Advertisement

Imaging Fibroids Pre and Post Uterine Artery Embolisation

  • Audrey E. T. Jacques
Chapter
Part of the Medical Radiology book series (MEDRAD)

Abstract

Fibroids are common in women of reproductive age and non-surgical management with uterine artery embolisation for symptomatic patients is increasingly performed. In this chapter, the role of diagnostic radiology, in particular MRI, in the diagnosis, mapping and assessment of fibroid disease prior to embolisation is discussed. While ultrasound is readily available, MRI has been shown to be more accurate at characterising fibroids and defining their number and location. In particular fibroid vascularity prior to embolisation is well demonstrated with Gadolinium-enhanced MRI. Contraindications to embolisation such as pedunculated fibroids on a narrow stalk or non-vascular, degenerated fibroids are also readily identified with MRI. Following embolisation, early change in fibroid vascularity can be demonstrated which has a prognostic implication to long-term response. Post-embolisation appearances such as intra-fibroid gas, infection and fibroid passage are also discussed and demonstrated. Given that uterine artery embolisation is increasingly being performed, diagnostic radiologists therefore need to be familiar with pre-treatment diagnosis and assessment and typical post-embolisation appearances.

Keywords

Uterine Artery Embolisation Uterine Sarcoma Abnormal Uterine Bleeding Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma Intramural Fibroid 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ascher SM, Arnold LL, Patt RH, Schruefer JJ, Bagley AS, Semelka RC, Zeman RK, Simon JA (1994) Adenomyosis: prospective comparison of MR imaging and transvaginal sonography. Radiology 190(3):803–806PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Buttram VC, Reiter RC (1981) Uterine leiomyomata: etiology, symptomatology, and management. Fertil Steril 36(4):433–445PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Cornfeld D, Israel G, Martel M, Weinreb J, Schwartz P, McCarthy S (2010) MRI appearance of mesenchymal tumors of the uterus. Eur J Radiol 74:241–249PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ghai S, Rajan DK, Benjamin MS, Asch MR, Ghai S (2005) Uterine artery embolization for leiomyomas: pre- and postprocedural evaluation with US. Radiographics 25:1159–1172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Godfrey CD, Zbella EA (2001) Uterine necrosis after uterine artery embolization for leiomyoma. Obstet Gynecol 98:950–952PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Goodwin SC, Bonilla SM, Sacks D, Reed RA, Spies JB, Landow WJ, Worthington-Kirsch RL, Members of the Reporting Standards for Uterine Artery Embolization (UAE) Subcommittee, the Members of the UAE Task Force Standards Subcommittee, and the Members of the SCVIR Technology Assessment Committee (2001) Reporting standards for uterine artery embolization for the treatment of uterine leiomyomata. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12(9):1011–1020Google Scholar
  7. Gupta JK, Sinha AS, Lumsden MA, Hickey M (2006) Uterine artery embolization for symptomatic uterine fibroids. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 25(1):CD005073Google Scholar
  8. Katsumori T, Nakajima K, Tokuhiro M (2001) Gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging in the evaluation of uterine fibroids treated with uterine artery embolization. AJR Am J Roentgenol 177(2):303–307PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Katsumori T, Akazawa K, Mihara T (2005) Uterine artery embolization for pedunculated subserosal fibroids. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184(2):399–402PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Katsumori T, Kasahara T, Kin Y, Nozaki T (2008) Infarction of uterine fibroids after embolization: relationship between postprocedural enhanced MRI findings and long-term clinical outcomes. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 31(1):66–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kim MD, Kim S, Kim NK, Lee MH, Ahn EH, Kim HJ, Cho JH, Cha SH (2007) Long-term results of uterine artery embolization for symptomatic adenomyosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188(1):176–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kitajima K, Murakami K, Yamasaki E, Kaji Y, Sugimura K (2008) Standardized uptake values of uterine leiomyoma with 18F-FDG PET/CT: variation with age, size, degeneration, and contrast enhancement on MRI. Ann Nucl Med 22:505–512PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kitajima K, Murakami K, Kaji Y, Sugimura K (2010) Spectrum of FDG PET/CT findings of uterine tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:737–1743PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kroencke TJ, Scheurig C, Poellinger A, Gronewold M, Hamm B (2010) Uterine artery embolization for leiomyomas: percentage of infarction predicts clinical outcome. Radiology 255(3):834–841PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mara M, Fucikova Z, Kuzel D, Maskova J, Dundr P, Zizka Z (2007) Hysteroscopy after uterine fibroid embolization in women of fertile age. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 33(3):316–324PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Namimoto T, Yamashita Y, Awai K, Nakaura T, Yanaga Y, Hirai T, Saito T, Katabuchi H (2009) Combined use of T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted 3-T MR imaging for differentiating uterine sarcomas from benign leiomyomas. Eur Radiol 19:2756–2764PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Omary RA, Vasireddy S, Chrisman HB, Ryu RK, Pereles FS, Carr JC, Resnick SA, Nemcek AA Jr, Vogelzang RL (2002) The effect of pelvic MR imaging on the diagnosis and treatment of women with presumed symptomatic uterine fibroids. J Vasc Interv Radiol 13(11):1149–1153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Park HR, Kim MD, Kim NK, Kim HJ, Yoon SW, Park WK, Lee MH (2005) Uterine restoration after repeated sloughing of fibroids or vaginal expulsion following uterine artery embolisation. Eur Radiol 15:1850–1854PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pelage JP, Guaou NG, Jha RC, Ascher SM, Spies JB (2004) Uterine fibroid tumors: long-term MR imaging outcome after embolization. Radiology 230(3):803–809PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pron G, Bennett J, Common A, Wall J, Asch M, Sniderman K, Ontario Uterine Fibroid Embolization Collaboration Group (2003) The Ontario uterine fibroid embolization trial. Part 2. Uterine fibroid reduction and symptom relief after uterine artery embolization for fibroids. Fertil Steril 79(1):120–127Google Scholar
  21. Radeleff B, Eiers M, Bellemann N, Ramsauer S, Rimbach S, Kauczor HU, Richter GM (2010) Expulsion of dominant submucosal fibroids after uterine artery embolization. Eur J Radiol 75(1):e57–e63PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Rajan DK, Margau R, Kroll RR, simons ME, Tan KT, Jaskolka JD, Kachura JR, Sniderman KW, Beecroft JR, Haider M (2011) Clinical utility of ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging for deciding to proceed with uterine artery embolization for presumed symptomatic fibroids. Clin Radiol 66:57–62Google Scholar
  23. Spielmann AL, Keogh C, Forster BB, Martin ML, Machan LS (2006) Comparison of MRI and sonography in the preliminary evaluation for fibroid embolisation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:1499–1504PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Spies JB, Roth AR, Jha RC, Gomez-Jorge J, Levy EB, Chang TC, Ascher SA (2002a) Leiomyomata treated with uterine artery embolization: factors associated with successful symptom and imaging outcome. Radiology 222(1):45–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Spies JB, Spector A, Roth AR, Baker CM, Mauro L, Murphy-Skrynarz K (2002b) Complications after uterine artery embolization for leiomyomas. Obstet Gynecol 100:873–880PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tanaka YO, Nishida M, Tsunoda H, Okamoto Y, Yoshikawa H (2004) Smooth muscle tumors of uncertain malignant potential and leiomyosarcomas of the uterus: MR findings. J Magn Reson Imaging 20:998–1007PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Togashi K, Ozasa H, Konishi I et al (1989) Enlarged uterus: differentiation between adenomyosis and leiomyoma with MR imaging. Radiology 171(2):531–534PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Toor SS, Tan KT, Simons ME, Rajan DK, Beecroft JR, Hayeems E, Sniderman KW (2008) Clinical failure after uterine artery embolization: evaluation of patient and MR imaging characteristics. J Vasc Interv Radiol 19(5):662–667PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Torigian DA, Siegelman ES, Terhune KP, Butts SF, Blasco L, Shlansky-Goldberg RD (2005) MRI of uterine necrosis after uterine artery embolization for treatment of uterine leiomyomata. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:555–559PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Verma SK, Bergin D, Gonsalves CF, Mitchell DG, Lev-Toaff AS, Parker L (2008) Submucosal fibroids becoming endocavitary following uterine artery embolization: risk assessment by MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190(5):1220–1226PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Walker WJ, Pelage JP (2002) Uterine artery embolisation for symptomatic fibroids: clinical results in 400 women with imaging follow up. BJOG 109:1262–1272PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Worthington-Kirsch RL, Popky GL, Hutchins FL (1998) Uterine arterial embolization for the management of leiomyomas: quality-of-life assessment and clinical response. Radiology 208(3):625–629PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of RadiologySt Thomas’ HospitalLondonUK

Personalised recommendations