Fetal MRI pp 49-54 | Cite as

Safety of Fetal MRI Scanning

  • Penny Gowland
Part of the Medical Radiology book series (MEDRAD)


MRI uses a variety of different magnetic fields to produce images. These all interact with the body in some way. This chapter considers how they interact with the fetus in particular, and whether they pose any risk to the fetus. It also considers practical aspects of MR scanning that can cause problems for the mother or fetus.


Peripheral Nerve Stimulation International Electrotechnical Commission Fetal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Half Fourier Acquisition Single Shot Turbo Spin Echo Sound Exposure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Baker PN, Johnson IR, Harvey PR, Gowland PA, Mansfield P (1994) A 3-year follow-up of children imaged in-utero with echo-planar magnetic-resonance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170(1):32–33PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Brunelli R, Masselli G, Gualdi G, De Spirito M, Aarasassi T, Perrone G, De Pratti V, Arpe SD, Anceschi MM (2008) Gadolinium-enhanced MRI mapping of placental perfusion in normal and IUGR pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 199(6):470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clements H, Duncan KR, Fielding K, Gowland PA, Johnson IR, Baker PN (2000) Infants exposed to MRI inutero have a normal paediatric assessment at 9 months of age. Br J Radiol 73(866):190–194PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Denegre JM, Valles JM, Lin K, Jordan WB, Mowry KL (1998) Cleavage planes in frog eggs are altered by strong magnetic fields. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95(25):14729–14732PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Duncan K, Baker PN, Johnson IR, Gowland P (1996) Treat patients with kindness during magnetic resonance imaging. Br Med J 312(7043):1421–1421Google Scholar
  6. Edwards MJ (2006) Hyperthermia and fever during pregnancy. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 76(7):507–516PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Etzel RA, Balk SJ, Bearer CF, Miller MD, Shea KM, Simon PR (1997) Noise: a hazard for the fetus and newborn. Pediatrics 100(4):724–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Glover P, Hykin J, Gowland P, Wright J, Johnson I, Mansfield P (1995) An assessment of the intrauterine sound intensity level during obstetric echo-planar magnetic-resonance-imaging. Br J Radiol 68(814):1090–1094PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Glover PM, Cavin I, Qian W, Bowtell R, Gowland PA (2007) Magnetic-field-induced vertigo: a theoretical and experimental investigation. Bioelectromagnetics 28(5):349–361PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gowland PA, De Wilde J (2008) Temperature increase in the fetus due to radio frequency exposure during magnetic resonance scanning. Phys Med Biol 53(21):L15–L18PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hand JW, Li Y, Thomas EL, Rutherford MA, Hajnal JV (2006) Prediction of specific absorption rate in mother and fetus associated with MRI examinations during pregnancy. Magn Reson Med 55(4):883–893PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hand JW, Li Y, Hajnal JV (2010) Numerical study of RF exposure and the resulting temperature rise in the foetus during a magnetic resonance procedure. Phys Med Biol 55(4):913–930PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. HPA (2008) Static magnetic fields (RCE-6). HPA-Advisory Group on Non-Ionising Radiation, ChiltonGoogle Scholar
  14. ICNIRP (2009a) Guidelines on limits of exposure to static magnetic fields. Health Phys 96(4):504–514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. ICNIRP (2009b) Amendment to the ICNIRP “Statement on medical magnetic resonance (MR) procedures: protection of patients”. Health Phys 97(3):259–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Juutilainen J (2005) Developmental effects of electromagnetic fields. Bioelectromagnetics Suppl 7:S107–S115PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kanal E, Gillen J, Evans JA, Savitz DA, Shellock FG (1993) Survey of reproductive health among female MR workers. Radiology 187(2):395–399PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kanal E, Borgstede JP, Barkovich AJ, Bell C, Bradley WG, Felmlee JP, Froelich JW, Kaminski EM, Keeler EK, Lester JW, Scoumis EA, Zaremba LA, Zinninger MD (2002) American College of Radiology white paper on MR safety. Am J Roentgenol 178:1335–1347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kanal E, Borgstede JP, Barkovich AJ, Bell C, Bradley WG, Etheridge S, Felmlee JP, Froelich JW, Hayden J, Kaminski EM, Lester JW, Scoumis EA, Zaremba LA, Zinninger MD (2004) American College of Radiology White Paper on MR Safety.2004 Updates and Revisions. Am J Roentgenol 182(5):1111–1114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kinouchi Y, Yamaguchi H, Tenforde TS (1996) Theoretical analysis of magnetic field interactions with aortic blood flow. Bioelectromagnetics 17(1):21–32PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kok RD, de Vries MM, Heerschap A, van den Berg PP (2004) Absence of harmful effects of magnetic resonance exposure at 1.5 T inutero during the third trimester of pregnancy: a follow-up study. Magn Reson Imaging 22(6):851–854PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Levine D, Zuo C, Faro CB, Chen Q (2001) Potential heating effect in the gravid uterus during MR HASTE imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 13(6):856–861PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Marsal K, Lindblad A, Lingman G, Eiknes SH (1984) Blood-flow in the fetal descending aorta – intrinsic-factors affecting fetal blood-flow, i.e. fetal breathing movements and cardiac-arrhythmia. Ultrasound Med Biol 10(3):339–348PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Michel SCA, Rake A, Keller TM, Huch R, Konig V, Seifert B, Marincek B, Kubik-Huch RA (2003) Fetal cardiographic monitoring during 1.5-T MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol 180(4):1159–1164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Myers C, Duncan KR, Gowland PA, Johnson IR, Baker PN (1998) Failure to detect intrauterine growth restriction following inutero exposure to MRI. Br J Radiol 71(845):549–551PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Nakahara T, Yaguchi H, Yoshida M, Miyakoshi J (2002) Effects of exposure of CHO-K1 cells to a 10 T static magnetic field. Radiology 224(3):817–822PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Poutamo J, Partanen K, Vanninen R, Vainio P, Kirkinen P (1998) MRI does not change fetal cardiotocographic parameters. Prenat Diagn 18(11):1149–1154PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Richards DS, Frentzen B, Gerhardt KJ, McCann ME, Abrams RM (1992) Sound levels in the human uterus. Obstet Gynecol 80(2):186–190PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Shamsi S, Wu DG, Chen J, Liu R, Kainz W (2006) SAR evaluation of pregnant woman models in 64 MHz MRI birdcage coil. IEEE MTT S Int Microw Symp Dig 1–5:225–228Google Scholar
  30. Vadeyar SH, Moore RJ, Strachan BK, Gowland PA, Shakespeare SA, James DK, Johnson IR, Baker PN (2000) Effect of fetal magnetic resonance imaging on fetal heart rate patterns. Am J Obstet Gynecol 182(3):666–669PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sir Peter Mansfield Magnetic Resonance CentreUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations