Incidental Findings in a Population Based Study Using Cardiac CT: Experience from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA)

Part of the Medical Radiology book series (MEDRAD)


The Multiethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) Study was initiated in July 2000 to investigate the prevalence, correlates, and progression of subclinical cardiovascular disease in a population-based sample of 6,814 men and women aged 45-84 years at 6 clinical centers. Coronary artery calcium has been measured in serial exams using Electron-beam and multi-detector row computed tomography scanners. Since 2000, there have been 5 exams and participants have undergone cardiac scans at the 6 clinical centers. The CT Reading Center for cardiac scans in the MESA Study is at Los Angeles Biomedical Research Center. In this chapter we discuss technical parameters of the CT studies, prevalence of different incidental findings and our approach in evaluating and reporting these findings.


Coronary Artery Calcium Cardiac Compute Tomography Aortic Valve Calcification Compute Tomography Exam Gantry Rotation Speed 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Agatston AS et al (1990) Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 15(4):827–832CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Alfakih K, Budoff M (2011) Multi-detector computed tomography coronary angiography: the incidental lung findings. J R Soc Med 104(2):50–51CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashton HA et al (2002) The Multicentre Aneurysm Screening Study (MASS) into the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm screening on mortality in men: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 360(9345):1531–1539CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bild DE et al (2002) Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis: objectives and design. Am J Epidemiol 156(9):871–881CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Budoff MJ, Gopal A (2007) Incidental findings on cardiac computed tomography. Should we look? J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 1(2):97–105CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Budoff MJ, Fischer H, Gopal A (2006) Incidental findings with cardiac CT evaluation: should we read beyond the heart? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 68(6):965–973CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Budoff MJ et al (2013a) Progression of coronary calcium and incident coronary heart disease events: MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis). J Am Coll Cardiol 61(12):1231–1239CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Budoff MJ et al (2013b) A comparison of outcomes with coronary artery calcium scanning in unselected populations: the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) and Heinz Nixdorf RECALL study (HNR). J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 7(3):182–191CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Carr JJ et al (2005) Calcified coronary artery plaque measurement with cardiac CT in population-based studies: standardized protocol of Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) and Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) study. Radiology 234(1):35–43CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Detrano RC et al (2005) Coronary calcium measurements: effect of CT scanner type and calcium measure on rescan reproducibility--MESA study. Radiology 236(2):477–484CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. MacMahon H et al (2005) Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology 237(2):395–400CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Shavelle DM et al (2003) Usefulness of aortic valve calcium scores by electron beam computed tomography as a marker for aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 92(3):349–353CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of CardiologyLos Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLATorranceUSA

Personalised recommendations