The Use of FRAX® in DXA Interpretation
The World Health Organization (WHO) recently developed a fracture risk algorithm (FRAX®) that has fundamentally changed how clinical Dual X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scans are interpreted. The impact of FRAX on the community of clinicians who diagnose and treat patients with osteoporosis almost rivals the introduction of the T-score two decades ago. We review the clinical utility of FRAX in this chapter and show how our practice of DXA interpretation and reporting has changed with its introduction.
KeywordsBone Mineral Density Fracture Risk Osteoporotic Fracture Clinical Risk Factor Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density
- Hillier TA, Cauley JA, Rizzo JH, Pedula KL, Ensrud KE, Bauer DC, Lui L, Vesco KK, Black DM, Donaldson MG, LeBlanc ES, Cummings SR (2011) WHO absolute fracture risk models (FRAX): do clinical risk factors improve fracture prediction in older women without osteoporosis? J Bone Miner Res 26(8):1774–1782PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Masud T, Morris RO (2001) Epidemiology of falls. Age Ageing 30(4):S9–S16Google Scholar
- National Osteoporosis Foundation (2010) Clinician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosisGoogle Scholar
- National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (2010) Osteoporosis: clinical guideline for prevention and treatmentGoogle Scholar
- Siris ES, Brenneman SK, Barrett-Connor E, Miller PD, Saijan S, Berger ML, Chen YT (2006) The effect of age and bone mineral density on the absolute, excess, and relative risk of fracture in postmenopausal women aged 50–99: results from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment (NORA). Osteoporos Int 17:565–574PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar