Advertisement

Volume CT of Acute Abdomen: Acquisition and Reconstruction Techniques

  • Samuel Mérigeaud
  • Ingrid Millet
  • Fernanda Curros-Doyon
  • Patrice Taourel
Part of the Medical Radiology book series (MEDRAD)

Abstract

Along with the development of MDCT, the rapidity of volumic acquisition over the entire abdomen and pelvis has allowed to tailor acquisition protocols to diagnosis indications and etiologic hypotheses of acute abdomen. Furthermore, advances in computer technology (hardware and software) have allowed fast post processing of large volume of data over extended areas using reconstruction algorithms. This chapter is thus aimed at detailing each steps from CT data acquisition to volumetric reconstruction techniques and their practical applications in CT studies of the acute abdomen.

Keywords

Acute Appendicitis Maximum Intensity Projection Volume Rendering Acute Abdomen Virtual Endoscopy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Anderson SW, Soto JA, Lucey BC, Ozonoff A, Jordan JD, Ratevosian J, Ulrich AS, Rathlev NK, Mitchell PM, Rebholz C, Feldman JA, Rhea JT (2009) Abdominal 64-MDCT for suspected appendicitis: the use of oral and IV contrast material versus IV contrast material only. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193(5):1282–1288PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arac M, Celik H, Oner AY, Gultekin S, Gumus T, Kosar S (2005) Distinguishing pelvic phleboliths from distal ureteral calculi: thin-slice CT findings. Eur Radiol 15(1):65–70PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aufort S, Charra L, Lesnik A, Bruel J, Taourel P (2005) Multidetector CT of bowel obstruction: value of post-processing. Eur Radiol 15(11):2323–2329PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Calhoun PS, Kuszyk BS, Heath DG, Carley JC, Fishman EK (1999) Three-dimensional volume rendering of spiral CT data: theory and method. Radiographics 19(3):745–764PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Candocia FJ, Goldman I (2005) Three-dimensional computed tomography illustration of small bowel obstruction transition points in patients receiving oral contrast: report of 3 cases. J Comput Assist Tomogr 29(2):202–204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dalrymple NC, Prasad SR, Freckleton MW, Chintapalli KN (2005) Informatics in radiology (infoRAD): introduction to the language of three-dimensional imaging with multidetector CT. Radiographics 25(5):1409–1428PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dearing DD, Recabaren JA, Alexander M (2008) Can computed tomography scan be performed effectively in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis without the added morbidity of rectal contrast? Am Surg 74(10):917–920PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Delabrousse E (2009) TDM des urgences abdominales. Masson, ParisGoogle Scholar
  9. Duran C, Uraz S, Kantarci M, Ozturk E, Doganay S, Dayangac M, Bozkurt M, Yuzer Y, Tokat Y (2009) Hepatic arterial mapping by multidetector computed tomographic angiography in living donor liver transplantation. J Comput Assist Tomogr 33(4):618–625PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ernst O, Bulois P, Saint-Drenant S, Leroy C, Paris JC, Sergent G (2003) Helical CT in acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Eur Radiol 13(1):114–117PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ertl-Wagner BB, Bruening R, Blume J, Hoffmann RT, Mueller-Schunk S, Snyder B, Reiser MF (2006) Relative value of sliding-thin-slab multiplanar reformations and sliding-thin-slab maximum intensity projections as reformatting techniques in multisection CT angiography of the cervicocranial vessels. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27(1):107–113PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Fishman EK, Ney DR, Heath DG, Corl FM, Horton KM, Johnson PT (2006) Volume rendering versus maximum intensity projection in CT angiography: what works best, when, and why. Radiographics 26(3):905–922PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ghekiere O, Lesnik A, Millet I, Hoa D, Guillon F, Taourel P (2007) Direct visualization of perforation sites in patients with a non-traumatic free pneumoperitoneum: added diagnostic value of thin transverse slices and coronal and sagittal reformations for multi-detector CT. Eur Radiol 17(9):2302–2309PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gollub MJ (2005) Multidetector computed tomography enteroclysis of patients with small bowel obstruction: a volume-rendered “surgical perspective”. J Comput Assist Tomogr 29(3):401–407PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hidas G, Eliahou R, Duvdevani M, Coulon P, Lemaitre L, Gofrit ON, Pode D, Sosna J (2010) Determination of renal stone composition with dual-energy CT: in vivo analysis and comparison with X-ray diffraction. Radiology 257(2):394–401PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hong SS, Kim AY, Byun JH, Won HJ, Kim PN, Lee MG, Ha HK (2006) MDCT of small-bowel disease: value of 3D imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187(5):1212–1221PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huynh LN, Coughlin BF, Wolfe J, Blank F, Lee SY, Smithline HA (2004) Patient encounter time intervals in the evaluation of emergency department patients requiring abdominopelvic CT: oral contrast versus no contrast. Emerg Radiol 10(6):310–313PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Jaeckle T, Stuber G, Hoffmann MH, Freund W, Schmitz BL, Aschoff AJ (2008a) Acute gastrointestinal bleeding: value of MDCT. Abdom Imaging 33(3):285–293PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jaeckle T, Stuber G, Hoffmann MH, Jeltsch M, Schmitz BL, Aschoff AJ (2008b) Detection and localization of acute upper and lower gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding with arterial phase multi-detector row helical CT. Eur Radiol 18(7):1406–1413PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jaffe TA, Martin LC, Thomas J, Adamson AR, DeLong DM, Paulson EK (2006) Small-bowel obstruction: coronal reformations from isotropic voxels at 16-section multi-detector row CT. Radiology 238(1):135–142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jan YT, Yang FS, Huang JK (2005) Visualization rate and pattern of normal appendix on multidetector computed tomography by using multiplanar reformation display. J Comput Assist Tomogr 29(4):446–451PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johnson PT, Heath DG, Hofmann LV, Horton KM, Fishman EK (2003) Multidetector-row computed tomography with three-dimensional volume rendering of pancreatic cancer: a complete preoperative staging tool using computed tomography angiography and volume-rendered cholangiopancreatography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 27(3):347–353PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Johnson PT, Horton KM, Mahesh M, Fishman EK (2006) Multidetector computed tomography for suspected appendicitis: multi-institutional survey of 16-MDCT data acquisition protocols and review of pertinent literature. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30(5):758–764PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Johnson PT, Horton KM, Fishman EK (2009a) Nonvascular mesenteric disease: utility of multidetector CT with 3D volume rendering. Radiographics 29(3):721–740PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Johnson PT, Horton KM, Kawamoto S, Eng J, Bean MJ, Shan SJ, Fishman EK (2009b) MDCT for suspected appendicitis: effect of reconstruction section thickness on diagnostic accuracy, rate of appendiceal visualization, and reader confidence using axial images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192(4):893–901PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kaewlai R, Nazinitsky KJ (2007) Acute colonic diverticulitis in a community-based hospital: CT evaluation in 138 patients. Emerg Radiol 13(4):171–179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kambadakone AR, Eisner BH, Catalano OA, Sahani DV (2010) New and evolving concepts in the imaging and management of urolithiasis: urologists’ perspective. Radiographics 30(3):603–623PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kamel IR, Liapi E, Fishman EK (2005) Liver and biliary system: evaluation by multidetector CT. Radiol Clin North Am 43(6):977–997PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ketelslegers E, Van Beers BE (2006) Urinary calculi: improved detection and characterization with thin-slice multidetector CT. Eur Radiol 16(1):161–165PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kim JK, Kim JH, Bae SJ, Cho KS (2004) CT angiography for evaluation of living renal donors: comparison of four reconstruction methods. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183(2):471–477PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Kim HC, Yang DM, Jin W, Park SJ (2008) Added diagnostic value of multiplanar reformation of multidetector CT data in patients with suspected appendicitis. Radiographics 28(2):393–405 discussion 405-396PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kim YJ, Kim JE, Kim HS, Hwang HY (2009) MDCT with coronal reconstruction: clinical benefit in evaluation of suspected acute appendicitis in pediatric patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192(1):150–152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lane MJ, Katz DS, Mindelzun RE, Jeffrey RB Jr (1997) Spontaneous intramural small bowel haemorrhage: importance of non-contrast CT. Clin Radiol 52(5):378–380PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lee KH, Kim YH, Hahn S, Lee KW, Lee HJ, Kim TJ, Kang SB, Shin JH, Park BJ (2006a) Added value of coronal reformations for duty radiologists and for referring physicians or surgeons in the CT diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Korean J Radiol 7(2):87–96PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lee SY, Coughlin B, Wolfe JM, Polino J, Blank FS, Smithline HA (2006b) Prospective comparison of helical CT of the abdomen and pelvis without and with oral contrast in assessing acute abdominal pain in adult emergency department patients. Emerg Radiol 12(4):150–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Macari M, Balthazar EJ (2003) The acute right lower quadrant: CT evaluation. Radiol Clin North Am 41(6):1117–1136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mun S, Ernst RD, Chen K, Oto A, Shah S, Mileski WJ (2006) Rapid CT diagnosis of acute appendicitis with IV contrast material. Emerg Radiol 12(3):99–102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Neville AM, Paulson EK (2009) MDCT of acute appendicitis: value of coronal reformations. Abdom Imaging 34(1):42–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nino-Murcia M, Jeffrey RB Jr, Beaulieu CF, Li KC, Rubin GD (2001) Multidetector CT of the pancreas and bile duct system: value of curved planar reformations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176(3):689–693PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Parrish FJ (2007) Volume CT: state-of-the-art reporting. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189(3):528–534PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Patel U, Walkden RM, Ghani KR, Anson K (2009) Three-dimensional CT pyelography for planning of percutaneous nephrostolithotomy: accuracy of stone measurement, stone depiction and pelvicalyceal reconstruction. Eur Radiol 19(5):1280–1288PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Paulson EK, Harris JP, Jaffe TA, Haugan PA, Nelson RC (2005) Acute appendicitis: added diagnostic value of coronal reformations from isotropic voxels at multi-detector row CT. Radiology 235(3):879–885PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Perandini S, Faccioli N, Zaccarella A, Re T, Mucelli RP (2010) The diagnostic contribution of CT volumetric rendering techniques in routine practice. Indian J Radiol Imaging 20(2):92–97PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Pinto Leite N, Pereira JM, Cunha R, Pinto P, Sirlin C (2005) CT evaluation of appendicitis and its complications: imaging techniques and key diagnostic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol 185(2):406–417PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Rao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, Mostafavi AA, Lawrason JN, McCabe CJ (1997) Helical CT combined with contrast material administered only through the colon for imaging of suspected appendicitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169(5):1275–1280PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Rao ND, Gulati MS, Paul SB, Pande GK, Sahni P, Chattopadhyay TK (2005) Three-dimensional helical computed tomography cholangiography with minimum intensity projection in gallbladder carcinoma patients with obstructive jaundice: comparison with magnetic resonance cholangiography and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 20(2):304–308PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rezazadeh Azar A, Abraham C, Coulier B, Broze B (2010) Ileocecal herniation through the foramen of Winslow: MDCT diagnosis. Abdom Imaging 35(5):574–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Seo H, Lee KH, Kim HJ, Kim K, Kang SB, Kim SY, Kim YH (2009) Diagnosis of acute appendicitis with sliding slab ray-sum interpretation of low-dose unenhanced CT and standard-dose i.v. contrast-enhanced CT scans. AJR Am J Roentgenol 193(1):96–105PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stabile Ianora AA, Moschetta M, Lorusso V, Scardapane A (2010) Atypical appendicitis: diagnostic value of volume-rendered reconstructions obtained with 16-slice multidetector-row CT. Radiol Med 115(1):93–104PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sun Z (2006) 3D multislice CT angiography in post-aortic stent grafting: a pictorial essay. Korean J Radiol 7(3):205–211PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Thoeni RF, Cello JP (2006) CT imaging of colitis. Radiology 240(3):623–638PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Urban BA, Fishman EK (2000a) Tailored helical CT evaluation of acute abdomen. Radiographics 20(3):725–749PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Urban BA, Fishman EK (2000b) Targeted helical CT of the acute abdomen: appendicitis, diverticulitis, and small bowel obstruction. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 21(1):20–39PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Weltman DI, Yu J, Krumenacker J Jr, Huang S, Moh P (2000) Diagnosis of acute appendicitis: comparison of 5- and 10-mm CT sections in the same patient. Radiology 216(1):172–177PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Wildermuth S, Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Marincek B (2005) Multislice CT in the pre- and postinterventional evaluation of mesenteric perfusion. Eur Radiol 15(6):1203–1210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Samuel Mérigeaud
    • 1
  • Ingrid Millet
    • 2
  • Fernanda Curros-Doyon
    • 2
  • Patrice Taourel
    • 2
  1. 1.Hôpital LapeyronieMontpellierFrance
  2. 2.Department of ImagingCHU Montpellier, Hospital LapeyronieMontpellier Cedex 5France

Personalised recommendations