vocational rehabilitation in a Swedish rural area. J Rehabil Med 33: 71–8PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Selander J, Marnetoft SU, Bergroth A, Ekholm J (2002) Return to work following vocational rehabilitation for neck, back and shoulder problems: risk factors reviewed. Disabil Rehabil 24(14): 704–12. Taylor and Francis Ltd. http://www.tandf.co.uk/journalsPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    EU anti-discrimination directives (02.12.2000) Council Decision of 27 November 2000 establishing a community action program to combat discrimination (2001 to 2006) (2000/750/EC). Official Journal of the European Communities L 303/23–38Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Europa. European Commission. Employment and Social Affairs. Disability issues. The European Union Disability Strategy. http://europa.eu.int/comm/employmentsocial/disability/strategyen.htmlGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Europa. European Commission. Employment and Social Affairs. Social Inclusion. http://europa.eu.int/comm/employmentsocial/indexen.htmlGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    EQUAL (May 5th 2000) Guidelines http://europa.eu.int/comm/employmentsocial/equal/indexen.htmlGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yelin E (1986) The myth of malingering: why individuals withdraw from work in the presence of illness. Milbank Q 64: 622–49PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Natvig K (1983) Social, occupational and personal factors related to vocational rehabilitation. Otolaryngol 12: 370–6Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Niemeyer LO, Jacobs K, Reynolds-Lynch K et al. (1994) Work hardening: past, present, and future-the work programs special interest section national work-hardening outcome study. Am J Occup Ther 48(4): 327–39PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tellness G, Bruusgaard D, Sandvik L (1990) Occupational factors in sickness certification. Scand J Prim Health Care 8: 37–44Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Durand MJ, Loisel P (2001) Therapeutic return to work: rehabilitation in the workplace. Work 17(1): 57–63PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Melin F, Fugl-Meyer AR (2003) On prediction of vocational rehabilitation outcome at a Swedish employability institute. J Rehabil Med 35: 284–9PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Voaklander DC, Beaulne AP, Lessard RA (1995) Factors related to outcome following a work hardening program. J Occup Rehabil 5(2): 71–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Durand MJ, Loisel P, Hong Qn et al. (2002) Helping clinicians in work disability prevention: the work disability diagnosis interview. J Occup Rehabil 12(3): 191–204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rondinelli RD, Robinson JP, Scheer SJ et al. (1997) Industrial rehabilitation medicine. 4. Strategies for disability management. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 78(3 suppl): 21–8. ReviewGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Eklund M, Eriksson S, Fugl-Meyer AR (1991) Vocational rehabilitation in northern Sweden. II. Some psycho-socio-demographic predictors. Scand J Rehabil Med 23(2): 73–82PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    International Social Security Association Research Programme (2002) Who returns to work and why? — A summary. ISSA: Geneva, p11Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Association of British Insurers / Trades Union Congress (2002) Getting back to work. A rehabilitation discussion paper. TUC: LondonGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    James P, Cunningham I, Dibben P (2003) Job retention and vocational rehabilitation: the development and evaluation of a conceptual framework. Research report 106 — Middlesex University Business School and the University of Strathclyde for the Health and Safety Executive. HSE Books: Sudbury (UK)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Dean DH, Dolan RC, Schmidt RM (1999) Evaluating the vocational rehabilitation program using longitudinal data. Evidence for a quasi experimental research design. Eval Rev 23(2):162–89PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Elders LA, Van der Beck AJ, Burdorf A (2000) Return to work after sickness absence due to back disorders: a systematic review on intervention strategies. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 73: 339–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Linz DH, Shepherd CD, Ford LF et al. (2002) Effectiveness of occupational medicine center-based physical therapy. J Occup Environ Med 44(1): 48–53PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Loisel P, Lemaire J, Poitras S et al. (2002) Cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis of a disability prevention model for back pain management: a six year follow up study. Occup Environ Med 59(12): 807–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Schonstein E, Kenny DT, Keating J et al. (2003) Work conditioning, work hardening and functional restoration for work with back and neck pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1) CD001822Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Disler PB, Pallant JF (2001) Vocational Rehabilitation. BMJ 323(7305): 121–3PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Allaire SH, Li W, La Valley MP (2003) Reduction of job loss in persons with rheumatic diseases receiving vocational rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum 48(11): 3212–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kvamm J, Nielsen CV (2003) Vocational rehabilitation: a descriptive follow up study. Ugeskr Laeger 165: 2815–1819PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag France 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. Gobelet
    • 1
  • F. Franchignoni
    • 2
  1. 1.Clinique romande de réadaptation SuvaCareSionSwitzerland
  2. 2.Scientific Institute of Rehabilitation IRCCS“Salvatore Maugeri” FoundationVeruno (No)Italy

Personalised recommendations