Abstract
MR is accompanied to exposure to three different mechanisms of interaction: the main magnetic field, switched gradient fields used for spatial encoding, and the radiofrequency fields used for signal transmission. The physical mechanisms are identical to those at conventional MR. Exposure levels in UHF-MR nevertheless reach values of concern necessitating appropriate measures to ensure safety of patients, volunteers, and operating and technical personnel. This especially applies to energy deposition by radiofrequency fields. Specific absorption rate increases with frequency, at UHF-MR the problem is exacerbated by the necessity to use parallel transmission to generate homogeneous excitation. Gradient-induced peripheral nerve stimulation depends on local changes of the magnetic field, and not on the main field strength. Secondary effects like induced currents when moving in the field do become appreciable at UHF-MR and lead to sensory effects like vertigo and nausea. For both of these exposure categories the physical mechanisms are basically known, serious disagreement arises about safety margins when defining exposure levels for safe application especially with respect to induced currents. The most contentious issue relates to safety of the main field itself. There are numerous reports about interactions of magnetic fields with living tissues, but so far no known biological effects have been identified as a definite health risk at currently achievable field strengths. From a scientific point of view this seems to be good news for the safe applications of UHF-MR, but translating this lack of evidence into regulatory guidelines is a tricky and contentious issue with potential serious consequences for the field.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andrä W (2007) Magnetism in medicine. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim
CEC (Commission of the European Communities) (2000) Communication from the commission on the precautionary principle. CEC, Brussels, 02.02.2000, COM(2000) 1
Crozier S, Trakic A et al (2007) Numerical study of currents in workers induced by body-motion around high-ultrahigh field MRI magnets. J Magn Reson Imaging 26:1261–1277
Directive 2004/40/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004
Feychting M (2005) Health effects of static magnetic fields—a review of the epidemiological evidence. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 87(2–3):241–246
Foster KR, Vecchia P, Repacholi MH (2000) Risk management. Science and the precautionary principle. Science 288(5468):979–981
Glover PM (2009) Interaction of MRI field gradients with the human body. Phys Med Biol 54(21):R99–R115
Glover PM, Bowtell R (2007) Measurement of electric fields due to time-varying magnetic field gradients using dipole probes. Phys Med Biol 52(17):5119–5130
Glover PM, Cavin I et al (2007a) Magnetic-field-induced vertigo: a theoretical and experimental investigation. Bioelectromagnetics 28(5):349–361
Glover PM, Eldeghaidy S et al (2007b) Measurement of visual evoked potential during and after periods of pulsed magnetic field exposure. J Magn Reson Imaging 26:1353–1356
ICNIRP (1994) Guidelines on limits of exposure to static magnetic-fields. Health Phys 66(1):100–106
ICNIRP (1998) Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz) (vol 74, p 494, 1998). Health Phys 75(4):442–442
ICNIRP, P Int Comm Non-Ionizing Radiation (2009) Guidelines on limits of exposure to static magnetic fields. Health Phys 96(4):504–514
ICNIRP, R Int Commission NonIonizing (2002) General approach to protection against non-ionizing radiation. Health Phys 82(4):540–548
ICNIRP, R Int Commission Nonionizing (2009) ICNIRP statement on the guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz). Health Phys 97(3):257–258
IEC (2008) Standard IEC 60601-2-33: Medical electrical equipment, International Electrotechnical Commission
Kinouchi Y, Yamaguchi H et al (1996) Theoretical analysis of magnetic field interactions with aortic blood flow. Bioelectromagnetics 17(1):21–32
Kirschwink JL (1997) Magnetoreception—homing in on vertebrates. Nature 390(6658):339–340
Miyakoshi J (2005) Effects of static magnetic fields at the cellular level. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 87(2–3):213–223
Reilly JP (1989) Peripheral-nerve stimulation by induced electric currents—exposure to time-varying magnetic-fields. Med Biol Eng Comput 27(2):101–110
Saunders R (2005) Static magnetic fields: animal studies. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 87(2–3):225–239
Schenck JF (2005) Physical interactions of static magnetic fields with living tissues. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 87(2–3):185–204
Simon MD, Geim AK (2000) Diamagnetic levitation: flying frogs and floating magnets (invited). J Appl Phys 87(9):6200–6204
Tenforde TS (2005) Magnetically induced electric fields and currents in the circulatory system. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 87(2–3):279–288
WHO (2006) Environmental health criteria 232: static fields. Geneva, Switzerland, ISBN 92-4-157232-9
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hennig, J. (2012). Safety. In: Hennig, J., Speck, O. (eds) High-Field MR Imaging. Medical Radiology(). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/174_2010_133
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/174_2010_133
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-85087-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-85090-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)