Radiation Dose: Records and Audits

  • Tessa S. Cook
  • William W. Boonn
  • Woojin Kim
Part of the Medical Radiology book series (MEDRAD)


As the utilization of computed tomography has grown in the past decade, so has the interest in being able to monitor doses of ionizing radiation received by patients. Until recently, the biggest obstacle to dose monitoring was the image-based dose sheet on which dose-related parameters are stored. While development of a new radiation dose structured report will promote dose monitoring and reporting in the future, a vast repository of legacy data with image-based dose sheets still exists worldwide. In this chapter, we discuss the challenges faced in CT dose monitoring as well as some solutions that have been developed to overcome the limitations of the image-based dose sheet. We also address the steps involved in designing and implementing an institutional dose monitoring program, and participation in regional and national dose registries. Finally, we discuss the recent advances in organ dose estimation using Monte Carlo simulations.


Compute Tomography Examination Compute Tomography Dose Compute Tomography Dose Index Dose Monitoring DICOM Header 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Amis JES, Butler PF, Applegate KE, Birnbaum SB, Brateman LF, Hevezi JM, Mettler FA, Morin RL, Pentecost MJ, Smith GG, Strauss KJ, Zeman RK (2007) American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine. JACR 4:272–284Google Scholar
  2. Barnes E (2011) Valkyrie software rides to rescue of CT radiation dose dilemma. Accessed October 31
  3. Bogdanich W, Ruiz RR (2010) FDA to increase oversight of medical radiation. New York TimesGoogle Scholar
  4. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography: an increasing source of radiation exposure. NEJM 357(22):2277–2284PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brenner DJ, McCollough C, Orton CG (2006) Is it time to retire the CTDI for CT quality assurance and dose optimization? Med Phys 33:1189–1191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brink JA, Amis ES (2010) Image wisely: a campaign to increase awareness about adult radiation protection. Radiology 257(3):601–602PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brink M, de Lange F, Oostveen LJ, Dekker HM, Kool DR, Deunk J, Edwards MJR, van Kuijk C, Kamman RL, Blickman JG (2008) Arm raising at exposure-controlled multidetector trauma ct of thoracoabdominal region: higher image quality, lower radiation dose. Radiology 249(2):661–670PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brody A, Frush D, Huda W, Brent R (2007) Radiation risk to children from computed tomogoraphy. Pediatrics 120(3):677PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cheng P (2011) CT Dose Retriever. Accessed September 15
  10. Clunie DA (2011) PixelMed Java DICOM Toolkit. Accessed March 1
  11. Clunie DA (2011) How to Use DoseUtility. Accessed September 15, 2011
  12. Congressional Subcommittee on Health: Medical radiation: an overview of the issues. medical-radiation-an-overview-of-the-issues&catid=132: subcommittee-on-health&Itemid=72 (February 26, 2010). Accessed March 1, 2010
  13. Cook TS, Zimmerman S, Maidment ADA, Kim W, Boonn WW (2010) Automated extraction of radiation dose information for CT examinations. J Am Coll Rad 7(11):871–877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cook TS, Kim W, Boonn WW (2011) Integrated, On-Demand Retrieval of Cumulative CT Dose Estimates at the Workstation During Image Interpretation. In: SIIMGoogle Scholar
  15. Cristy M (1980) Mathematical phantoms representing children of various ages for use in estimates of internal dose. Tech. Rep. NUREG/CR-1159, United States Nuclear Regulatory CommissionGoogle Scholar
  16. de Gonzalez AB, Mahesh M, Kim K, Bhargavan M, Lewis R, Mettler F, Land C (2009) Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the united states in (2007). Arch Intern Med 169(22):2071–2077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. DICOM (2007) Standards Committee: DICOM Standard Supplement 127: CT radiation dose reportingGoogle Scholar
  18. DICOM (2008) Standards Committee: DICOM Standard Part 16: content mapping resourceGoogle Scholar
  19. Dose Index Registry (2011) Accessed September 15
  20. GOCR. http:/ Accessed March 1, 2010
  21. Goske M, Applegate K, Boylan J, Butler P, Callahan M, Coley B, Farley S, Frush D, Hernanz-Schulman M, Jaramillo D et al (2008a) The Image Gentlycampaign: increasing CT radiation dose awareness through a national education and awareness program. Pediatr Radiol 38(3):265–269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Goske M, Applegate K, Boylan J, Butler P, Callahan M, Coley B, Farley S, Frush D, Hernanz-Schulman M, Jaramillo D et al (2008b) The Image Gentlycampaign: increasing CT radiation dose awareness through a national education and awareness program. Pediatr Radiol 38(3):265–269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F et al (2009) Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA 301:500–507PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Huda W, Mettler FA (2011) Volume CT dose index and dose-length product displayed: what good are they? Radiology 258:236–242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Huda W, Vance A (2007) Patient radiation doses from adult and pediatric CT. Am J Roentgenol 188(2):540–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hurwitz LM, Yoshizumi TT, Goodman PC, Frush DP, Nguyen G, Toncheva G, Lowry C (2007) Effective dose determination using an anthropomorphic phantom and metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor technology for clinical adult body multidetector array computed tomography protocols. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31(4):544–549PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. ICRP (1990) Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiologic Protection. ICRP Publication 60. Ann. ICRP 21(1–3)Google Scholar
  28. ICRP (2007) The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiologic Protection. ICRP Publication 103. Ann. ICRP 37(2-4)Google Scholar
  29. Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, Hamberg LM, Blake MA, Shepard J, Saini S (2004) Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization 230(3):619–628Google Scholar
  30. Kase KR et al. (2009) Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States. Tech. Rep. 160, National Council of Radiation ProtectionGoogle Scholar
  31. Landro L (2010) Radiation risks prompt push to curb CT scans. Wall Street JournalGoogle Scholar
  32. Levin DC, Rao VM, Parker L, Frangos AJ, Sunshine JH (2008) Recent trends in utilization rates of abdominal imaging: the relative roles of radiologists and nonradiologist physicians. JACR 5:744–747PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Li X, Segars WP, Samei E, Sturgeon GM, Colsher JG, Frush DP (2008) Patient-specific dose estimation for pediatric chest CT. Med Phys 35:5821–5828PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Li X, Samei E, Segars WP, Sturgeon GM, Colsher JG, Toncheva G, Yoshizumi TT, Frush DP (2011) Patient-specific radiation dose and cancer risk estimation in CT: part II application to patients. Med Phys 38:408–419PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Luaces M, Akers S, Litt H (2009) Low kVp imaging for dose reduction in dual-source cardiac CT. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 25:165–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maitino AJ, Levin DC, Parker L, Rao VM, Sunshine JH (2003) Nationwide trends in rates of utilization of noninvasive diagnostic imaging among the medicare population between 1993 and 1999. Radiology 227:113–117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Martin D, Semelka R (2006) Health effects of ionising radiation from diagnostic CT. Lancet 367(9524):1712–1714PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McCollough CH, Leng S, Yu L, Cody DD, Boone JM, McNitt-Gray MF (2011) CT dose index and patient dose: they are not the same thing. Radiology 259(2):311–316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Menke J (2006) Comparison of different body size parameters for individual dose adaptation in body CT of adults. Radiology 236:565–571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. National Radiology Data Registry (2011) Accessed September 15
  41. Neumann RD, Bluemke DA (2010) Tracking radiation exposure from diagnostic imaging devices at the NIH. JACR 7(2):87–89PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Quality Improvement Registry for CT Scans in Children (2011) Accessed September 15
  43. Radiation Exposure Monitoring (2010) Accessed March 15
  44. SB (2011) 1237–Radiation control: health facilities and clinics: records. Accessed September 15
  45. Sinclair WK, Adelstein SJ, Carter MW, Harley JH, Moeller DW (1987) Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States. Tech. Rep. 93, National Council of Radiation ProtectionGoogle Scholar
  46. Size-Specific Dose Estimates (SSDE) (2011) Pediatric and Adult Body CT Examinations. Tech. Rep. TG-204, American Association of Physicists in MedicineGoogle Scholar
  47. Smith-Bindman R, Lipson J, Marcus R, Kim KP, Mahesh M, Gould R, de Gonzalez AB, Miglioretti DL (2009) Radiation dose associated with common computed tomography examinations and the associated lifetime attributable risk of cancer. Arch Intern Med 169(22):2078–2086PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tack D, Gevenois PA (2008) Efforts for lowering radiation dose delivered with CT: raising arms, or is there more? Radiology 249(2):413–415PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Turner AC, Zankl M, DeMarco JJ, Cagnon CH, Zhang D, Angel E, Cody DD, Stevens DM, McCollough CH, McNitt-Gray MF (2010) The feasibility of a scanner-independent technique to estimate organ dose from MDCT scans: using CTDIvol to account for differences between scanners. Med Phys 37(4):1816–1825PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Warden GI (2011) GROK–Generalized Radiation Observation Kit. Accessed September 15
  51. White Paper: Initiative to Reduce Unnecessary Radiation Exposure from Medical Imaging (2010) Accessed March 15

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hospital of the University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations