Imaging of Acute Appendicitis in Adults: Radiography

  • Ronald L. Eisenberg
Part of the Medical Radiology book series (MEDRAD)


The clinical symptoms of acute appendicitis can be so characteristic that there is no difficulty in making the correct diagnosis. In some patients, however, the clinical findings may be obscure or minimal. In these patients, imaging studies may be required to make a correct diagnosis and permit prompt surgical intervention before perforation occurs. Today, this is accomplished rapidly and accurately by ultrasound and computed tomography. In the past, abdominal radiography has traditionally been considered an essential part of the workup of patients presenting with acute abdominal pain. Although it has a low diagnostic yield, this procedure is still frequently performed in patients with abdominal pain suggestive of acute appendicitis to detect abnormal bowel gas patterns or an appendicolith. There is no current indication for barium enema examination for acute appendicitis, but a short presentation of this technique provides younger readers an idea of how appendicitis was diagnosed before the age of cross-sectional imaging.


Acute Appendicitis Pelvic Inflammatory Disease Abdominal Radiograph Abdominal Radiography Appendiceal Abscess 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The author expresses thanks to Wolters Kluwer Publishers for permitting him to use illustrations from their book, Gastrointestinal Radiology: A Pattern Approach (4th edition). Philadelphia: Lippincott, 2002.


  1. Ahn SH, Mayo-Smith WW, Murphy BL et al (2002) Acute nontraumatic abdominal pain in adult patients: abdominal radiography compared with CT evaluation. Radiology 225:159–164PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Benjaminov O, Atri M, Hamilton P, Rappaport D (2002) Frequency of visualization and thickness of normal appendix at nonenhanced helical CT. Radiology 225:400–406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Daly CP, Cohan RH, Francis IR, Caoili EM, Ellis JH, Nan B (2005) Incidence of acute appendicitis in patients with equivocal CT findings. AJR 184:1813–1820PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Eisenberg RL (2008) The role of abdominal radiography in the evaluation of the nontrauma emergency patient: new thoughts on an old problem. Radiology 248:715–716PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jacobs JE, Balthazar EJ (2008) Diseases of the appendix. In: Gore RM, Levine MS (eds). Textbook of gastrointestinal radiology, 3rd edn. Saunders, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  6. Kellow Z, Macinnes M, Kurzebcwyg D et al (2008) The role of abdominal radiography in the evaluation of the nontrauma emergency patient. Radiology 248:887–893PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lane MJ, Liu DM, Huynh MD, Jeffrey RB Jr, Mindelzun RE, Katz DS (1999) Suspected acute appendicitis: nonenhanced helical CT in 300 consecutive patients. Radiology 213:341–346PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Pereira JM, Sirlin CB, Pinto PS, Jeffrey RB, Stella DL, Casola G (2004) Disproportionate fat stranding: a helpful CT sign in patients with acute abdominal pain. Radiographics 24:703–715PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of RadiologyBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center—Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations