Advertisement

Head and Neck

  • Dominik Morhard
  • Susanne Jochum
Chapter
Part of the Medical Radiology book series (MEDRAD)

Abstract

Technical improvements have established CT angiography as a standard noninvasive imaging modality for the evaluation of the vascular system of head and neck. This chapter provides information about dedicated protocols for scanning and postprocessing of DE CTA and DE virtually unenhanced NECT, with special focus on ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke as well as on evaluation of stenosis.

Keywords

Intracranial Aneurysm Maximum Intensity Projection Dual Energy Calcify Plaque Bone Removal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Barreto M, Schoenhagen P, Nair A et al (2008) Potential of dual-energy computed tomography to characterize atherosclerotic plaque: ex vivo assessment of human coronary arteries in comparison to histology. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2(4):234–242PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Buerke B, Wittkamp G, Seifarth H et al (2009) Dual-energy CTA with bone removal for transcranial arteries: intraindividual comparison with standard CTA without bone removal and TOF-MRA. Acad Radiol 16(11):1348–1355PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Das M, Braunschweig T, Mühlenbruch G, Mahnken AH et al (2009) Carotid plaque analysis: comparison of dual-source computed tomography (CT) findings and histopathological correlation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 38(1):14–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ferda J, Novak M, Mirka H et al (2009) The assessment of intracranial bleeding with virtual unenhanced imaging by means of dual-energy CT angiography. Eur Radiol 19(10):2518–2522PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hegde A, Chan LL, Tan L, Illyyas M, Lim WE (2009) Dual Energy CT and its use in neuroangiography. Ann Acad Med Singapore 38:817–820PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Lell M, Anders K, Klotz E, Ditt H, Bautz W, Tomandl BF (2006) Clinical evaluation of bone-subtraction CT angiography (BSCTA) in head and neck imaging. Eur Radiol 16:889–897PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Lell MM, Hinkmann F, Nkenke E, Schmidt B, Seidensticker P, Kalender WA, Uder M, Achenbach S. (2009) Dual energy CTA of the supraaortic arteries: Technical improvements with a novel dual source CT system. Eur J Radiol, Oct 8Google Scholar
  8. Lell MM, Kramer M, Klotz E, Villablanca P, Ruehm SG (2009b) Carotid computed tomography angiography with automated bone suppression: a comparative study between dual energy and bone subtraction techniques. Invest Radiol 44(6):322–328PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Morhard D, Fink C, Becker C, Reiser MF, Nikolaou K (2008) Value of automatic bone subtraction in cranial CT angiography: comparison of bone-subtracted vs. standard CT angiography in 100 patients. Eur Radiol 18(5):974–982PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Morhard D, Fink C, Graser A, Reiser MF, Becker C, Johnson TR (2009) Cervical and cranial computed tomographic angiography with automated bone removal: dual energy computed tomography versus standard computed tomography. Invest Radiol 44(5):293–297PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Thomas C, Korn A, Krauss B, Ketelsen D, Tsiflikas I, Reimann A, Brodoefel H, Claussen CD, Kopp AF, Ernemann U, Heuschmid M. (2009) Automatic bone and plaque removal using dual energy CT for head and neck angiography: Feasibility and initial performance evaluation. Eur J Radiol, Jun 9 Thomas C, Korn A, Krauss B et al (2009) Automatic bone and plaque removal using dual energy CT for head and neck angiography: feasibility and initial performance evaluation. Eur J RadiolGoogle Scholar
  12. Uotani K, Watanabe Y, Higashi M et al (2009) Dual-energy CT head bone and hard plaque removal for quantification of calcified carotid stenosis: utility and comparison with digital subtraction angiography. Eur Radiol 19(8):2060–2065PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Watanabe Y, Uotani K, Nakazawa T et al (2009) Dual-energy direct bone removal CT angiography for evaluation of intracranial aneurysm or stenosis: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography. Eur Radiol 19(4):1019–1024PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Zhang LJ, Wu SY, Niu JB et al (2010) Dual-energy CT angiography in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: image quality, radiation dose, and comparison with 3D rotational digital subtraction angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:23–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Clinical RadiologyUniversity of Munich, Grosshadern HospitalMunichGermany
  2. 2.Institute of RadiologyWestpfalz ClinicKaiserslauternGermany

Personalised recommendations