Uterus: Normal Findings

  • Athina C. TsiliEmail author
Part of the Medical Radiology book series (MEDRAD)


Radiologists should be familiar with the normal appearances of the uterus on CT and MRI when interpreting uterine pathologies. Although CT is not generally recommended as the first-line imaging modality for the assessment of uterine diseases, it is often used for the initial evaluation of patients referred to the emergency settings. Multidetector CT with multiplanar reformations allows improved visualization of the normal anatomy of the uterus. MRI is a superb modality for evaluation of the normal uterus. Uterine and cervical zonal anatomy is nicely displayed on T2WI. The zonal appearance of the uterine corpus changes significantly in response to a variety of physiological stimuli, including menstrual phase, age and hormonal effects. Functional imaging techniques including dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging enable the radiologist to move from morphological to functional assessment of the normal uterus.


  1. Basmajian JV (1971) Grant’s method of anatomy. The Williams & Wilkins Co, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  2. Brosens JJ, de Souza NM, Barker FG (1995) Uterine junctional zone: function and disease. Lancet 26:558–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown HK, Stoll BS, Nicosia SV, Fiorica JV, Hambley PS, Clarke LP, Silbiger ML (1991) Uterine junctional zone: correlation between histologic findings and MR imaging. Radiology 179:409–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Demas BE, Hricak H, Jaffe RB (1986) Uterine MR imaging: effects of hormonal stimulation. Radiology 159:123–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fiocchi F, Nocetti L, Siopis E, Currá S, Costi T, Ligabue G, Toricelli P (2012) In vivo 3 T MR diffusion tensor imaging for detection of the fibre architecture of the human uterus: a feasibility and quantitative study. Br J Radiol 85:e1009–e1017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fornasa F, Montemezzi S (2012) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the normal endometrium: temporal and spatial variations of the apparent diffusion coefficient. Acta Radiol 53:586–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Foshager MC, Walsh JW (1994) CT anatomy of the female pelvis: a second look. Radiographics 14:51–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fujimoto K, Kido A, Okada T, Uchikoshi M, Togashi K (2013) Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of the normal human uterus in vivo at 3 tesla: comparison of DTI parameters in the different uterine layers. J Magn Reson Imaging 38:1494–1500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grossman J, Ricci ZJ, Rozenblit A, Freeman K, Mazzariol F, Stein MW (2008) Efficacy of contrast-enhanced CT in assessing the endometrium. AJR 191:664–669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hauth EAM, Jaeger HJ, Libera H, Lange S, Forsting M (2007) MR imaging of the uterus and cervix in healthy women: determination of normal values. Eur Radiol 17:734–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Haynor DR, Mack LA, Soules MR, Shuman WP, Montana MA, Moss AA (1986) Changing appearance of the normal uterus during the menstrual cycle: MR studies. Radiology 161:459–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. He Y, Ding N, Li Y, Li Z, Xiang Y, Jin Z, Xue H (2015) 3-T diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of normal uterus in young and middle-aged females during the menstrual cycle: evaluation of the cyclic changes of fractional anisotropy (FA) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. Br J Radiol 88:20150043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. He YL, Ding N, Li Y, Li Z, Xiang Y, Jin ZY, Xue HD (2016) Cyclic changes of the junctional zone on 3 T MRI images in young and middle-aged females during the menstrual cycle. Clin Radiol 71:341–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hricak H, Kim B (1993) Contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the female pelvis. J Magn Reson Imaging 3:297–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hricak H, Alpers C, Crooks LE, Sheldon PE (1983) Magnetic resonance of the female pelvis: initial experience. Airman 141:1119–1128Google Scholar
  16. Kaur H, Loyer EM, Minami M, Charnsangavej C (1998) Patterns of uterine enhancement with helical CT. Eur J Radiol 28:250–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kido A, Koyama T, Kataoka M, Yamamoto A, Saga T, Turner R, Togashi K (2007) Physiological changes of the human uterine myometrium during menstrual cycle: preliminary evaluation using BOLD MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 26:695–700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kido A, Kataoka M, Koyama T, Yamamoto A, Saga T, Togashi K (2010) Changes in apparent diffusion coefficients in the normal uterus during different phases of the menstrual cycle. Br J Radiol 83:524–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kormano MJ, Goske MJ, Hamlin DJ (1981) Attenuation and contrast enhancement of gynecologic organs and tumors in CT. Eur J Radiol 1(4):307–311PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kuang F, Ren J, Huan Y, Chen Z, Zhong Q (2012) Apparent diffusion coefficients of normal uterus in premenopausal women with 3.0-T magnetic resonance imaging. J Comput Assist Tomogr 36:54–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Langer JE, Oliver ER, Lev-Toaff AS, Coleman BG (2012) Imaging of the female pelvis through the life cycle. Radiographics 32:1575–1597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lim PS, Nazarian LN, Wechsler RJ, Kurtz AB, Parker L (2002) The endometrium on routine contrastenhanced CT in asymptomatic postmenopausal women: avoiding errors in interpretation. Clin Imaging 26:325–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mann GS, Blair JC, Garden AS (2012) Imaging of gynecological disorders in infants and children. Springer-Verlag, Berlin HeidelbergCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Masui T, Katayama M, Kobayashi S, Nakayama S, Nozaki A, Kabasawa H, Ito T, Sakahara H (2001) Changes in myometrial and junctional zone thickness and signal intensity: demonstration with kinematic T2-weighted MR imaging. Radiology 221:75–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McCarthy S, Tauber C, Gore J (1986) Female pelvic anatomy: MR assessment of variations during the menstrual cycle and with use of oral contraceptives. Radiology 160:119–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Novellas S, Chassang M, Delotte J, Toullalan O, Chevallier A, Bouaziz J, Chevallier P (2011) MRI characteristics of the uterine junctional zone: from normal to the diagnosis of adenomyosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 196:1206–1213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Punwani S (2011) Diffusion weighted imaging of female pelvic cancers: concepts and clinical applications. Eur J Radiol 78:21–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sala E, Rockall AG, Freeman SJ, Mitchell DG, Reinhold C (2013) The added role of MR imaging in treatment stratification of patients with gynecologic malignancies: what the radiologist needs to know. Radiology 266:717–740CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Scoutt LM, McCauley TR, Flynn SD, Luthringer DJ, McCarthy SM (1993) Zonal anatomy of the cervix: correlation of MR imaging and histologic examination of hysterectomy specimens. Radiology 186:159–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Siddall KA, Rubens DJ (2005) Multidetector CT of the female pelvis. Radiol Clin N Am 43:1097–1118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. deSouza NM, Hawley IC, Schwieso JE, Gilderdale DJ, Soutter WP (1994) The uterine cervix on in vitro and in vivo MR images: a study of zonal anatomy and vascularity using an enveloping cervical coil. Am J Roentgenol 163:607–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Takahata A, Koyama T, Kido A, Kataoka M, Umeoka S, Nishizawa S, Nishimura T, Togashi K (2009) The frequency of the plicae palmatae in the uterine cervix on MR imaging. Abdom Imaging 34:277–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Takeuchi M, Matsuzaki K, Nishitani H (2010) Manifestations of the female reproductive organs on MR images: changes induced by various physiologic states. Radiographics 30:1147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Thomassin-Naggara I, Balvay D, Cuenod CA, Daraï E, Marsault C, Bazot M (2010) Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging to assess physiologic variations of myometrial perfusion. Eur Radiol 20:984–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Togashi K, Kawakami S, Kimura I, Asato R, Okumura R, Fukuoka M, Mori T, Konishi J (1993a) Uterine contractions: possible diagnostic pitfall at MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 3:889–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Togashi K, Kawakami S, Kimura I, Asato R, Takakura K, Mori T, Konishi J (1993b) Sustained uterine contractions: a cause of hypointense myometrial bulging. Radiology 187:707–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Togashi K, Nakai A, Sugimura K (2001) Anatomy and physiology of the female pelvis: MR imaging revisited. J Magn Reson Imaging 3:842–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tsili AC, Argyropoulou MI, Tzarouchi L, Dalkalitsis N, Koliopoulos G, Paraskevaidis E, Tsampoulas K (2012) Apparent diffusion coefficient values of the normal uterus: interindividual variations during menstrual cycle. Eur J Radiol 81:1951–1956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yamashita Y, Harada M, Sawada T, Takahashi M, Miyazaki H, Okamura H (1993) Normal uterus and FIGO stage I endometrial carcinoma: dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 186:495–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yitta S, Hecht EM, Slywotzky CM, Bennett GL (2009) Added value of multiplanar reformation in the multidetector CT evaluation of the female pelvis: a pictorial review. Radiographics 29:1987–2005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yitta S, Hecht EM, Mausner EV, Bennett GL (2011) Normal or abnormal? Demystifying uterine and cervical contrast enhancement at multidetector CT. Radiographics 31:647–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Clinical RadiologyMedical School, University of IoanninaIoanninaGreece

Personalised recommendations