Advertisement

Crohn’s Disease

  • Giovanni Maconi
Chapter
Part of the Medical Radiology book series (MEDRAD)

Abstract

Intestinal ultrasound has been proven to be a useful as a screening tool in patients with clinically suspected Crohn’s disease as well as in the follow-up of patients already diagnosed with Crohn’s disease. In these patients, it is possible to assess the site and extent of the lesions and ensure early detection of intra-abdominal complications, in particular abscesses and strictures. Intestinal ultrasound may be also used for monitoring Crohn’s disease following surgery, revealing early recurrence of the disease and suggesting the clinical and endoscopic outcome. Despite several attempts to correlate the ultrasonographic findings with Crohn’s disease activity, to date, only ultrasonographic assessment of endoscopic activity is convincing.

Keywords

Bowel Wall Oral Contrast Agent Free Perforation Thicken Bowel Wall Internal Fistula 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Andreoli A, Cerro P, Falasco G et al (1998) Role of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of postsurgical recurrence of Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol 93:1117–1121PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brignola C, Belloli C, Iannone P et al (1993) Comparison of scintigraphy with indium-111 leukocyte scan and ultrasonography in assessment of X-ray-demonstrated lesions of Crohn’s disease. Dig Dis Sci 38:433–437PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bru C, Sans M, Defelitto MM et al (2001) Hydrocolonic sonography for evaluating inflammatory bowel disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177:99–105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Castiglione F, de Sio I, Cozzolino A et al (2004) Bowel wall thickness at abdominal ultrasound and the one-year-risk of surgery in patients with Crohn’s disease. Am J Gastroenterol 99:1977–1983PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Di Candio G, Mosca F, Campatelli A et al (1986) Sonographic detection of postsurgical recurrence of Crohn disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 146:523–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Di Mizio R, Maconi G, Romano S et al (2004) Small bowel Crohn disease: sonographic features. Abdom Imaging 29:23–35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Di Sabatino A, Ciccocioppo R, Armellini E et al (2004) Serum bFGF and VEGF correlate respectively with bowel wall thickness and intramural blood flow in Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 10:573–577PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Esteban JM, Maldonado L, Sanchiz V et al (2001) Activity of Crohn’s disease assessed by colour Doppler ultrasound analysis of the affected loops. Eur Radiol 11:1423–1428PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fenoglio-Preiser CM, Lantz PE, Listrom MB et al (1989) Gastrointestinal pathology; an atlas and text. Raven Press, New York, pp 427–484Google Scholar
  10. Fraquelli M, Colli A, Casazza G et al (2005) Role of US in detection of Crohn’s disease: meta-analysis. Radiology 236:95–101PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Futagami Y, Haruma K, Hata J et al (1999) Development and validation of an US activity index of Crohn’s disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 11:1007–1012PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gasche C, Moser G, Turetschek K et al (1999) Transabdominal bowel sonography for detection of intestinal complication in Crohn’s disease. Gut 44:112–117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goldberg HI, Gore RM, Margulis AR et al (1983) Computed tomography in the evaluation of Crohn’s disease. AJR Am J Roengtenol 140:277–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haber HP, Busch A, Ziebach R, Stern M (2000) Bowel wall thickness measured by ultrasound as a marker of Crohn’s disease activity in children. Lancet 355:1239–1240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Haber HP, Busch A, Ziebach R et al (2002) US findings correspond to clinical, endoscopic, and histologic findings in inflammatory bowel disease and other enterocolitides. J Ultrasound Med 21:375–382PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hata J, Haruma K, Yamanaka H et al (1994) US evaluation of the bowel wall in inflammatory bowel disease: comparison of in vivo and in vitro studies. Abdom Imaging 19:395–399PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heyne R, Rickes S, Bock P et al (2002) Non-invasive evaluation of activity in inflammatory bowel disease by power Doppler sonography. Z Gastroenterol 40:171–175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ko YT, Lim JH, Lee DH et al (1993) Small bowel obstruction: sonographic evaluation. Radiology 188:649–653PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kunihiro K, Hata J, Haruma K et al (2004) Sonographic detection of longitudinal ulcers in Crohn disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 39:322–326PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Maconi G, Parente F, Bollani S et al (1996a) Abdominal ultrasound in the assessment of extent and activity of Crohn’s disease: clinical significance and implication of bowel wall thickening. Am J Gastroenterol 91:1604–1609PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Maconi G, Bollani S, Bianchi Porro G (1996b) Ultrasonographic detection of intestinal complications in Crohn’s disease. Dig Dis Sci 41:1643–1648PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Maconi G, Parente F, Bianchi Porro G (1999) Hydrogen peroxide enhanced ultrasound-fistulography in the assessment of enterocutaneous fistulas complicating Crohn’s disease. Gut 45:874–878PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Maconi G, Sampietro GM, Cristaldi M et al (2001) Preoperative characteristics and postoperative behaviour of bowel wall on risk of recurrence after conservative surgery in Crohn’s disease a prospective study. Ann Surg 233:345–352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Maconi G, Sampietro GM, Russo A et al (2002) The vascularity of internal fistulae in Crohn’s disease: an in vivo power Doppler ultrasonography assessment. Gut 50:496–500PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Maconi G, Carsana L, Fociani P et al (2003a) Small bowel stenosis in Crohn’s disease: clinical, biochemical and US evaluation of histological features. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 18:749–756PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Maconi G, Sampietro GM, Parente F et al (2003b) Contrast radiology, computed tomography and ultrasonography in detecting internal fistulas and intra-abdominal abscesses in Crohn’s disease: a prospective comparative study. Am J Gastroenterol 98:1545–1555PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Maconi G, Greco S, Duca P et al (2008) Prevalence and clinical significance of sonographic evidence of mesenteric fat alterations in Crohn’s disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 14:1555–1561PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mayer D, Reinshagen M, Mason RA et al (2000) Sonographic measurement of thickened bowel wall segments as a quantitative parameter for activity in inflammatory bowel disease. Z Gastroenterol 38:295–300PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nagler SM, Poticha SM (1979) Intra-abdominal abscesses in regional enteritis. Am J Surg 173:350–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Neye H, Voderholzer W, Rickes S et al (2004) Evaluation of criteria for the activity of Crohn’s disease by power Doppler sonography. Dig Dis 22:67–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nylund K, Leh S, Immervoll H et al (2008) Crohn’s disease: comparison of in vitro ultrasonographic images and histology. Scand J Gastroenterol 43:719–726PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Oberhuber G, Stangl PC, Vogelsang H et al (2000) Significant association of strictures and internal fistula formation in Crohn’s disease. Virchows Arch 437:293–297PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Panes J, Bouzas R, Chaparro M et al (2011) Systematic review: the use of ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging fro the diagnosis, assessment of activity and abdominal complications of Crohn’s disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 34:125–145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Parente F, Maconi G, Bollani S et al (2002) Bowel ultrasound in assessment of Crohn’s disease and detection of related small bowel strictures. a prospective comparative study versus X-ray and intraoperative findings. Gut 50:490–495PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Parente F, Greco S, Molteni M et al (2003) Role of early ultrasound in detecting inflammatory intestinal disorders and identifying their anatomical location within the bowel. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 18:1009–1016PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Parente F, Greco S, Molteni M et al (2004a) Modern imaging of Crohn’s disease using bowel ultrasound. Inflamm Bowel Dis 10:452–461PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Parente F, Greco S, Molteni M et al (2004b) Oral contrast enhanced bowel ultrasonography in the assessment of small intestine Crohn’s disease. a prospective comparison with conventional ultrasound, x ray studies, and ileocolonoscopy. Gut 53:1652–1657PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rigazio C, Ercole E, Laudi C et al (2009) Abdominal bowel ultrasound can predict the risk of surgery in Crohn’s disease: proposal of an ultrasonographic score. Scand J Gastroenterol 44:585–593PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sarrazin J, Wilson SR (1996) Manifestation of Crohn disease at US. Radiographics 16:499–520PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Scholbach T, Herrero I, Scholbach J (2004) Dynamic color Doppler sonography of intestinal wall in patients with Crohn disease compared with healthy subjects. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 39:524–528PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Simpkins KC, Gore RM (1994) Crohn’s disease. In: Gore RM, Levine MS, Laufer I (eds) Textbook of gastrointestinal radiology. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 2660–2681Google Scholar
  42. Spalinger J, Patriquin H, Miron MC et al (2000) Doppler US in patients with Crohn disease: vessel density in the diseased bowel reflects disease activity. Radiology 217:787–791PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Steinberg DM, Cooke WT, Alexander Williams J (1973) Abscesses and fistulae in Crohn’s disease. Gut 14:865–869PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tarjan Z, Toth G, Gyorke T et al (2000) Ultrasound in Crohn’s disease of the small bowel. Eur J Radiol 35:176–182PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Truong M, Atri M, Bret PM et al (1998) Sonographic appearance of benign and malignant conditions of the colon. Am J Roentgenol 170:1451–1455CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Yekeler E, Danalioglu A, Movasseghi B et al (2005) Crohn disease activity evaluated by Doppler ultrasonography of the superior mesenteric artery and the affected small-bowel segments. J Ultrasound Med 24:59–65PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Chair of Gastroenterology, Department of Clinical Sciences“L. Sacco” University HospitalMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations