Radioembolization: Identifying and Managing Anatomic Variants

  • Rajesh P. Shah
  • Daniel Y. Sze
Part of the Medical Radiology book series (MEDRAD)


Radioembolization treatment carries the risk of non-target embolization as well as of incomplete treatment. The distribution of microspheres reflects the arterial vascular territory subtended by the injected arteries. Thus, it is important to recognize anatomic variants in hepatic arterial anatomy. These variants include congenital accessory and replaced arteries supplying portions of the liver and the tumors within, as well as parasitized non-hepatic arteries recruited to supply arterial blood to intrahepatic tumors. Several different strategies allow more safe and complete radioembolization preparation and treatment in the presence of these variants. Consolidation or redistribution of flow may be performed to simplify or to increase the safety of microsphere administration. Likewise, parasitized extrahepatic vessels may be embolized to restore intrahepatic flow to tumors, thus, limiting risk for non-target embolization and increasing completeness of treatment. Both scenarios require close attention to tumor blood supply and recognition of arterial variants.


Single Photon Emission Compute Tomography Hepatic Artery Digital Subtraction Angiography Coil Embolization Common Hepatic Artery 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Abdelmaksoud MHK, Louie JD, Kothary N et al (2011) Consolidation of hepatic arterial inflow by embolization of variant hepatic arteries in preparation for yttrium-90 radioembolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 22(10):1364–1372PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Abdelmaksoud MHK, Louie JD, Kothary N et al (2011) Embolization of parasitized extrahepatic arteries to reestablish intrahepatic arterial supply to tumors before yttrium-90 radioembolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 22(10):1355–1362PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrews JC, Walker SC, Ackermann RJ, Cotton LA, Ensminger WD, Shapiro B (1994) Hepatic radioembolization with y-90 containing glass microspheres-preliminary-results and clinical follow-up. J Nucl Med 35(10):1637–1644PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bilbao JI, Garrastachu P, Herraiz MJ et al (2010) Safety and efficacy assessment of flow redistribution by occlusion of intrahepatic vessels prior to radioembolization in the treatment of liver tumors. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 33(3):523–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Charnsangavej C, Chuang VP, Wallace S, Soo CS, Bowers T (1982) Angiographic classification of hepatic arterial collaterals. Radiology 144(3):485–494PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chuang VP, Wallace S (1980) Hepatic arterial redistribution for intra-arterial infusion of hepatic neoplasms. Radiology 135(2):295–299PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chung JW, Park JH, Han JK, Choi BI, Kim TK, Han MC (1998) Transcatheter oily chemoembolization of the inferior phrenic artery in hepatocellular carcinoma: the safety and potential therapeutic role. J Vasc Interv Radiol 9(3):495–500PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chung JW, Kim HC, Yoon JH et al (2006) Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma: prevalence and causative factors of extrahepatic collateral arteries in 479 patients. Korean J Radiol 7(4):257–266PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Covey AM, Brody LA, Maluccio MA, Getrajdman GI, Brown KT (2002) Variant hepatic arterial anatomy revisited: digital subtraction angiography performed in 600 patients. Radiology 224(2):542–547PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Karunanithy N, Gordon F, Hodolic M et al (2011) Embolization of hepatic arterial branches to simplify hepatic blood flow before yttrium 90 radioembolization: a useful technique in the presence of challenging anatomy. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 34(2):287–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kim HC, Chung JW, Lee W, Jae HJ, Park JH (2005) Recognizing extrahepatic collateral vessels that supply hepatocellular carcinoma to avoid complications of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization. Radiographics 25:S25–S40PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kim HC, Chung JW, Choi SH, et al (2007) Hepatocellular carcinoma with internal mammary artery supply: feasibility and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization and factors affecting patient prognosis. J Vasc Interv Radiol 18(5):611–619 (quiz 620)Google Scholar
  13. Koehler RE, Korobkin M, Lewis F (1975) Arteriographic demonstration of collateral arterial supply to liver after hepatic-artery ligation. Radiology 117(1):49–54PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Lee KH, Liapi E, Vossen JA et al (2008) Distribution of iron oxide-containing embosphere particles after transcatheter arterial embolization in an animal model of liver cancer: evaluation with MR imaging and implication for therapy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 19(10):1490–1496PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lewandowski RJ, Sato KT, Atassi B et al (2007) Radioembolization with 90Y microspheres: angiographic and technical considerations. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 30(4):571–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mays ET, Wheeler CS (1974) Demonstration of collateral arterial flow after interruption of hepatic arteries in man. N Engl J Med 290(18):993–996PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Michels NA (1966) Newer anatomy of liver and its variant blood supply and collateral circulation. Am J Surg 112(3):337–347Google Scholar
  18. Miyayama S, Matsui O, Akakura Y et al (2001) Hepatocellular carcinoma with blood supply from omental branches: treatment with transcatheter arterial embolization. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12(11):1285–1290PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Miyayama S, Yamashiro M, Okuda M et al (2010) The march of extrahepatic collaterals: analysis of blood supply to hepatocellular carcinoma located in the bare area of the liver after chemoembolization. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 33(3):513–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Park SI, Yun Lee D, Yoon Won J, Tae Lee J (2003) Extrahepatic collateral supply of hepatocellular carcinoma by the intercostal arteries. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14(4):461–468PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Riaz A, Lewandowski RJ, Kulik LM, et al (2009) Complications following radioembolization with yttrium-90 microspheres: a comprehensive literature review. J Vasc Interv Radiol 20(9):1121–1130 (quiz 1131)Google Scholar
  22. Seki H, Kimura M, Yoshimura N, Yamamoto S, Ozaki T, Sakai K (1998) Development of extrahepatic arterial blood supply to the liver during hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy. Eur Radiol 8(9):1613–1618PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tohma T, Cho A, Okazumi S et al (2005) Communicating arcade between the right and left hepatic arteries: evaluation with CT and angiography during temporary balloon occlusion of the right or left hepatic artery. Radiology 237(1):361–365PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Interventional Radiology, 300 Pasteur Drive H3630Stanford University Medical CenterStanfordUSA
  2. 2.Division of Interventional RadiologyStanford University Medical CenterStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations