Advertisement

General Conclusions

  • J. Bogaert
  • S. Dymarkowski
  • A. M. Taylor
  • V. Muthurangu
Part of the Medical Radiology book series (MEDRAD)

Abstract

Since 2004 when the first edition of this textbook was published, there have been no ‘major’ leaps in the field on cardiovascular MRI. This is in contrast to the previous decade with for example the advent of the contrast-enhanced delayed/late enhancement imaging technique, which provided a paradigm shift in the assessment of cardiac diseases. However, over the last decade, cardiovascular MRI has matured and become an established rather than an emerging technique in many areas of cardiovascular imaging. To some extent this has shifted the focus from exploring the potential of MRI to unravel and understand cardiac diseases towards determining standardized protocols for cardiovascular MRI including structured reporting, defining appropriateness criteria, as well as recommendations for training and accreditation in the field. In this concluding chapter, these issues will be emphasized.

Keywords

Congenital Heart Disease Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Coronary Artery Stenos Appropriateness Criterion Cardiac Imaging Technique 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bruder O, Schneider S, Nothnagel D et al (2009) EuroCMR (European cardiovascular magnetic resonance) registry. Results of the German pilot phase. J Am Coll Cardiol 54:1457–1466PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Douglas PS, Hendel RC, Cummings JE et al (2009) ACCF/ACR/AHA/ASE/ASNC/HRS/NASCI/RSNA/SAIP/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR 2008 Health policy statement on structured reporting in cardiovascular imaging. Circulation 119:187–200PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fraser AG, Buser PT, Bax JJ et al (2006) The future of cardiovascular imaging and non-invasive diagnosis. A joint statement from the European association of echocardiography, the working groups on cardiovascular magnetic resonance, computers in cardiology, and nuclear cardiology, of the European society of cardiology, the European association of nuclear medicine, and the association for European paediatric cardiology. Eur Heart J 27:1750–1753PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM et al (2006) ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 Appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 48:1475–1797PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hendel RC, Budoff MJ, Cardella JF et al (2009) ACC/AHA/ACR/ASE/ASNC/HRS/NASCI/RSNA/SAIP/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/SIR 2008 Key data elements and definitions for cardiac imaging: a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force and clinical data standards (writing committee to develop clinical data standards for cardiac imaging). Circulation 119:154–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hundley WG, Bluemke D, Bogaert JG et al (2009) Society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance guidelines for reporting cardiovascular magnetic resonance examinations. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 11:5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hundley WG, Bluemke DA, Finn JP et al (2010) ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 Expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance. A report of the American college of cardiology foundation task force on expert consensus documents. Circulation 121:2462–2508PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kilner PJ, Geva T, Kaemmerer H, Trindade PT, Schwitter J, Webb GD (2010) Recommendations for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in adults with congenital heart disease from the respective working groups of the European society of cardiology. Eur Heart J 31:794–805PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kramer CM, Barkhausen J, Flamm SD, Kim RJ, Nagel E (2008) Standardized cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) protocols, society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance: board of trustees task force on standardized protocols. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 10:35PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Pennell DJ, Sechtem UP, Higgins CB et al (2004) Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): consensus panel report. Eur Heart J 25:1940–1965PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Plein S, Schulz-Menger J, Almeida A et al (2011) Training and accreditation in cardiovascular magnetic resonance in Europe: a position statement of the working group on cardiovascular magnetic resonance of the European society of cardiology. Eur Heart J 32:793–798PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pohost GM, Kim RJ, Manning WJ (2008) Task force 12: training in advanced cardiovascular imaging (cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR)) Endorsed by the society for cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol 51:408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Thomas JD, Zoghbi WA, Beller GA et al (2008) ACCF 2008 Training statement on multimodality noninvasive cardiovascular imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 53:125–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wagner A, Bruder O, Schneider S, et al (2010) Current variables, definitions and endpoints of the European cardiovascular magnetic resonance registry. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 11:43CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Bogaert
    • 1
  • S. Dymarkowski
    • 1
  • A. M. Taylor
    • 2
  • V. Muthurangu
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging Research Center (MIRC)University Hospitals Gasthuisberg, Catholic University of LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.Centre for Cardiovascular ImagingUCL Institute of Cardiovascular Science and Great Ormond Street Hospital for ChildrenLondonUK

Personalised recommendations