MR-Guided Breast Interventions

  • Karin Hellerhoff
  • Clemens Cyran
Part of the Medical Radiology book series (MEDRAD)


With the use of diagnostic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the breast, MR-guided minimally invasive interventions are increasingly needed to obtain histologic proof of lesions that are occult on mammography and ultrasonography. MR-guided interventions are time-consuming and expensive; therefore, it is necessary to ensure that diagnostic MR examination of the referring institution establishing the indication for biopsy is of high quality. Assuming accurate patient selection, percutaneous MR-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy is a safe and accurate method for the evaluation of even small enhancing breast lesions. Up to now, imaging of the biopsy procedure itself has not been possible owing to lack of compatibility of the biopsy needle. Careful review of imaging and pathologic findings is therefore recommended. Several newly developed MR-compatible devices will allow more precise placement and imaging of the biopsy needle. Procedure times will be reduced. For localization of additional enhanced lesions in patients with breast carcinoma referred for operation, preoperative wire localization remains a widespread safe and simple method. Compared to percutaneous biopsy, minimally invasive therapeutic procedures are in the preclinical stage of development. MR-guided focused ultrasound surgery—because it is completely noninvasive—seems to be the most promising technique and may have the potential to become an alternative modality for the local treatment of breast tumors. However, the data are preliminary and further research with large-scale long-term clinical trials is necessary.


Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia Radial Scar Lobular Neoplasia Background Parenchymal Enhancement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. American College of Radiology (2003) Breast imaging reporting, data system atlas (BI-RADS atlas), 4th edn. American College of Radiology, RestonGoogle Scholar
  2. Braun M, Pölcher M, Schrading S et al (2007) Influence of preoperative MRI on the surgical management of patients with operable breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 29:179–87Google Scholar
  3. Brennan SB, Sung JS, Dershaw DD, Liberman L, Morris EA (2011) Cancellation of MR-imaging guided breast biopsy due to lesion nonvisualization: frequency and follow-up. Radiology 261:92–99PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Daniel BL, Birdwell RL, Butts K et al (2001) Freehand iMRI guided large-gauge core needle biopsy: a new minimally invasive technique for diagnosis of enhancing breast lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging 13:896–902PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Daniel BL, Freeman LJ, Pyzoha JM et al (2005) An MRI-compatible semiautomated vacuum-assisted breast biopsy system: initial feasibility study. J Magn Reson Imaging 21:637–644PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Eby PR, Lehman CD (2008) Magnetic resonance imaging-guided breast interventions. Top Magn Reson Imaging 19:151–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E (1998) Magnetic resonance guided localizaion and biopsy of suspicious breast lesions. Top Magn Reson Imaging 9:44–59PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fischer U, Schwethelm L, Baum FT, Luftner-Nagel S, Teubner J (2009) Effort, accuracy and histology of MR-guided vacuum biopsy of suspicious breast lesions–retrospective evaluation after 389 interventions. Fortschr Rontgenstr 181:774–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Floery D, Duenkelmeyer M, Jaromi S et al (2006) Evaluation of vacuum-assisted biopsy devices for MR-guided breast interventions. Fortschr Rontgenstr 178Google Scholar
  10. Furusawa H (2010) MRgFUS of early breast cancer: efficacy and safety in excisionless study. In: 2nd international symposium MR-guided focused ultrasoundGoogle Scholar
  11. Gianfelice D, Khiat A, Amara M et al (2003) MR imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery of breast cancer: correlation of contrast-enhanced breast MRI with histopathologic findings. Breast Cancer Res Treat 82:93–101PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gombos EC, Kacher DF, Furusawa H, Namba K (2006) Breast focused ultrasound surgery with magnetic resonance guidance. Top Mag Reson Imaging 17:181–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hefler L, Casselman J, Amaya B et al (2003) Follow-up of breast lesions detected by MRI not biopsied due to absent enhancement of contrast medium. Eur Radiol 13:346–433Google Scholar
  14. Heinig A, Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Viehweg P et al (1997) Value of contrast medium magnetic resonance tomography of the breast in breast reconstruction with implant. Radiologe 37:710–717PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hellerhoff K, Schlossbauer T, Herzog P, Reiser M (2008) Interventional MRI of the breast Indications, technique, results and perspectives. Radiologe 4:367–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Heinig A, Pickuth D et al (2000) Interventional MRI of the breast: lesion localisation and biopsy. Eur Radiol 10:36–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Heinig A, Schaumlöffel U et al (1999) MR-guided percutaneous excisional and incisional biopsy of breast lesions. Eur Radiol 9:1656–1665PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Huynh AT, Viehweg P, Hanke W, Requardt H, Paprosch I (1994) Prototype breast coil for MR-guided needle localisation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 18:876–881PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Huber PE, Jenne JW, Rastert R et al (2001) A new noninvasive approach in breast cancer therapy using magnetic-resonance imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery. Cancer Res 61:8441–8447PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Kuhl CK (2002) Interventional breast MRI: needle localisation and core biopsies. Exp Clin Cancer Res 21:65–67Google Scholar
  21. Hynynen K, Pomeroy O, Smith DN et al (2001) MR imaging-guided focused ultrasound surgery of fibroadenomas in the breast: a feasibility study. Radiology 219:176–185PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kuhl C, Elevelt A, Leutner C, Gieseke J, Pakos E, Schild H (1997a) Interventional breast MR imaging: clinical use of a stereotactic localisation and biopsy device. Radiology 204:667–675PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Kuhl CK, Bieling HB, Gieseke J et al (1997b) Healthy premenopausal breast parenchyma in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: normal contrast medium enhancement and cyclical-phase dependency. Radiology 203:137–144PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kuhl CK, Kuhn W, Braun M et al (2007) Pre-operative staging of breast cancer with breast MRI: one step forward, two steps back? Breast 6(Suppl 2):34–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kuhl CK, Morakkabati N, Leutner CC et al (2001) MR imaging–guided large-core (14-Gauge) needle biopsy of small lesions visible at breast MR imaging alone. Radiology 220:31–39PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Kuhl CK, Schmutzler RK, Leutner CC et al (2000) Breast MR imaging screening in 192 women proved or suspected to be carriers of a breast cancer susceptibility gene: preliminary results. Radiology 215:267–279PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Weigel S et al (2005) The “EVA” trial: evaluation of the efficacy of diagnostic methods (mammography, ultrasound, MRI) in the secondary and tertiary prevention of familial breast cancer preliminary results after the first half of the study period. Fortschr Rontgenstr 177(6):818–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. LaTrenta LR, Menell JH, Morris EA et al (2003) Breast lesions detected with MR imaging: utility and histopathologic importance of identification with US. Radiology 227:856–861PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee J, Kaplan J, Murray M et al (2007) Underestimation of DCIS at MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:468–474PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lehman CD, Aikawa T (2004) MR-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: accuracy of targeting and success in sampling in a phantom model. Radiology 232:911–914PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Kuhl CK et al (2007a) MRI Evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med 356:1295–1303PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lehman CD, Isaacs C, Schnall MD (2007b) Cancer yield of mammography, MR, and US in high-risk women: prospective multi-institution breast cancer screening study. Radiology 244(2):381–388PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Liberman L, Bracero N, Morris E et al (2005) MRI guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: initial clinical experience. AJR Am J Roentgenol185:183–193PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Liberman L, Holland AE, Marjan D et al (2007) Underestimation of atypical ductal hyperplasia at MRI-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:684–690PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Meeuwis C, Veltman J, van Hall HN et al (2011) MR-guided breast biopsy at 3 T: diagnostic yield of large core needle biopsy compared with vacuum-assisted biopsy. Eur Radiol (in press)Google Scholar
  36. Morin J, Traore A, Dionne G et al (2004) Magnetic resonance-guided percutaneous cryosurgery of breast carcinoma: technique and early clinical results. Can J Surg 47:347–351PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Morris EA, Liberman L, Dershaw DD et al (2002) Preoperative MR imaging-guided needle localization of breast lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:1211–1220PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Orel S, Rosen M, Mies C et al (2005) MR-Imaging-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted core-needle breast biopsy: initial experience. Radiology 238:54–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Orel SG, Weinstein SP, Schnall MD (1999) Breast MR Imaging in patients with axillary lymph node metastases and unknown primary malignancy. Radiology 212(5):543–549PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Perlet C, Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Heinig A et al (2006) Magnetic Resonance-guided, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy. Results from a European multicenter study of 538 lesions. Cancer 106:982–990PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Perlet C, Sittek H, Reiser M et al (2005) Clip marker placement following MR-guided vacuum biopsy of the breast. Radiologe 45:230–236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Postma EL, van Hillegersberg R, Daniel BL et al (2011) MRI-guided ablation of breast cancer: where do we stand today? J Magn Reson Imaging 34:254–261PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Prat X, Sittek H, Heinig A (2002) European quadricentric evaluation of a breast MR biopsy and localisation device: technical improvements based on phase I evaluation. Eur Radiol 12:1720–1727PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rosen E, Baker J, Soo M (2003) Accuracy of a collagen-plug biopsy site marking device deployed after stereotactic core needle breast biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol181:1295–1299PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Schneider JP, Schulz T, Horn LC et al (2002) MR-guided percutaneous core biopsy of small breast lesions: first experience with a vertically open 0.5T scanner. J Magn Reson Imaging 15:374–385PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sittek H, Linsmeier E, Perlet C et al (2000) Preoperative marking and biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions with a guidance system for the open magnetom. Radiologe 40:1098–1105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. van den Bosch M, Daniel B, Rieke V et al (2008) MRI-guided radiofreqency ablation of breast cancer: preliminary clinical experience. J Magn Reson Imaging 27:204–208PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Viehweg P, Heinig A, Lampe D et al (1998) Retrospective analysis for evaluation of the value of contrast-enhanced MRI in patients with breast conversative therapy. MAGMA 7:141–152PubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Zippel DB, Papa MZ (2005) The use of MR imaging guided focused ultrasound in breast cancer patients: a preliminary phase one study and review. Breast Cancer 12:32–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Clinical RadiologyUniversity of Munich, Campus GrosshadernMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations