Incidental Findings – Ethical Aspects

Part of the Medical Radiology book series (MEDRAD)


This article deals with ethical aspects of incidental/secondary resp. discovery findings (IFs) from imaging techniques that are generated in clinical care, medical research or the context of direct-to-consumer services. After the questions and challenges, typically raised by IFs are introduced, the second part focusses on ethical prerequisites and reflects principles that are capable of providing a normative foundation in dealing with IFs. The final part presents recommendations on the basis of these principles as a guideline to ensure responsible planning as well as to take suitable measures, to avoid (or at least mitigate) the hazards of IFs.


Ethical Principle Royal College Incidental Finding Research Context Ethical Challenge 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This publication originates from within the framework of the research network MENON – medical theoretical, ethical, and economical evaluation of System Medicine. The MENON Consortium is financed by the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (federal ministry of education and research) (01GP1408A and 01GP1408B).


  1. Appelbaum PS, Lidz CW, Grisso T (2004) Therapeutic misconception in clinical research: frequency and risk factors. IRB Ethics Hum Res 26(2):1–8. doi: 10.2307/3564231 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baile WF, Buckmann R, Lenzi R, Glober G, Beale EA, Kudelka AP (2000) SPIKES – a six-step protocol for delivering bad news: application to the patient with cancer. Oncologist 5:302–311CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF (2009) Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2010) Medical profiling and online medicine: the ethics of ‘personalised healthcare’ in a consumer age, Chapter 10. Direct to consumer body Imaging. Accessed 07 Mar 2016
  5. Bjugn R (2015) Research findings with clinical implications. Tidsskr Nor Legeforen 135(8):755–758. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.14.0861 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Booth TC, Waldman AD, Wardlaw JM, Taylor SA, Jackson A (2012) Management of incidental findings during imaging research in “healthy” volunteers: current UK practice. Br J Radiol 85:11–21CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Brothers KB (2015) Wie konnte das passieren? Die US-amerikanische Perspektive auf Zufallsbefunde in den ACMG-Empfehlungen. In: Langanke M, Erdmann P, Robienski J, Rudnik-Schöneborn S (eds) Zufallsbefunde bei molekulargenetischen Untersuchungen. Medizinische, juristische und ethische Perspektiven. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 178–190Google Scholar
  8. Brothers KB, Langanke M, Erdmann P (2013) Implications of the incidentalome for clinical pharmacogenomics. Pharmacogenomics 14(11):1353–1362CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Chalmers I, Bracken MB, Djulbegovic B, Garattini S, Grant J, Gülmezoglu AM, Howells DW, Ioannidis JP, Oliver S (2014) How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. Lancet 383(9912):156–165CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Charmaz K (1993) Good days, bad days: the self and chronic illness in time. Rutgers University Press, New BrunswickGoogle Scholar
  11. Christenhusz GB, Devriendt K, Dierickx K (2013) To tell or not to tell? A systematic review of ethical reflections on incidental findings arising in genetic contexts. Eur J Hum Genet 21:248–255CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Cole C, Petree LE, Phillips JP, Shoemaker JM, Holdsworth M, Helitzer DL (2015) ‘Ethical responsibility’ or ‘a whole can of worms’: differences in opinion on incidental finding review and disclosure in neuroimaging research from focus group discussion with participants, parents, IRB members, investigators, physicians and community members. J Med Ethics 41(10):841–847. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2014-102552 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Erdmann P (2015a) Zufallsbefunde aus bildgebenden Verfahren in populationsbasierter Forschung. Mentis, MünsterGoogle Scholar
  14. Erdmann P (2015b) Handling incidental findings from imaging within IM related research. In: Fischer T, Langanke M, Marschall P, Michl S (eds) Individualized medicine. Ethical, economical and historical perspectives. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 231–250Google Scholar
  15. Erdmann P, Langanke M (2016) The ambivalence of early diagnosis – Dealing with the false-positive risk in current Alzheimer research. In: Current Alzheimer Research (accepted)Google Scholar
  16. Erdmann P, Fischer T, Raths S, Fleßa S, Langanke M (2015) Systemmedizin – Herausforderungen eines aktuellen Ansatzes. Deutsches Ärzteblatt 112:A1330–A1334Google Scholar
  17. Hoffmann M (2014) Zufallsbefunde in der epidemiologischen Forschung. In: Lenk C, Duttge G, Fangerau H (eds) Handbuch Ethik und Recht der Forschung am Menschen. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 305–311. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-35099-3_52 Google Scholar
  18. Kohane IS, Masys DR, Altman RB (2006) The incidentalome: a threat to genomic medicine. JAMA 296(2):212–215CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Langanke M, Erdmann P (2011) Die MRT als wissenschaftliche Studienuntersuchung und das Problem der Mitteilung von Zufallsbefunden. Probandenethische Herausforderungen. In: Theißen H, Langanke M (eds) Tragfähige Rede von Gott. Festgabe für Heinrich Assel zum 50. Geburtstag am 9. Februar 2011. Verlag Dr. Kovač, Hamburg, pp 197–240Google Scholar
  20. Langanke M, Fasold J, Erdmann P, Lorbeer R, Liedtke W (2015) Informed consent in Gani_Med – a sectional design for clinical epidemiological studies within individualized medicine. In: Fischer T, Langanke M, Marschall P, Michl S (eds) Individualized medicine. Ethical, economical and historical perspectives. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 183–208Google Scholar
  21. Levine PA (2010) In an unspoken voice. How the body releases trauma and restores goodness. North Atlantic Books/ERGOS Institute Press, BerkleyGoogle Scholar
  22. Munk MD, Peitzmann AD, Hostler DP, Wolfson AB (2010) Frequency and follow-up of incidental findings on trauma computed tomography scans: experience at a level one trauma center. J Emerg Med 38(3):346–350CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues (eds) (2013) Anticipate and communicate. Ethical management of incidental and secondary findings in the clinical, research, and direct-to-consumer-contexts. Accessed 12 Jan 2016
  24. Puls R, Hamm B, Hosten N (2010) MRT ohne Radiologen – ethische Aspekte bei bevölkerungsbasierten Studien mit MR-Untersuchung. Fortschr Röntgenstr 182:469–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rudnik-Schöneborn S, Langanke M, Erdmann P, Robienski J (2014) Ethische und rechtliche Aspekte im Umgang mit genetischen Zufallsbefunden – Herausforderungen und Lösungsansätze. Ethik in der Medizin 26:105–119. doi: 10.1007/s00481-013-0244-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Al-Shahi Salman R, Whiteley WN, Warlow C (2007) Screening using whole-body magnetic resonance imaging scanning: who wants an incidentaloma? J Med Screen 14(1):2–4CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Schmidt CO, Hegenscheid K, Erdmann P, Kohlmann T, Langanke M, Völzke H, Puls R, Assel H, Biffar R, Grabe HJ (2013) Psychosocial consequences and severity of disclosed incidental findings from whole-body MRI in a general population study. Eur Radiol 23:1343–1351CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Strafgesetzbuch in der Fassung der Bekanntmachung vom 13. November 1998 (BGBl. I S. 3322), das durch Artikel 15 des Gesetzes vom 4. Juli 2013 (BGBl. I S. 1981) geändert worden ist. Accessed 07 Mar 2016
  29. The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1978) The Belmont report: ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Washington (DC). Accessed 07 Mar 2016
  30. The Royal College of Radiologists (eds) (2011) Management of incidental findings detected during research imaging. A report by representatives of research imaging centres, professional societies, regulatory bodies, funding organisations, royal colleges involved in research imaging and patient organisations, in the UK. Accessed 13 Jan 2016
  31. WMA Declaration of Helsinki – Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. 64th WMA General Assembly, Fortaleza, Brazil, October 2013. Accessed 07 Mar 2016
  32. Wolf SM, Lawrence FP, Nelson CA, Kahn JP, Cho MK, Wright Clayton E, Fletcher JG, Georgieff MK, Hammerschmidt D, Hudson K, Illes J, Kapur V, Keane MA, Koenig BA, LeRoy BS, McFarland EG, Paradise J, Parker LS, Terry SF, Van Ness B, Wilfond BS (2008) Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations. J Law Med Ethics 36(2):219–248CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Theologische Fakultät, Lehrstuhl für Systematische TheologieErnst-Moritz-Arndt-Universität GreifswaldGreifswaldGermany

Personalised recommendations