Skip to main content

Radiation Risk Associated with Lung Cancer Screening

  • Chapter

Part of the Medical Radiology book series (Med Radiol Diagn Imaging)

Abstract

Computed tomographic (CT) cancer screening has seen a steady increase in interest with the introduction of multislice CT scanners. The recent publication of the US National lung screening trial has proven a statistically significant reduction of cancer-related mortality and has boosted the discussion about the usefulness of introducing population-wide screening for lung cancer. While the potential benefits of screening are obvious, radiation dose may pose a long-term risk for the screened individual. This article describes the basis for radiation risk estimation and discusses the current dose controversy with special emphasis on CT screening for lung cancer. While there is no and probably never will be epidemiologic evidence for cancer induction in the dose range used for a single lung cancer screening examination, a non-negligible population risk cannot be ruled out considering the current evidence. Precise predictions of cancer risks are difficult because they depend heavily on the underlying statistical or radiobiologic model. While the risk of most radiation-induced cancers decreases with age, the relative risk of radiation-induced lung cancer peaks in the time interval between 40 and 70 years of age. However, if performed in a dose-conscious fashion, individual risks of lung cancer screening are very small and far outweighed by the published benefits of screening.

Keywords

  • Compute Tomographic Colonography
  • Cancer Detection Rate
  • Excess Relative Risk
  • Lung Cancer Screening
  • Colon Cancer Screening

These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/174_2011_491
  • Chapter length: 14 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-642-24535-0
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 1

References

  • Baldwin DR, Duffy SW, Wald NJ, Page R, Hansell DM, Field JK (2011) UK lung screen (UKLS) nodule management protocol: modelling of a single screen randomised controlled trial of low-dose CT screening for lung cancer. Thorax 66(4):308–313

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Becker N, Delorme S, Kauczor HU (2008) LUSI: the German component of the European trial on the efficacy of multislice-CT for the early detection of lung cancer. Onkologie 31:PO320

    Google Scholar 

  • Berrington de Gonzalez A, Darby S (2004) Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries. Lancet 363:345–351 Oxford

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchon T, Bréchot JM, Grenier PA, Ferretti GR, Lemarié E, Milleron B, Chagué D, Laurent F, Martinet Y, Beigelman-Aubry C, Blanchon F, Revel MP, Friard S, Rémy-Jardin M, Vasile M, Santelmo N, Lecalier A, Lefébure P, Moro-Sibilot D, Breton JL, Carette MF, Brambilla C, Fournel F, Kieffer A, Frija G, Flahault A, Dépiscan Group (2007) Baseline results of the depiscan study: a French randomized pilot trial of lung cancer screening comparing low dose CT scan (LDCT) and chest X-ray (CXR). Lung Cancer 58(1):50–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner DJ (2004) Radiation risks potentially associated with low-dose CT screening of adult smokers for lung cancer. Radiology 231:440–445

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner DJ, Elliston CD (2004) Estimated radiation risks potentially associated with full-body CT screening. Radiology 232:735–738

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner DJ, Georgsson MA (2005) Mass screening with CT colonography: should the radiation exposure be of concern? Gastroenterology 129:328–337

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner DJ, Doll R, Goodhead DT, Hall EJ, Land CE, Little JB, Lubin JH, Preston DL, Preston RJ, Puskin JS, Ron E, Sachs RK, Samet JM, Setlow RB, Zaider M (2003) Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: assessing what we really know. Proc Natl Acad Sci (PNAS) 100:13761–13766

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cardinale L, Cortese G, Borasio P, Dogliotti L, Ferraris F, Novello S, Perotto F, Scagliotti G, Fava C (2005) Low dose CT in early lung cancer diagnosis: prevalence data. Radiol Med 110(5–6):532–543

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chong S, Lee KS, Chung MJ, Kim TS et al (2005) Lung cancer screening with low-dose helical CT in Korea: experiences at the samsung medical center. J Korean Med Sci 20(3):402–408

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen BI (2002) Cancer risk from low level radiation. AJR 179:1137–1143

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crispo A, Brennan P, Jöckel KH et al (2004) The cumulative risk of lung cancer among current, ex- and never-smokers in European men. Br J Cancer 91(7):1280–1286

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Detterbeck FC, Boffa DJ, Tanoue LT (2009) The new lung cancer staging system. Chest 136:260–271

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Diederich S, Thomas M, Semik M, Lenzen H, Roos N, Weber A, Heindel W, Wormanns D (2004) Screening for early lung cancer with low-dose spiral computed tomography: results of annual follow-up examinations in asymptomatic smokers. Eur Radiol 14(4):691–702

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Feinendegen LE (2005) Evidence for beneficial low level radiation effects and radiation hormesis. Br J Radiol 78(925):3–7

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ford MB, Sigurdson AJ, petrulis ES et al (2003) Effect of smoking and radiotherapy on lung carcinoma in breast cancer survivors. Cancer 98:1457–1464

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gergely I, Neumann C, Reiger F, Dorffner R (2005) Lung nodule detection with ultra-low-dose CT in routine follow-up of cancer patients. Rofo 177(8):1077–1083

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert ES, Stovall M, Gospodarowicz M et al (2003) Lung cancer after treatment for Hofgkin’s disease: focus on radiation effects. Radiat Res 159:151–173

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Godoy MC, Naidich DP (2009) Subsolid pulmonary nodules and the spectrum of peripheral adenocarcinomas of the lung: recommended interim guidelines for assessment and management. Radiology 253(3):606–622, Review

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gohagan J, Marcus P, Fagerstrom R, Pinsky P, Kramer B, Prorok P, Writing Committee, Lung Screening Study Research Group (2004) Baseline findings of a randomized feasibility trial of lung cancer screening with spiral CT scan vs chest radiograph: the lung screening study of the national cancer institute. Chest 126(1):114–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman LR, Lipchik RJ, Kuzo RS, Liu Y, McAuliffe TL, O’Brien DJ (2000) Subsequent pulmonary embolism: risk after a negative helical CT pulmonary angiogram—prospective comparison with scintigraphy. Radiology 215:535–542

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hendrick RE (2010) Radiation doses and cancer risks from breast imaging studies. Radiology 257:246–253

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Henschke CI, McCauley DI, Yankelevitz DF et al (1999) Early lung cancer action project: overall design and findings from baseline screening. Lancet 354:99–105

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Honda O, Yanagawa M, Inoue A et al (2011) Image quality of multiplanar reconstruction of pulmonary CT scans using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. Br J Radiol 84(1000):335–341

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hu XH, Ding XF, Wu RZ, Zhang MM (2011) Radiation dose of non-enhanced chest CT can be reduced 40% by using iterative reconstruction in image space. Clin Radiol 66(11):1023–1029

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Infante M, Cavuto S, Lutman FR, Brambilla G, Chiesa G, Ceresoli G, Passera E, Angeli E, Chiarenza M, Aranzulla G, Cariboni U, Errico V, Inzirillo F, Bottoni E, Voulaz E, Alloisio M, Destro A, Roncalli M, Santoro A, Ravasi G, DANTE Study Group (2009) A randomized study of lung cancer screening with spiral computed tomography: three-year results from the DANTE trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 180(5):445–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Jett RJ (2005) Limitations of screening for lung cancer with low-dose spiral computed tomography. Clin Cancer Res 11:4988s–4992s

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kachelriess M, Watzke O, Kalender WA (2001) Generalized multi-dimensional adaptive filtering for conventional and spiral single-slice, multi-slice, and cone-beam CT. Med Phys 28:475–490

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kalender WA, Wolf H, Suess C, Gies M, Greess H, Bautz WA (1999) Dose reduction in CT by on-line tube current control: principles and validation on phantoms and cadavers. Eur Radiol 9(2):323–328

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kalra MK, Rizzo S, Maher MM, Halpern EF, Toth TL, Shepard JA, Aquino SL (2005) Chest CT performed with Z-axis modulation: scanning protocol and radiation dose. Radiology 237:303–308

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer BS, Berg CD, Aberle DR, Prorok PC (2011) Lung cancer screening with low-dose helical CT: results from the national lung screening trial (NLST). J Med Screen 18(3):109–111

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Little JB (1999) Induction of genetic instability by ionizing radiation. C R Acad Sci III 322:127–134

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lopes Pegna A, Picozzi G, Mascalchi M, Maria Carozzi F, Carrozzi L, Comin C, Spinelli C, Falaschi F, Grazzini M, Innocenti F, Ronchi C, Paci E, ITALUNG Study Research Group (2009) Design, recruitment and baseline results of the ITALUNG trial for lung cancer screening with low-dose CT. Lung Cancer 64(1):34–40

    Google Scholar 

  • MacRedmond R, McVey G, Lee M, Costello RW, Kenny D, Foley C, Logan PM (2006) Screening for lung cancer using low dose CT scanning: results of 2 year follow up. Thorax 61(1):54–56

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus PM, Bergstralh EJ, Zweig MH et al (2006) Extended lung cancer incidence follow-up in the Mayo lung project and overdiagnosis. J Nat Cancer Inst 98:748–756

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mascalchi M, Belli G, Zappa M et al (2006) Risk-Benefit analysis of X-ray exposure associated with lung cancer screening in the ITALUNG CT trial. AJR 187:421–429

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Melamad MR, Flehinger BJ, Zaman MB et al (1984) Screening for lung cancer; results of the Memorial Sloan Kettering study in New York. Chest 86:44–53

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Menezes RJ, Roberts HC, Paul NS, McGregor M, Chung TB, Patsios D, Weisbrod G, Herman S, Pereira A, McGregor A, Dong Z, Sitartchouk I, Boerner S, Tsao MS, Keshavjee S, Shepherd FA (2010) Lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography in at-risk individuals: the Toronto experience. Lung Cancer 7(2):177–183

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mettler FA, Bhargavan M, Faulkner K et al (2009) Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose and comparison with other radiation sources—1950–2007. Radiology 253:520–531

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mulkens TH, Bellinck P, Baeyaert M, Ghysen D, Van Dijck X, Mussen E, Venstermans C, Termote JL (2005) Use of an automatic exposure control mechanism for dose optimization in multi-detector row CT examinations: clinical evaluation. Radiology 237(1):213–223

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • National Lung Screening Trial Research Team (2011) The national lung screening trial: overview and study design. Radiology 258:243–253

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1990) Committee on the biological effects of ionizing radiations. Health effects of exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR V. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council Committee on the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiations (2005) Health effects of exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council of the National Academics (2006) Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation. BEIR VII, phase 2—Committee to assess health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation. National Academic Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Nawa T, Nakagawa T, Kusano S, Kawasaki Y, Sugawara Y, Nakata H (2002) Lung cancer screening using low-dose spiral CT: results of baseline and 1-year follow-up studies. Chest 122(1):15–20

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • New York Early Lung Cancer Action Project Investigators (2007) CT screening for lung cancer: diagnoses resulting from the New York early lung cancer action project. Radiology 243(1):239–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Pastorino U (2010) Lung cancer screening (mini review). Br J Cancer 102:1681–1686

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pastorino U, Bellomi M, Landoni C, De Fiori E, Arnaldi P, Picchio M, Pelosi G, Boyle P, Fazio F (2003) Early lung-cancer detection with spiral CT and positron emission tomography in heavy smokers: 2-year results. Lancet 362(9384):593–597

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pastorino U (2006) Early detection of lung cancer. Respiration 73(1):5–13

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen JH, Ashraf H, Dirksen A, Bach K, Hansen H, Toennesen P, Thorsen H, Brodersen J, Skov BG, Døssing M, Mortensen J, Richter K, Clementsen P, Seersholm N (2009) The Danish randomized lung cancer CT screening trial—overall design and results of the prevalence round. J Thorac Oncol 4(5):608–614

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce DA, Preston DL (2000) Radiation-related cancer risks at low doses among atomic bomb survivors. Radiat Res 154:178–186

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pontana F, Pagniez J, Flohr T et al (2011) Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (Part 1): evaluation of image noise reduction in 32 patients. Eur Radiol 21(3):627–635

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Preston DL, Ron E, Tokuoka S, Funamoto S, Nishi N, Soda M, Mabuchi K, Kodama K (2007) Solid cancer incidence in atomic bomb survivors: 1958–1998. Radiat Res 168(1):1–64

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening (2011) The national lung screening trial research team. NEJM 365:395–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Swensen SJ, Jett JR, Hartman TE, Midthun DE, Mandrekar SJ, Hillman SL, Sykes AM, Aughenbaugh GL, Bungum AO, Allen KL (2005) CT screening for lung cancer: five-year prospective experience. Radiology 235(1):259–265

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson DE, Mabuchi K, Ron E et al (1994) Cancer incidence in atomiv bomb survivors. Part II. Solid tumors, 1958–1987. Rad Res 137(suppl 2):S17–S67

    CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tokarskaya ZB, Scott BR, Zhuntova GV et al (2002) Interaction of radiation and smoking in lung cancer induction among workers at the Mayak nuclear enterprise. Health Phys 83:833–846

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tubiana M, Feinendegen LE, Yang C, Kamisnki JM (2009) The linear no-threshold is inconsistent with radiation biologic and experimental data. Radiology 251:13–22

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Vaino H, Bianchini F (eds) (2002) International agency for the research on Cancer. Breast cancer screening handbook of cancer prevention, vol 7. International Agency for the Research on Cancer, Lyon, pp 91–107

    Google Scholar 

  • van Klaveren RJ, Oudkerk M, Prokop M, Scholten ET, Nackaerts K, Vernhout R, van Iersel CA, van den Bergh KA, van‘t Westeinde S, van der Aalst C, Thunnissen E, Xu DM, Wang Y, Zhao Y, Gietema HA, de Hoop BJ, Groen HJ, de Bock GH, van Ooijen P, Weenink C, Verschakelen J, Lammers JW, Timens W, Willebrand D, Vink A, Mali W, de Koning HJ (2009) Management of lung nodules detected by volume CT scanning. N Engl J Med 361(23):2221–2229

    PubMed  CrossRef  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Veronesi G, Bellomi M, Mulshine JL, Pelosi G, Scanagatta P, Paganelli G, Maisonneuve P, Preda L, Leo F, Bertolotti R, Solli P, Spaggiari L (2008) Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography: a non-invasive diagnostic protocol for baseline lung nodules. Lung Cancer 61(3):340–349

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Xu DM, Gietema H, de Koning H et al (2006) Nodule management protocol of the Nelson randomized lung cancer screening trial. Lung Cancer 54:177–184

    PubMed  CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cornelia Schaefer-Prokop .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schaefer-Prokop, C., van Muiswinkel, K., Prokop, M. (2011). Radiation Risk Associated with Lung Cancer Screening. In: Tack, D., Kalra, M., Gevenois, P. (eds) Radiation Dose from Multidetector CT. Medical Radiology(). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/174_2011_491

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/174_2011_491

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-24534-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-24535-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)