Gradients in Ultra High Field (UHF) MRI

Part of the Medical Radiology book series (MEDRAD)


The gradients are one of the three magnetic field generating units that are necessary to make MRI work. While the other two types of fields are directly affected by the strength of the main magnet—the static magnetic field, B o , and the RF (radio frequency) fields by the Larmor frequency depending linear on the static magnetic field strength—the same set of gradients is able to work at any static field strength. The principle design goals for gradients in UHF are the same as in standard MRI. Nevertheless, it is advisable to adapt the gradient system to the challenging working conditions in an UHF environment.


Lorentz Force Static Magnetic Field Pulse Width Modulation Gradient System Acoustic Noise 


Gradients General

  1. Chapman BLW (2006) Gradients: the heart of the MRI machine. Curr Med Imag Rev 2:131–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Schmitt F, Stehling MK, Turner R (1998) Echo-planar imaging: theory, technique and application. 141–178Google Scholar


  1. Mueller OM, Roemer P, Park JN, Souza SP (1991) A general purpose non-resonant gradient power system. Proceedings of the 10th Annual Scientific Meeting of the SMRM, San Francisco, p 130Google Scholar
  2. Ideler KH, Nowak S, Borth G, Hagen U, Hausmann R, Schmitt F (1992) A resonant multi purpose gradient power switch for high performance imaging. Proceedings of the 11th Annual Scientific Meeting of the SMRM, Berlin, p 4044Google Scholar
  3. Schmitt F, Arz W, Eberlein E, et al. (1998) An ultra-high performance gradient system for cardiac and neuro MR Imaging. Proceedings of the ISMRM, p 470Google Scholar

GC Design

  1. FEM design: Pilsbury RD, Punchard WFB (1985) A finite element Fourier expansion technique for the design of a pulsed radial gradient system for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), IEEE transactions on magnetics, vol. Mag-21, no. 6, novemberGoogle Scholar
  2. Turner R (1986a) A target field approach to optimal coil design. J Phys D Appl Phys 19:147–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Turner R (1988) Minimum inductance coils. J Phys E Sci Instrum 21:948–952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Turner R (1993a) Gradient coil design: a review of methods. Magn Reson Imag 11:903–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Turner R (1986b) A target field approach to optimal coil design. J Phys D, Appl Phys 19:L147–L151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Turner R (1993b) Gradient coil design: a review of methods. Magn Resonance Imag 11(7):903–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Roemer P, Edelstein WA, Hickey J (1986) Self shielded gradient coils. Proceedings of the 5th Annual Meeting of the SMRM, Montreal, p 1067Google Scholar
  8. Mansfield P, Chapman B, Turner R, Bowley R (1985) Magnetic field screens. UK Patent 2 180 943 B, US Patent 4978920Google Scholar
  9. Crozier S, Forbes LK, Doddrell DM (1994)The design of transverse gradient coil of restricted length by simulated annealing. J Magn Reson, Vol A107, 126–128Google Scholar


  1. Budinger TF, Fischer H, Hentschel D, Reinfelder HE, Schmitt F (1991) Physiological effects of fast oscillating magnetic field gradients. J Comput Assist Tomogr 15:909–914PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Irnich W, Schmitt F (1995) Magnetostimulation in MRI. Magn Reson Med 33:619–623PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chronik BA, Rutt BK (2001) A comparison between human magnetostimulation thresholds in whole-body and head/neck gradient coils. Magn Reson Med 46:386–394PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Schmitt F, Wielopolski P, Fischer H, Edelman RR (1994) Peripheral Stimulation and their Relation to Gradient Pulse. Proceedings of the Society of Magnetic Resonance, p 102Google Scholar
  5. Mansfield P, Harvey PR (1993) Limits to neural stimulation in echo-planar imaging. Magn Reson Med 29:746–758PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Nyenhuis JA, Bourland JD, Schaefer DJ (1997) Analysis from a stimulation perspective of magnetic field patterns of MR gradient coils. J Appl Phys 81:4314–4316CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lorentz Forces-Mechanics-Vibration-Noise

  1. Haiying L, Junxiao L (1996) Gradient coil mechanical vibration and image quality degradation. Proceedings of the Society of Magnetic Resonance, pg 1393Google Scholar
  2. Chapman BLW, Mansfield P (1995) Quiet gradient coils: Active acoustically and magnetically screened distribuited transverse gradient designs. Meas Sci Technol 6:349–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hedeen RA, Edelstein W (1996) Characterization and prediction of gradient acoustic noise in MR imagers. Proceedings of the Society of Magnetic Resonance, pg 1389Google Scholar
  4. Stringer M, Doty GN, Shevgoor S, Xiao C, Laws N, Staab JP, Wald L, Ackerman JL, Doty FD (2005) “Progress in the development of a quiet, high-performance, head gradient coil Proceedings of the Society of Magnetic Resonance 13th Annual. Meeting ISMRM, Miami, FLGoogle Scholar

Non Conventional Gradients

  1. Martens MA, Petropoulos LS, Brown RW, Andrews JH (1991) Insertable biplanar gradient coils for magnetic resonance imaging. Rev Sci Instrum 62(11):2639–2645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cho ZH, Yi JH (1991) A novel type of surface gradient coil. J Magn Reson 94:471–495Google Scholar
  3. Vegh V, Zhao H, Galloway GJ, Doddrell DM, Brereton IM (2005) The design of planar gradient coils. Part I: A winding path correction method. Concepts Magn Reson B Magn Reson Eng 27(1):17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Parker DL, Hadley JR (2006) Multiple-region gradient arrays for extended field of view, increased performance, and reduced nerve stimulation in magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 56(6):1251–1260PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Stockmann JP, Ciris PA, Galiana G,Tam L,RT Constable. O-Space Imaging: Highly Efficient Parallel Imaging Using Second-Order Nonlinear Fields as Encoding Gradients With No Phase Encoding, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 64(2): 447–456Google Scholar
  6. Hennig Juergen, Welz AnnaMasako, Schultz Gerrit, Korvink Jan, Liu Zhenyu, Speck Oliver, Zaitsev Maxim (2008) Parallel imaging in non-bijective, curvilinear magnetic field gradients: a concept study. Magn Reson Mater Phy 21:5–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hrovat MI, Pulyer YM, Rybicki FY, Patz S (1999) Reconstruction algorithm for novel ultrafast MRI. Int J Imaging Syst Technol 10:209–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Patz S, Hrovat MI, Pulyer YM, Rybicki FY (1999) Novel encoding technology for ultrafast MRI in a limited spatial region. Int J Imaging Syst Technol 10:216–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar


  1. Koch KM, Rothman DL,de Graaf RA (2009) Optimization of static magnetic field homogeneity in the human and animal brain in vivo. Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy 54: 69–96Google Scholar
  2. Chen CN, Hoult DI (2005) Biomedical Magnetic Resonance Technology. Adam Hilger, New York (Iron shiming)Google Scholar
  3. Neuberth G (2005) US Patent 6,897,750. (Iron shimming)Google Scholar
  4. Hetherington HP, Chu W-J, Gonen O, Pan JW (2010) Robust fully automated shimming of the human brain for high-field 1 h spectroscopic imagingGoogle Scholar
  5. Gruetter R, Boesch C (1992) Fast not iterative shimming of spatially localize signals. In vivo analysis of magnetic field long axis. J Magn Reson 96:323–334Google Scholar
  6. Gruetter R (1993) Automatic localized in vivo adjustment of all first and second order shim coils. Magn Reson Med 29:804–811PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Shen J, Rothman DL, Hetherington HP, Pan JW (1999) Linear projection method for automatic slice shimming. Magn Reson Med 42:1082–1088PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Siemens AG H IM MRUniversity FreiburgFreiburgGermany

Personalised recommendations