Skip to main content

Gravity Calibration Baseline Between Jeddah and Taif in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover International Symposium on Gravity, Geoid and Height Systems 2016

Abstract

Relative gravimeters are calibrated for calibration factors relating observable units to gravity. The calibration correction factors with respect to the instrument calibration factors are estimated by measurements at gravity calibration baseline (GCB) stations. GCB is a gravity network where known gravity differences are compared to those measured by relative gravimeters. The GCB in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia has endpoints in Jeddah and Taif. The endpoints were observed by FG5 (#111) and A10 (#029) absolute gravimeters in 2013–2014. Twelve new sites in between the endpoints were installed in the late 2014. There are two stations (center/inside and ex-center/outside) at each GCB sites, hence the GCB includes 28 stations. Absolute gravity (AG) at the GCB stations were observed simultaneously by two A10X (#021, #023) absolute gravimeters. The stations were also tied simultaneously by four CG5 relative gravimeters. Besides gravity gradient at each of the stations was measured by two CG5s. The gravity measurements were completed from December 2014 to January 2015. The total uncertainty of A10X is smaller than 6 μGal. The uncertainties of gravity gradient and tie measurements are smaller than 2 μGal/m and 5.4 μGal, respectively. Comparisons of ties observed by CG5 and A10X result in differences less than 9 μGal. The GCB network is adjusted by weighted constraint least squares. Estimated uncertainty of the gravity differences is 1–2 μGal. The gravity differences between the endpoints of the calibration line at Jeddah and Taif is 430.678 ± 0.002 mGal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ayhan ME et al (2015) Absolute gravity measurements by using FG5 and A10 absolute gravimeters in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Arab J Geosci 8:6199–6209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes DF, Oliver HW, Robbins SL (1969) Standardization of gravimeter calibrations in the geological survey. EOS 50(10):526–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlow BC (1967) Gravity meter calibration in Australia. Bureau of Mineral Resources, Geol. and Geophy., Rept. No.: 122. pp 48

    Google Scholar 

  • Gettings ME (1985) Gravity base ties and gravimeter calibration in western Saudi Arabia. Open-File Report 85-26, Department of Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Gettings P (2009) High precision gravity measurements. Department of Geology & Geophysics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang C, Wang CG, Lee LH (2002) Adjustment of relative gravity measurements using weighted and datum-free constraints. Comput Geosci 28:1005–1015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klopping F (2015) A10X dropper development and applications. MGL in-house White Paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Torge W (1989) Gravimetry. de Gruyter. Berlin. 465 pp

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We appreciate support of GCS for the project. Thanks to Jeff Kanney from MGL, Boulder, Colorado who did seriously A10X measurements. We also thank to field engineers and operators from Magee Geophysical Services, Reno, USA, for their precise field works of CG5 measurements.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gokhan Arslan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Arslan, G., Ayhan, M.E., Al-Muslmani, B.S.A., Al-Qulaity, M.A.S., Al-Shahrani, S.F.A. (2017). Gravity Calibration Baseline Between Jeddah and Taif in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. In: Vergos, G., Pail, R., Barzaghi, R. (eds) International Symposium on Gravity, Geoid and Height Systems 2016. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 148. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2017_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics