Skip to main content

Safety

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
High-Field MR Imaging

Part of the book series: Medical Radiology ((Med Radiol Diagn Imaging))

  • 1239 Accesses

Abstract

MR is accompanied to exposure to three different mechanisms of interaction: the main magnetic field, switched gradient fields used for spatial encoding, and the radiofrequency fields used for signal transmission. The physical mechanisms are identical to those at conventional MR. Exposure levels in UHF-MR nevertheless reach values of concern necessitating appropriate measures to ensure safety of patients, volunteers, and operating and technical personnel. This especially applies to energy deposition by radiofrequency fields. Specific absorption rate increases with frequency, at UHF-MR the problem is exacerbated by the necessity to use parallel transmission to generate homogeneous excitation. Gradient-induced peripheral nerve stimulation depends on local changes of the magnetic field, and not on the main field strength. Secondary effects like induced currents when moving in the field do become appreciable at UHF-MR and lead to sensory effects like vertigo and nausea. For both of these exposure categories the physical mechanisms are basically known, serious disagreement arises about safety margins when defining exposure levels for safe application especially with respect to induced currents. The most contentious issue relates to safety of the main field itself. There are numerous reports about interactions of magnetic fields with living tissues, but so far no known biological effects have been identified as a definite health risk at currently achievable field strengths. From a scientific point of view this seems to be good news for the safe applications of UHF-MR, but translating this lack of evidence into regulatory guidelines is a tricky and contentious issue with potential serious consequences for the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andrä W (2007) Magnetism in medicine. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC (Commission of the European Communities) (2000) Communication from the commission on the precautionary principle. CEC, Brussels, 02.02.2000, COM(2000) 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Crozier S, Trakic A et al (2007) Numerical study of currents in workers induced by body-motion around high-ultrahigh field MRI magnets. J Magn Reson Imaging 26:1261–1277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Directive 2004/40/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Feychting M (2005) Health effects of static magnetic fields—a review of the epidemiological evidence. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 87(2–3):241–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foster KR, Vecchia P, Repacholi MH (2000) Risk management. Science and the precautionary principle. Science 288(5468):979–981

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glover PM (2009) Interaction of MRI field gradients with the human body. Phys Med Biol 54(21):R99–R115

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glover PM, Bowtell R (2007) Measurement of electric fields due to time-varying magnetic field gradients using dipole probes. Phys Med Biol 52(17):5119–5130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glover PM, Cavin I et al (2007a) Magnetic-field-induced vertigo: a theoretical and experimental investigation. Bioelectromagnetics 28(5):349–361

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Glover PM, Eldeghaidy S et al (2007b) Measurement of visual evoked potential during and after periods of pulsed magnetic field exposure. J Magn Reson Imaging 26:1353–1356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ICNIRP (1994) Guidelines on limits of exposure to static magnetic-fields. Health Phys 66(1):100–106

    Google Scholar 

  • ICNIRP (1998) Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz) (vol 74, p 494, 1998). Health Phys 75(4):442–442

    Google Scholar 

  • ICNIRP, P Int Comm Non-Ionizing Radiation (2009) Guidelines on limits of exposure to static magnetic fields. Health Phys 96(4):504–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICNIRP, R Int Commission NonIonizing (2002) General approach to protection against non-ionizing radiation. Health Phys 82(4):540–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICNIRP, R Int Commission Nonionizing (2009) ICNIRP statement on the guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). Health Phys 97(3):257–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IEC (2008) Standard IEC 60601-2-33: Medical electrical equipment, International Electrotechnical Commission

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinouchi Y, Yamaguchi H et al (1996) Theoretical analysis of magnetic field interactions with aortic blood flow. Bioelectromagnetics 17(1):21–32

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschwink JL (1997) Magnetoreception—homing in on vertebrates. Nature 390(6658):339–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyakoshi J (2005) Effects of static magnetic fields at the cellular level. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 87(2–3):213–223

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reilly JP (1989) Peripheral-nerve stimulation by induced electric currents—exposure to time-varying magnetic-fields. Med Biol Eng Comput 27(2):101–110

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saunders R (2005) Static magnetic fields: animal studies. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 87(2–3):225–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schenck JF (2005) Physical interactions of static magnetic fields with living tissues. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 87(2–3):185–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simon MD, Geim AK (2000) Diamagnetic levitation: flying frogs and floating magnets (invited). J Appl Phys 87(9):6200–6204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tenforde TS (2005) Magnetically induced electric fields and currents in the circulatory system. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 87(2–3):279–288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2006) Environmental health criteria 232: static fields. Geneva, Switzerland, ISBN 92-4-157232-9

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jürgen Hennig .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hennig, J. (2012). Safety. In: Hennig, J., Speck, O. (eds) High-Field MR Imaging. Medical Radiology(). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/174_2010_133

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/174_2010_133

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-85087-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-85090-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics