Dynamic, Time-Resolved Imaging of Myocardial Perfusion Using 256-Slice Computed Tomography

  • Teruhito Mochizuki
  • Akira Kurata
  • Teruhito Kido
Part of the Medical Radiology book series (MEDRAD)


Historically, myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) has been used to assess myocardial perfusion. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been used to assess both myocardial perfusion and delayed enhancement (viability). However, computed tomography (CT) has advantages over MPS and MRI in terms of spatial resolution, availability, simplicity, and shorter test time. CT can assess myocardial perfusion as increased myocardial contrast density. Adenosine triphosphate (ATP) or adenosine stress perfusion CT is comparable to MPS and MRI for the assessment of myocardial perfusion reserve (ischemia). When dynamic (first-pass) data are acquired, absolute myocardial blood flow (MBF, ml g −1min−1) can be measured by analyzing the time–density curve of myocardium and blood pool. Using wide-range multislice CT (256- to 320-slice CT) for dynamic acquisition, whole-heart regional MBF can be measured. In this chapter, the potential of 256-slice CT in the assessment of myocardial perfusion and viability is illustrated.


Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Myocardial Perfusion Myocardial Blood Flow Coronary Compute Tomography Angiography Perfusion Compute Tomography 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bamberg F et al (2011) Detection of hemodynamically significant coronary artery stenosis: incremental diagnostic value of dynamic CT-bases myocardial perfusion imaging. Radiology 260:528–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Hachamovitch R et al (2003) Comparison of the short-term survival benefit associated with revascularization compared with medical therapy in patients with no prior coronary artery disease undergoing stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography. Circulation 107:2900–2906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hachamovitch R et al (2005) Prognostic score for prediction of cardiac mortality risk after adenosine stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. J Am Coll Cardiol 45:722–729PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Herzog BA et al (2009) Long-term prognostic value of 13 N-ammonia myocardial perfusion emission tomography added value of coronary flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol 52:150–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Iida H et al (2000) Quantitative assessment of regional myocardial blood flow using oxygen-15-labelled water and positron emission tomography: a multicentre evaluation in Japan. Eur J Nucl Med 27:748–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kido T et al (2008) Quantification of regional myocardial blood flow using first-pass multidetector-row computed tomography and adenosine triphosphate in coronary artery disease. Circ J 72:1086–1091PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kurata A et al (2005) Myocardial perfusion imaging using adenosine triphosphate stress multi-slice computed tomography: alternative to stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. Circ J 69:550–557PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lee DC et al (2009) Quantification of absolute myocardial blood flow by magnetic resonance perfusion imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2:761–770PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Miyagawa M et al (1995) Thallium-201 myocardial tomography with intravenous infusion of adenosine triphosphate in diagnosis of coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 26:1196–1201PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mochizuki T et al (1999b) Demonstration of acute myocardial infarction by subsecond spiral computed tomography: early defect and delayed enhancement. Circulation 99:2058–2059CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mochizuki T et al (1999a) LAD stenosis detected by subsecond spiral CT. Circulation 99:1523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nieman K et al (2008) Reperfused myocardial infarction: contrast-enhanced 64-section CT in comparison to MR imaging. Radiology 247:49–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pack NA et al (2008) Estimating myocardial perfusion from dynamic contrast-enhanced CMR with a model-independent deconvolution method. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 10:12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Patlak CS et al (1985) Graphical evaluation of blood-to-brain transfer constants from multiple-time uptake data. Generalizations J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 5:584–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Sakuma H et al (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of stress first-pass contrast-enhanced myocardial perfusion MRI compared with stress myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185:95–102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Shikata F et al (2010) Regional myocardial blood flow measured by stress multidetector computed tomography as a predictor of left ventricular function after coronary artery bypass grafting. Am Heart J 160:528–534PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Slomka PJ et al (2012) Comparison of clinical tools for measurement of regional stress and rest myocardial blood flow with 13 N-ammonia PET/CT. J Nucl Med 53:171–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Teruhito Mochizuki
    • 1
  • Akira Kurata
    • 1
  • Teruhito Kido
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyEhime University School of MedicineShitsukawa Toon EhimeJapan

Personalised recommendations