Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Analyse critique des examens fonctionnels urogynécologiques

  • Chapter
Pelvi-périnéologie

  • 645 Accesses

Résumé

L’objectif du bilan urodynamique est de caractériser dans sa globalité la fonction urinaire des patientes. Le colpocystogramme et la colpocystodéfécographie sont particulièrement indiqués en cas de colpocèle postérieure pour démasquer une élytrocèle. L’IRM permet une évaluation statique et dynamique du plancher pelvien ainsi qu’une analyse morphologique des organes pelviens. Sa diffusion reste cependant limitée du fait de son coût et de sa réalisation en décubitus dorsal. L’échographie urétro-vésicale permet une visualisation directe des structures périurétrales, du sphincter vésical et de la base de la vessie. Elle permet d’évaluer la mobilité du col vésical et de l’urètre.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Références

  1. Haylen BT, Frazer MI, MacDonald JH (1989) Assessing the effectiveness of different urinary catheters in emptying the bladder: an application of transvaginal ultrasound. Br J Urol 64: 353–6

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Haylen BT (1989) Residual urine volumes in a normal female population: application of transvaginal ultrasound. Br J Urol 64: 347–9

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Haylen BT, Frazer MI, Sutherst JR et al. (1989) Transvaginal ultrasound in the assessment of bladder volumes in women. Preliminary report. Br J Urol 63: 149–51

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Walters MD (1989) Mechanisms of continence and voiding, with international continence society classification of dysfunction. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 16: 773–85

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Papa Petros PE, Ulmsten U (1999) An anatomical classification — a new paradigm for management of urinary dysfunction in the female. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 10: 29–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cucchi A (1990) Acceleration of flow rate as a screening test for detrusor instability in women with stress incontinence. Br J Urol 65: 17–9

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chou TP, Gorton E, Stanton SL et al. (2000) Can uroflowmetry patterns in women be reliably interpreted? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 11: 142–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaplan SA, Chancellor MB, Blaivas JG (1991) Bladder and sphincter behavior in patients with spinal cord lesions. J Urol 146: 113–7

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chancellor MB, Shenot PJ, Rivas DA et al. (1996) Urological symptomatology in patients with reflex sympathetic dystrophy. J Urol 155: 634–7

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Saxton HM (1990) Urodynamics: the appropriate modality for the investigation of frequency, urgency, incontinence, and voiding difficulties. Radiology 175: 307–16

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Haylen BT, Law MG, Frazer M et al. (1999) Urine flow rates and residual urine volumes in urogynecology patients. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 10: 378–83

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bergman A, Bhatia NN (1985) Uroflowmetry for predicting postoperative voiding difficulties in women with stress urinary incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 92: 835–8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Groutz A, Gordon D, Lessing JB et al. (1999) Prevalence and characteristics of voiding difficulties in women: are subjective symptoms substantiated by objective urodynamic data? Urology 54: 268–72

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bhatia NN, Bergman A, Karram M (1989) Changes in urethral resistance after surgery for stress urinary incontinence. Urology 34: 200–4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bhatia NN, Bergman A (1986) Use of preoperative uroflowmetry and simultaneous urethrocystometry for predicting risk of prolonged postoperative bladder drainage. Urology 28: 440–5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Weinberger MW, Ostergard DR (1996) Postoperative catheterization, urinary retention, and permanent voiding dysfunction after polytetrafluroethylene suburethral sling placement. Obstet Gynecol 87: 50–4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sze EH, Miklos JR, Karram MM (1996) Voiding after Burch colposuspension and effects of concomitant pelvic surgery: correlation with preoperative voiding mechanism. Obstet Gynecol 88: 564–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yalla SV, Blunt KJ, Fam BA et al. (1977) Detrusorurethral sphincter dyssynergia. J Urol 118: 1026–9

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Blaivas JG, Sinha HP, Zayed AA et al. (1981) Detrusor-external sphincter dyssynergia. J Urol 125: 542–4

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Blaivas JG, Sinha HP, Zayed AA et al. (1981). Detrusor-external sphincter dyssynergia: a detailed electromyographic study. J Urol 125: 545–8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Nitti VW, Raz S (1994) Obstruction following antiincontinence procedures: diagnosis and treatment with transvaginal urethrolysis. J Urol 152: 93–8

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nguyen JK (2002) Diagnosis and treatment of voiding dysfunction caused by urethral obstruction after anti-incontinence surgery. Obstet Gynecol Surv 57: 468–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nguyen JK, Glowacki CA, Bhatia NN (2001) Survey of voiding dysfunction and urinary retention after anti-incontinence procedures. Obstet Gynecol 98: 1011–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Petrou SP, Brown JA, Blaivas JG (1999) Suprameatal transvaginal urethrolysis. J Urol 161: 1268–71

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Deval B, El Houari Y, Rafii A et al. (2002) [Pubo vaginal and sub urethral slings: review]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 31: 131–43

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Deval B, Jeffry L, Al Najjar F et al. (2002) Determinants of patient dissatisfaction after a tension-free vaginal tape procedure for urinary incontinence. J Urol 167: 2093–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jarvis GJ (2000) Surgery for urinary incontinence. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 14: 315–34

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Van Waalwijk, Van Doorn E, Anders K et al. (2000) Standardisation of ambulatory urodynamic monitoring: Report of the Standardisation Sub-Committee of the International Continence Society for Ambulatory Urodynamic Studies. Neurourol Urodyn 19: 113–25

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lose G, Griffiths D, Hosker G et al. (2002) Standardisation of urethral pressure measurement: report from the Standardisation Sub-Committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 21: 258–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Staskin DR, Wein AJ, Andersson KE et al. (2002) Overview consensus statement. Urology 60: 1–6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Jabs CF, Stanton SL (2001) Urge incontinence and detrusor instability. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 12: 58–68

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mostwin JL (2002) Pathophysiology: the varieties of bladder overactivity. Urology 60: 22–6; discussion 27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Weir J, Jaques PF (1974) Large-capacity bladder. A urodynamic survey. Urology 4: 544–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Bump RC, Friedman CI (1986) Intraluminal urethral pressure measurements in the female baboon: effects of hormonal manipulation. J Urol 136: 508–11

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Blaivas JG (1982) The neurophysiology of micturition: a clinical study of 550 patients. J Urol 127: 958–63

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M et al. (2002) The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Am J Obstet Gynecol 187: 116–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hilton P, Stanton SL (1983) Urethral pressure measurement by microtransducer: the results in symptom-free women and in those with genuine stress incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 90: 919–33

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Theofrastous JP, Bump RC, Elser DM et al. (1995) Correlation of urodynamic measures of urethral resistance with clinical measures of incontinence severity in women with pure genuine stress incontinence. The Continence Program for Women Research Group. Am J Obstet Gynecol 173: 407–12; discussion 412–4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Nager CW, Schulz JA, Stanton SL et al. (2001) Correlation of urethral closure pressure, leak-point pressure and incontinence severity measures. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 12: 395–400

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Sultana CJ (1995) Urethral closure pressure and leakpoint pressure in incontinent women. Obstet Gynecol 86: 839–42

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Pajoncini C, Costantini E, Guercini F et al. (2002) Intrinsic sphincter deficiency: do the maximum urethral closure pressure and the Valsalva leak-point pressure identify different pathogenic mechanisms? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 13: 30–5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Rezapour M, Falconer C, Ulmsten U (2001) Tension-Free vaginal tape (TVT) in stress incontinent women with intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD)-a long-term follow-up. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 12Suppl 2: S12–14

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ulmsten UJ, P. Rezapour M. (1999) A three-year follow up of tension free vaginal tape for surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 106(4): 345–50

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Ulmsten U, Henriksson L, Iosif S (1982) The unstable female urethra. Am J Obstet Gynecol 144: 93–7

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Weil A, Miege B, Rottenberg R et al. (1986) Clinical significance of urethral instability. Obstet Gynecol 68: 106–10

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. McCormack M, Pike J, Kiruluta G. (1993) Leak point of incontinence: a measure of the interaction between outlet resistance and bladder capacity. J Urol 150: 162–4

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Decter RM, Harpster L (1992) Pitfalls in determination of leak point pressure. J Urol 148: 588–91

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Theofrastous JP, Cundiff GW, Harris RL et al. (1996) The effect of vesical volume on Valsalva leak-point pressures in women with genuine stress urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 87: 711–4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Nitti VW, Combs AJ (1996) Correlation of Valsalva leak point pressure with subjective degree of stress urinary incontinence in women. J Urol 155: 281–5

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Swift SE, Ostergard DR (1995) A comparison of stress leak-point pressure and maximal urethral closure pressure in patients with genuine stress incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 85: 704–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Swift SE, Ostergard DR (1995) Evaluation of current urodynamic testing methods in the diagnosis of genuine stress incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 86: 85–91

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Quadri G, Magatti F, Belloni C et al. (1999) Marshall-Marchetti-Krantz urethropexy and Burch colposuspension for stress urinary incontinence in women with low pressure and hypermobility of the urethra: early results of a prospective randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181: 12–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Petrou SP, Broderick GA (2002) Valsalva leak-point pressure changes after successful and failed suburethral sling. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 13: 299–302

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Haab F, Ciofu C, Pedron P et al. (1997) [Feasibility of «Valsalva Leak Point Pressure». Prospective study]. Prog Urol 7: 611–4

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Haab F, Dmochowski R, Zimmern P et al. (1997) The variability of the leakage pressure threshold due to exertion «the Valsalva Leak Point Pressure» as a function of the filling volume of the bladder. Prog Urol 7: 422–5

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Bethoux A, Bory S, Huguier M et al. (1965) The colpocystogram. Its application in the study of vaginal prolapse and urinary incontinence. J Chir (Paris) 90: 51–62

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Bethoux A, Bory S, Huguier M. (1965) A radiological technic of exploration of genital prolapse and urinary incontinence: the colpocystogram. Ann Radiol (Paris) 8: 809–28

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Bethoux A, Bory S, Huguier M et al. (1965) The colpocystogram. Its application in the study of vaginal prolapse and urinary incontinence. J Chir (Paris) 90: 51–62

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Kelvin F, Maglinte D. (1997) Dynamic cystoproctography of female pelvic floor defects and their interrelationships. Am J Roentgen 169: 769–74

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Mellgren A, Bremmer S, Johansson C et al. (1994) Defecography. Results of investigations in 2,816 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 37: 1133–41

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Vanbeckevoort D, Van Hoe L, Oyen R et al. (1999) Pelvic floor descent in females: comparative study of colpocystodefecography and dynamic fast MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 9: 373–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Gousse AE, Barbaric ZL, Safir MH et al. (2000) Dynamic half Fourier acquisition, single shot turbo spin-echo magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating the female pelvis. J Urol 164: 1606–13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Lienemann A, Anthuber C, Baron A (2000) Diagnosing enteroceles using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Dis Colon Rectum 43: 205–12; discussion 212–3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Weidner A, Low VH. (1998) Imaging studies of the pelvic floor. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 25: 825–48, vii

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Yang A, Mostwin JL, Rosenshein NB et al. (1991) Pelvic floor descent in women: dynamic evaluation with fast MR imaging and cinematic display. Radiology 179: 25–33

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Maubon AM-B, Juhan MP, Courtieu V et al. (2000) Static and dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the pelvic floor. J Radiol 81: 1875–86

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Singh K, Reid WM, Berger LA (2001) Assessment and grading of pelvic organ prolapse by use of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185: 71–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K et al. (1996) The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175: 10–7

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Comiter C, Vasavada VS, Barbaric ZL et al. (1999) Grading pelvic prolapse and pelvic floor relaxation using dynamic magnetic resonance imaging. Urology 54: 454–7

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Gufler H, Laubenberger J, De Gregorio G et al. (1999) Pelvic floor descent: dynamic MR imaging using a half-Fourier RARE sequence. J Magn Reson Imaging 9: 378–83

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Tunn R, Paris S, Taupitz M et al. (2000) MR imaging in posthysterectomy vaginal prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 11: 87–92

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Kelvin FM, Maglinte DD, Hale DS et al.(2000) Female pelvic organ prolapse: a comparison of triphasic dynamic MR imaging and triphasic fluoroscopic cystocolpoproctography. AJR Am J Roentgen 174: 81–8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Siproudhis L (1998) Therapeutic approaches to rectal prolapse. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 22: B134–41

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Lienemann A, Anthuber C, Baron A et al. (1997) Dynamic MR colpocystorectography assessing pelvic-floor descent. Eur Radiol 7: 1309–17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Beco J (1996) Functional sonography of the lower urinary tract. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 7: 270–3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Beco J, Sulu M, Schaaps JP et al. (1987) A new approach to urinary continence disorders in women: urodynamic ultrasonic examination by the vaginal route. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 16: 987–98

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Pregazzi R, Sartore A, Bortoli P et al. (2002) Perineal ultrasound evaluation of urethral angle and bladder neck mobility in women with stress urinary incontinence. Bjog 109: 821–7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Beco J (1995) Reducing uncertainty for vesico-urethral sonography in women. Acta Urol Belg 63: 13–29

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Beco J, Leonard D, Lambotte R (1994) Study of the artefacts induced by linear array transvaginal ultrasound scanning in urodynamics. World J Urol 12: 329–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Pregazzi R, Sartore A, Bortoli P et al. (2000) Ultrasonographic assessment of urethrovesical mobility in women. Arch Ital Urol Androl 72: 335–9

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Beco J, Mouchel J (1995) Should we still use the Burch procedure? J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 24: 772–4

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Service de gynécologie obstétrique, Hôpital Beaujon, 100, boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92110, Clichy Cedex

    A. Rafii, B. Deval & M. Levardon

  2. Service de rééducation neurologique, Hôpital Rothschild, 33, boulevard de Picpus, 75571, Paris Cedex 12

    P. Raibault

  3. Service de rééducation neurologique et d’explorations périnéales, Hôpital Rothschild, 33, boulevard de Picpus, 75571, Paris Cedex 12

    G. Amarenco

  4. Service de radiologie, Hôpital Beaujon, 100, boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92110, Clichy Cedex

    M.-P. Vulierme

  5. Service de gynécologie obstétrique, Hôpital de la Conception, 147, boulevard Baille, 13385, Marseille Cedex 5

    B. Blanc

Authors
  1. A. Rafii
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. B. Deval
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Levardon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. P. Raibault
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. G. Amarenco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. J. Juras
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. M.-P. Vulierme
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. B. Blanc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag France

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rafii, A. et al. (2005). Analyse critique des examens fonctionnels urogynécologiques. In: Pelvi-périnéologie. Springer, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1007/2-287-27807-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/2-287-27807-9_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Paris

  • Print ISBN: 978-2-287-00501-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-2-287-27807-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation