Structural Abnormalities of the Female Reproductive Tract

Part of the Medical Radiology book series (MEDRAD)


The true incidence of structural abnormalities of the female reproductive tract in paediatric and adolescent patients is difficult to determine. The term “structural abnormality” encompasses a wide spectrum of anatomical anomalies, which, depending on the precise anomalies present, have a varied temporal and clinical presentation. Imaging assessment of these abnormalities often requires a multi-modality approach with the methods employed being modified depending on the clinical presentation and age of the patient. Classification of structural genital abnormalities is not standardized, with several different schema proposed. Ultimately good communication between clinical and radiological multidisciplinary team members is vital to ensure that there is unambiguous interpretation of the spectrum of abnormalities in a given patient and best care delivered.


Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia Structural Anomaly Urogenital Sinus Vaginal Septum Bicornuate Uterus 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



Fast low angle single shot


Spin echo


Turbospin echo


Fast imaging with steady-state precession


Three dimensional




Multi-detector computed tomography


Two dimensional


Magnetic resonance imaging




Cerebrospinal fluid


Short tau inversion recovery


Magnetic resonance angiography


American society of reproductive Medicine


Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome


Vagina, Cervix, Uterus, Adenxa and associated Malformations


Müllerian duct aplasia, renal aplasia and cervical somite dysplasia


Genital renal ear and skeletal syndrome


Herlyn–Werner–Wunderlich syndrome


Oestrogen diethylstibisterol


  1. Acien P (1992) Embryological observations on the female genital tract. Hum Reprod 7:437–445PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Acien P, Arminana E, Garcia-Ontiveros E (1987) Unilateral renal agenesis associated with ipsilateral blind vagina. Arch Gynecol 240:1–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Acien P, Acien M, Sanchez-Ferrer M (2004) Complex malformations of the female genital tract. New types and revision of classification. Hum Reprod 19:2377–2384PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Adams ME, Hiorns MP, Wilcox DT (2006) Combining MDCT, micturating cystography, and excretory urography for 3D imaging of cloacal malformation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 187:1034–1035PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baughman SM, Richardson RR, Podberesky DJ et al (2007) 3-Dimensional magnetic resonance genitography: a different look at cloacal malformations. J Urol 178:1675–1678; discussion 1678–1679Google Scholar
  6. Biason-Lauber A, Konrad D, Navratil F et al (2004) A WNT4 mutation associated with Mullerian-duct regression and virilization in a 46, XX woman. N Engl J Med 351:792–798PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Biason-Lauber A, De Filippo G, Konrad D et al (2007) WNT4 deficiency—a clinical phenotype distinct from the classic Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome: a case report. Hum Reprod 22:224–229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Blask AR, Sanders RC, Rock JA (1991) Obstructed uterovaginal anomalies: demonstration with sonography. Part II. Teenagers. Radiology 179:84–88PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown MA (2006) MR imaging of benign uterine disease. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 14:439–453PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buttram VC, Gibbons WE (1979) Müllerian anomalies: a proposed classification (an analysis of 144 cases). Fertil Steril 32:40–46PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Byrne J, Nussbaum-Blask A, Taylor WS et al (2000) Prevalence of Müllerian duct anomalies detected at ultrasound. Am J Med Genet 94:9–12PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carrington BM, Hricak H, Nuruddin RN et al (1990) Müllerian duct anomalies: MR imaging evaluation. Radiology 176:715–720PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Deutch TD, Abuhamad AZ (2008) The role of 3-dimensional ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of Mullerian duct anomalies: a review of the literature. J Ultrasound Med 27:413–423PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Deutch T, Bocca S, Oehninger S et al (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging versus three-dimensional transvaginal ultrasound for the diagnosis of Müllerian anomalies. Fertil Steril 86:S308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dick EA, de Bruyn R, Patel K et al (2001) Spinal ultrasound in cloacal exstrophy. Clin Radiol 56:289–294PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Duncan PA, Shapiro LR, Stangel JJ et al (1979) The MURCS association: Mullerian duct aplasia, renal aplasia, and cervicothoracic somite dysplasia. J Pediatr 95:399–402PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fedele L, Ferrazzi E, Dorta M et al (1988) Ultrasonography in the differential diagnosis of “double” uteri. Fertil Steril 50:361–364PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gholoum S, Puligandla PS, Hui T et al (2006) Management and outcome of patients with combined vaginal septum, bifid uterus, and ipsilateral renal agenesis (Herlyn-Werner-Wunderlich syndrome). J Pediatr Surg 41:987–992PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haddad B, Barranger E, Paniel BJ (1999) Blind hemivagina: long-term follow-up and reproductive performance in 42 cases. Hum Reprod 14:1962–1964PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heinonen PK, Saarikoski S, Pystynen P (1982) Reproductive performance of women with uterine anomalies. An evaluation of 182 cases. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 61:157–162PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hendren WH, Crawford JD (1969) Adrenogenital syndrome: the anatomy of the anomaly and its repair. Some new concepts. J Pediatr Surg 4:49–58PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Homer HA, Li TC, Cooke ID (2000) The septate uterus: a review of management and reproductive outcome. Fertil Steril 73:1–14PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Humphries PD, Simpson JC, Creighton SM et al (2008) MRI in the assessment of congenital vaginal anomalies. Clin Radiol 63:442–448PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hung YH, Tsai C, Ou C et al (2008) Late prenatal diagnosis of hydrometrocolpos secondary to a cloacal anomaly by abdominal ultrasonography with complementary magnetic resonance imaging. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 47:79–83PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Imaoka I, Wada A, Matsuo M et al (2003) MR imaging of disorders associated with female infertility: use in diagnosis, treatment, and management. Radiographics 23:1401–1421PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jaramillo D, Lebowitz RL, Hendren WH (1990) The cloacal malformation: radiologic findings and imaging recommendations. Radiology 177:441–448PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Jordan BK, Mohammed M, Ching ST et al (2001) Up-regulation of WNT-4 signaling and dosage-sensitive sex reversal in humans. Am J Hum Genet 68:1102–1109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kopac M, Riccabona M, Haim M (2009) Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography and genitography in a baby with ambiguous genitalia and urogenital sinus. Ultraschall Med 30:299–300PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kupešić S, Kurjak A, Skenderovic S et al (2002) Screening for uterine abnormalities by three-dimensional ultrasound improves perinatal outcome. J Perinat Med 30:9–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lang IM, Babyn PS, Oliver GD (1999) MR imaging of paediatric uterovaginal anomalies. Pediatr Radiol 29:163–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Letterie GS, Haggerty M, Lindee G (1995) A comparison of pelvic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging as diagnostic studies for Müllerian tract abnormalities. Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud 40:34–38PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Maneschi F, Marana R, Muzii L et al (1993) Reproductive performance in women with bicornuate uterus. Acta Eur Fertil 24:117–120PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Marten K, Vosshenrich R, Funke M et al (2003) MRI in the evaluation of Mullerian duct anomalies. Clin Imaging 27:346–350PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nahum GG (1998) Uterine anomalies. How common are they, and what is their distribution among subtypes? J Reprod Med 43:877–887PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Nazir Z, Rizvi RM, Qureshi RN et al (2006) Congenital vaginal obstructions: varied presentation and outcome. Pediatr Surg Int 22:749–753PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Olive DL, Henderson DY (1987) Endometriosis and Mullerian anomalies. Obstet Gynecol 69:412–415PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Olpin JD, Heilbrun M (2009) Imaging of Müllerian duct anomalies. Clin Obstet Gynecol 52:40–56PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Oppelt P, Renner SP, Brucker S et al (2005) The VCUAM (Vagina Cervix Uterus Adnex-associated Malformation) classification: a new classification for genital malformations. Fertil Steril 84:1493–1497PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Oppelt P, Renner SP, Kellerman A et al (2006) Clinical aspects of Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuester-Hauser syndrome: recommendations for clinical diagnosis and staging. Hum Reprod 21:792–797PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Oppelt P, von Have M, Paulsen M et al (2007) Female genital malformations and their associated abnormalities. Fertil Steril 87:335–342PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Orazi C, Lucchetti MC, Schingo PMS et al (2007) Herlyn-Werner-Wunderlich syndrome: uterus didelphys, blind hemivagina and ipsilateral renal agenesis. Sonographic and MR findings in 11 cases. Pediatr Radiol 37:657–665PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pellerito JS, McCarthy SM, Doyle MB et al (1992) Diagnosis of uterine anomalies: relative accuracy of MR imaging, endovaginal sonography, and hysterosalpingography. Radiology 183:795–800PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Picone O, Laperelle J O, Sonigo P et al (2007) Fetal magnetic resonance imaging in the antenatal diagnosis and management of hydrocolpos. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30:105–109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Prader A (1954) Genital findings in the female pseudo-hermaphroditism of the congenital adrenogenital syndrome; morphology, frequency, development and heredity of the different genital forms. Helv Paediatr Acta 9:231–248PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Propst AM, Hill JA 3rd (2000) Anatomic factors associated with recurrent pregnancy loss. Semin Reprod Med 18:341–350PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Puscheck EE, Cohen L (2008) Congenital malformations of the uterus: the role of ultrasound. Semin Reprod Med 26:223–231PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Raga F, Bauset C, Remohi J et al (1997) Reproductive impact of congenital Müllerian anomalies. Hum Reprod 12:2277–2281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ravel C, Lorenço D, Dessolle L et al (2009) Mutational analysis of the WNT gene family in women with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. Fertil Steril 91:1604–1607PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Reuter KL, Daly DC, Cohen SM (1989) Septate versus bicornuate uteri: errors in imaging diagnosis. Radiology 172:749–752PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Rink RC, Adams MC, Misseri R (2005) A new classification for genital ambiguity and urogenital sinus anomalies. BJU Int 95:638–642PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rolen AC, Choquette AJ, Semmens JP (1966) Rudimentary uterine horn: obstetric and gynecologic implications. Obstet Gynecol 27:806–813PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Salim R, Woelfer B, Backos M et al (2003) Reproducibility of three-dimensional ultrasound diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 21:578–582PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Strubbe EH, Cremers CW, Willemsen WN et al (1994) The Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome without and with associated features: two separate entities? Clin Dysmorphol 3:192–199PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Subramanian S, Sharma R, Gamanagatti S et al (2006) Antenatal MR diagnosis of urinary hydrometrocolpos due to urogenital sinus. Pediatr Radiol 36:1086–1089PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. The American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) (1988) The American Fertility Society classifications of adnexal adhesions, distal tubal occlusion, tubal occlusion secondary to tubal ligation, tubal pregnancies, Mullerian anomalies and intrauterine adhesions. Fertil Steril 49:944–955Google Scholar
  56. Toaff ME, Lev-Toaff AS, Toaff R (1984) Communicating uteri: review and classification with introduction of two previously unreported types. Fertil Steril 41:661–679PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Warne S, Chitty LS, Wilcox DT (2002) Prenatal diagnosis of cloacal anomalies. BJU Int 89:78–81PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zurawin RK, Dietrich JE, Heard MJ et al (2004) Didelphic uterus and obstructed hemivagina with renal agenesis: case report and review of the literature. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 17:137–141PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University College London Hospital NHS TrustLondonUK

Personalised recommendations