Advertisement

Appendicitis Perforation Rates and Time Interval between Symptom Onset and Surgery

  • Tehillah S. Menes
  • Nina A. Bickell
Chapter
Part of the Medical Radiology book series (MEDRAD)

Abstract

This chapter examines the evidence on the association between time to treatment and perforation rates. Time to treatment is divided into two components; patient time, which is the time from symptom onset to presentation to healthcare system and system time which includes time delays between presentation and definitive treatment. While patient time is associated with increased perforation rates and worse outcomes, poor effects of system delays are less consistently shown, likely because total time duration between symptom onset and treatment is not taken into account, timing has not been accurately documented, and possibly due to different disease processes for perforated and non-perforated appendicitis. The impact of increased use of CT for the diagnosis of appendicitis on delay and perforation rates is discussed.

Keywords

Symptom Onset Acute Appendicitis Acute Abdominal Pain Perforated Appendicitis Perforation Rate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Andersson R, Hugander A, Thulin A et al (1994) Indications for operation in suspected appendicitis and incidence of perforation. BMJ 308:107–110PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Antevil JL, Rivera L, Langenberg BJ et al (2006) Computed tomography-based clinical diagnostic pathway for acute appendicitis: prospective validation. J Am Coll Surg 203:849–856PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Applegate KE, Sivit CJ, Salvator AE et al (2001) Effect of cross-sectional imaging on negative appendectomy and perforation rates in children. Radiology 220:103–107PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Ascheim DD, Gelijns AC, Rose EA (2009) Innovation with experience using implantable left ventricular assist devices. Circ Heart Fail 2:1–2PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Augustin T, Bhende S, Chavda K et al (2009) CT scans and acute appendicitis: a five-year analysis from a rural teaching hospital. J Gastrointest Surg 13:1306–1312PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bendeck SE, Nino-Murcia M, Berry GJ, Jeffrey RB Jr (2002) Imaging for suspected appendicitis: negative appendectomy and perforation rates. Radiology 225:131–136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berry J Jr, Malt RA (1984) Appendicitis near its centenary. Ann Surg 200:567–575PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bickell NA, Siu AL (2001) Why do delays in treatment occur? Lessons learned from ruptured appendicitis. Health Serv Res 36:1–5PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bickell NA, Rojas M, Anderson RM, Chatterjee S, Leventhal H (2004) What takes so long for my patient to get treated? JGIM 19(1):217Google Scholar
  10. Bickell NA, Aufses AH Jr, Rojas M, Bodian C (2006) How time affects the risk of rupture in appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg 202:401–406PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bratton SL, Haberkern CM, Waldhausen JH (2000) Acute appendicitis risks of complications: age and medicaid insurance. Pediatrics 106:75–78PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Braveman P, Schaaf VM, Egerter S et al (1994) Insurance-related differences in the risk of ruptured appendix. N Engl J Med 331:444–449PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brender JD, Marcuse EK, Koepsell TD, Hatch EI (1985) Childhood appendicitis: factors associated with perforation. Pediatrics 76:301–306PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Cacioppo JC, Diettrich NA, Kaplan G, Nora PF (1989) The consequences of current constraints on surgical treatment of appendicitis. Am J Surg 157:276–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cappendijk VC, Hazebroek FW (2000) The impact of diagnostic delay on the course of acute appendicitis. Arch Dis Child 83:64–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Deng Y, Chang DC, Zhang Y et al (2010) Seasonal and day of the week variations of perforated appendicitis in US children. Pediatr Surg Int 26:691–696PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ditillo MF, Dziura JD, Rabinovici R (2006) Is it safe to delay appendectomy in adults with acute appendicitis? Ann Surg 244:656–660PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eldar S, Nash E, Sabo E et al (1997) Delay of surgery in acute appendicitis. Am J Surg 173:194–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Flum DR, Morris A, Koepsell T, Dellinger EP (2001) Has misdiagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time? A population-based analysis. JAMA 286:1748–1753PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gadomski A, Jenkins P (2001) Ruptured appendicitis among children as an indicator of access to care. Health Serv Res 36:129–142PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Groetsch SM, Shaughnessy JM (2001) Medical management of acute appendicitis: a case report. J Am Board Fam Pract 14:225–226PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hong JJ, Cohn SM, Ekeh AP et al (2003) A prospective randomized study of clinical assessment versus computed tomography for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 4:231–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hunter JG (2010) Letting weary surgeons sleep and saving money. Arch Surg 145:892PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ingraham AM, Cohen ME, Bilimoria KY et al (2010) Effect of delay to operation on outcomes in adults with acute appendicitis. Arch Surg 145:886–892PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jones PF (2001) Suspected acute appendicitis: trends in management over 30 years. Br J Surg 88:1570–1577PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kasl SV (1975) Social-psychological characteristics associate with behaviors which reduce cardiovascular risk. Applying behavioral science to cardiovascular risk: proceedings of a conference (Edited by Enelow AJ and Henderson JB. Seattle, WA. American Heart Association, Dallas (TX), 173–190Google Scholar
  27. Kirscht JP (1974) The health belief model and illness behavior. Health Educ Monogr 2:387–408Google Scholar
  28. Körner H, Söndenaa K, Söreide JA et al (1997) Incidence of acute nonperforated and perforated appendicitis: age-specific and sex-specific analysis. World J Surg 21:313–317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Körner H, Söndenaa K, Söreide JA (2001) Perforated and non-perforated acute appendicitis–one disease or two entities? Eur J Surg 167:525–530PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kraemer M, Kremer K, Leppert R et al (1999) Perforating appendicitis: is it a separate disease? Acute abdominal pain study group. Eur J Surg 165:473–480PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee SL, Walsh AJ, Ho HS (2001) Computed tomography and ultrasonography do not improve and may delay the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. Arch Surg 136:556–562PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Linz DN, Hrabovsky EE, Franceschi D, Gauderer MW (1993) Does the current health care environment contribute to increased morbidity and mortality of acute appendicitis in children? J Pediatr Surg 28:321–326PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Livingston EH, Woodward WA, Sarosi GA, Haley RW (2007) Disconnect between incidence of nonperforated and perforated appendicitis: implications for pathophysiology and management. Ann Surg 245:886–892PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Luckmann R (1989) Incidence and case fatality rates for acute appendicitis in California. A population-based study of the effects of age. Am J Epidemiol 129:905–918PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Mason RJ (2008) Surgery for appendicitis: is it necessary? Surg Infect (Larchmt) 9:481–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mathis RD, Chiumento AB, Yeh B, Dollieslager N (2005) An outcome study of the use of computed tomography for the diagnosis of appendicitis in a community-based emergency department. South Med J 98:1169–1172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McDonald GP, Pendarvis DP, Wilmoth R, Daley BJ (2001) Influence of preoperative computed tomography on patients undergoing appendectomy. Am Surg 67:1017–1021PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. McLean AD, Stonebridge PA, Bradbury AW et al (1993) Time of presentation, time of operation, and unnecessary appendicectomy. BMJ 306:307PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Menes TS, Aufses AH Jr, Rojas M, Bickell NA (2006) Increased use of computed tomography does not harm patients with acute appendicitis. Am Surg 72:326–329PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Musunuru S, Chen H, Rikkers LF, Weber SM (2007) Computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: definitive or detrimental? J Gastrointest Surg 11:1417–1421PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Naoum JJ, Mileski WJ, Daller JA et al (2002) The use of abdominal computed tomography scan decreases the frequency of misdiagnosis in cases of suspected appendicitis. Am J Surg 184:587–589PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Omundsen M, Dennett E (2006) Delay to appendicectomy and associated morbidity: a retrospective review. ANZ J Surg 76:153–155PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Peña BM, Taylor GA, Fishman SJ, Mandl KD (2002) Effect of an imaging protocol on clinical outcomes among pediatric patients with appendicitis. Pediatrics 110:1088–1093PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Perez J, Barone JE, Wilbanks TO et al (2003) Liberal use of computed tomography scanning does not improve diagnostic accuracy in appendicitis. Am J Surg 185:194–197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pittman-Waller VA, Myers JG, Stewart RM et al (2000) Appendicitis: why so complicated? Analysis of 5755 consecutive appendectomies. Am Surg 66:548–554PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Redmond JM, Smith GW, Wilasrusmee C, Kittur DS (2002) A new perspective in appendicitis: calculation of half time (T (1/2)) for perforation. Am Surg 68:593–597PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Riesenman PJ, Riesenman KP, Stone TJ et al (2008) Nonfocused enhanced CT evaluation of acute appendicitis increases length of stay in the emergency department but does not increase perforation rate. Am Surg 74:488–492PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Rosenstock IM (1966) Why people use health services. Millbank Mem Fund Q 44:94–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rosenstock IM (1974) Historical origins of the health belief model. Health Educ Monogr 2:328–335Google Scholar
  50. Safer MA, Tharps QJ, Jackson TC, Leventhal H (1979) Determinants of three stages of delay in seeking care at a medical clinic. Med Care 17:11–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Savrin RA, Clatworthy HW Jr (1979) Appendiceal rupture: a continuing diagnostic problem. Pediatrics 63:36–43PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. SCOAP Collaborative, Cuschieri J, Florence M, Flum DR et al (2008) Negative appendectomy and imaging accuracy in the Washington state surgical care and outcomes assessment program. Ann Surg 248:557–563PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Sicard N, Tousignant P, Pineault R, Dubé S (2007) Non-patient factors related to rates of ruptured appendicitis. Br J Surg 94:214–221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Surana R, Quinn F, Puri P (1993) Is it necessary to perform appendicectomy in the middle of the night in children? BMJ 306:1168PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Temple CL, Huchcroft SA, Temple WJ (1995) The natural history of appendicitis in adults. A prospective study. Ann Surg 221:278–281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ting HH, Bradley EH, Wang Y et al (2008) Delay in presentation and reperfusion therapy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Med 121:316–323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Torbati SS, Guss DA (2003) Impact of helical computed tomography on the outcomes of emergency department patients with suspected appendicitis. Acad Emerg Med 10:823–829PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. van Breda Vriesman AC, Kole BJ, Puylaert JB (2003) Effect of ultrasonography and optional computed tomography on the outcome of appendectomy. Eur Radiol 13:2278–2282PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Von Titte S, McCabe CJ, Ottinger LW (1996) Delayed appendectomy for appendicitis: causes and consequences. Am J Emerg Med 14:620–622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Walker SJ, West CR, Colmer MR (1995) Acute appendicitis: does removal of a normal appendix matter, what is the value of diagnostic accuracy and is surgical delay important? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 77:358–363PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Webb S, Holman D (1992) A survey of infertility, surgical sterility and associated reproductive disability in Perth, Western Australia. Aust J Public Health 16:376–381PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Weyant MJ, Eachempati SR, Maluccio MA et al (2001) The use of computed tomography for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in children does not influence the overall rate of negative appendectomy or perforation. Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2:19–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wong KK, Cheung TW, Tam PK (2008) Diagnosing acute appendicitis: are we overusing radiologic investigations? J Pediatr Surg 43:2239–2241PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yaghoubian A, de Virgilio C, Chiu V, Lee SL (2010) “July effect” and appendicitis. J Surg Educ 67:157–160PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Yardeni D, Hirschl RB, Drongowski RA et al (2004) Delayed versus immediate surgery in acute appendicitis: do we need to operate during the night? J Pediatr Surg 39:464–469PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Departments of Health Evidence and Policy and MedicineMount Sinai Medical CenterNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of SurgeryTel Aviv Sourasky Medical CenterTel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations