Dysphagia pp 329-337 | Cite as

Impedance Planimetry

  • Johannes LenglingerEmail author
Part of the Medical Radiology book series (MEDRAD)


Impedance planimetry is an imaging technique that displays the distensibility of hollow viscera. Inside a bag filled with a conductive solution multiple impedance tracings between pairs of electrodes are converted to estimate cross sectional areas. With simultaneous measurement of intrabag pressure distensibility (smallest cross sectional area vs. intrabag pressure) is calculated. Impedance planimetry measurements characterize biomechanical properties of the esophago-gastric junction, the esophageal body and the pharyngo-esophageal sphincter. In healthy volunteers distensbiliity of the esophagogastric junction was lowest at the diaphragmatic hiatus and cross sectional areas of 38, 94, and 264 mm2 at distension volumes of 20, 30 and 40 ml were reported. Distension of the esophageal body resulted in a cylindrical bag configuration up to a plateau of 400 mm2 in most subjects. In patients with achalasia distensibility of the esophagogastric junction was reduced even when sphincter pressure was in the normal range. In patients with eosinophilic esophagitis distensibility was decreased at the esophagogastric junction and in the tubular esophagus. By contrast, in subjects with gastro-esophageal reflux disease the diameter of the esophagogastric junction was larger at any given intrabag pressure than in controls. In clinical practice impedance planimetry of the esophagus serves as a diagnostic test for the work-up of dysphagia, especially if structural or mucosal lesions are absent and peristalsis of the esophageal body is preserved. Impedance planimetry can be performed during or immediately after surgical or endoscopic procedures and is therefore a valuable tool for the ad hoc assessment of the effects of therapeutic interventions.


Lower Esophageal Sphincter Antireflux Surgery Lower Esophageal Sphincter Pressure Eosinophilic Esophagitis Mixed Connective Tissue Disease 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Kwiatek MA, Pandolfino JE, Hirano I, Kahrilas PJ (2010a) Esophagogastric junction distensibility assessed with an endoscopic functional luminal imaging probe (EndoFLIP). Gastrointest Endosc 72:272–278PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Kwiatek MA, Kahrilas K, Soper NJ, Bulsiewicz WJ, McMahon BP, Gregersen H, Pandolfino JE (2010b) Esophagogastric junction distensibility after fundoplication assessed with a novel functional luminal imaging probe. J Gastrointest Surg 14:268–276PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Kwiatek MA, Hirano I, Kahrilas PJ, Rothe J, Luger D, Pandolfino JE (2011) Mechanical properties of the esophagus in eosinophilic esophagitis. Gastroenterol 140:82–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Liacouras CA, Furuta GT, Hirano I, Atkins D, Attwood SE, Bonis PA, Burks AW, Chehade M, Collins MH, Dellon ES, Dohil R, Falk GW, Gonsalves N, Gupta SK, Katzka DA, Lucendo AJ, Markowitz JE, Noel RJ, Odze RD, Putnam PE, Richter JE, Romero Y, Ruchelli E, Sampson HA, Schoepfer A, Shaheen NJ, Sicherer SH, Spechler S, Spergel JM, Straumann A, Wershil BK, Rothenberg ME, Aceves SS (2011) Eosinophilic esophagitis: updated consensus recommendations for children and adults. J Allergy Clin Immunol 128:3–20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Nathanson LK, Brunott N, Cavallucci D (2012) Adult esophagogastric junction distensibility during general anesthesia assessed with an endoscopic functional luminal imaging probe (EndoFLIP®). Surg Endosc 26:1051–1055PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Perretta S, Dallemagne B, McMahon B, D’Agostino J, Marescaux J (2011) Video. Improving functional esophageal surgery with a “smart” bougie: Endoflip. Surg Endosc 25:3109Google Scholar
  7. Regan J, Walshe M, Rommel N, McMahon BP (2012) A new evaluation of the upper esophageal sphincter using the functional lumen imaging probe: a preliminary report. Dis Esophagus. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01331.x PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Rohof WO, Hirsch DP, Kessing BF, Boeckxstaens GE (2012) Efficacy of Treatment for Patients with Achalasia Depends on the Distensibility of the Esophagogastric Junction. Gastroenterology May 2. [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  9. Scharitzer M, Denk-Linert D (2012). Case 28. Difficult evaluation and treatment of an upper esophageal stenosis.
  10. Schoeman MN, Tippett MD, Akkermans LM, Dent J, Holloway RH (1995) Mechanisms of gastroesophageal reflux in ambulant healthy human subjects. Gastroenterol 108:83–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. van Herwaarden MA, Samsom M, Smout AJ (2000). Excess gastroesophageal reflux in patients with hiatus hernia is caused by mechanisms other than transient LES relaxations. Gastroenterology;119:1439–1446Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Motility Laboratory, Department of SurgeryMedical University of ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations